Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a single 12" sub in my R33 and I face it towards the end of the car.... Sounds good! I've had a sub pointed into the car in my R31 when i could fold the seats down and almost sit it inside the cabin, but there's not as much bass as being faced the other way and as an enclosed unit (boot)

Just looking at my R32 it seems logical to mount a sub in a sealed box through the plate behind the back seat.(see my posts #18 &

#22 " Where's the bass? " this forum). I've run this idea past a few installers and most have recommended something else for one reason or another. One guy quoted a couple of articles on bass loading in CSA magazine. I found these articles (issues #5 & #9) and I must say that in these tests the forward facing mounting position had the lowest SPL and very uneven frequency response. The main difference between my idea and their setup is that my cabin will be sealed from the boot and their's fires through an open ski-port.

Gester,

The answer to your question is "none of the above"

Try standing in the middle of a room (of any given size) and speak at a normal level. Now go to a corner, face the wall and repeat...

This is why manufacturers of Hi-Fi speakers ALWAYS recommend positioning at least 40-50cm from a side wall - The bass response would lift considerably and "muddy" the soundstage. In a car where you WANT lift face the driver toward the rearmost corner in your boot. You won't win any fashion contests doing this, but you will optimize bass response using the natural acoustics of your car.

Let me know if it makes a difference !

  • 2 weeks later...

wow... almost looks like there is some boot space left there with that setup! :P

My 12" sub should be ariving any day now.. Will be interesting to see what i can do as well. I don't want to lose too much boot, but i know that i will in one way or another.

With bass, low frequencies are a lot more omni directional than higher frequencies, therefore staging is not as important in general in a sub. If you think about it, higher frequencies have less area and therefore bounce around more and are affected more by where it is positioned - so its important to get that part right.

That is why most home theatre applications they generally say you can position the sub most of time where it fits when there is all these theories of where you should be positioning all your other speakers.

I think where you position the sub is not as important as the enclosure (where it develops most of its sound) and the mounting itself (not loose). The key is to make sure there is no non-harmonic vibration or "buzzing" developed. I wonder whether adding sound insulation into the wells and other "open" spaces in there is going to help aswell so less sound can escape?

There is probably a massive art to getting it all perfectly right and requires many complex tools that us peeps probably don't have access to. I'd say unless you do something really stupid its going to sound pretty good - and bass in the end is only part of the equation (for me anyway!)

btw: I don't think that side setup would be that optimal, as really there is really little room for proper resonation behind the speaker, other than the side wells (which are pretty small really and not that effectively shaped)... however you would have good resonation from the front of the speaker, as there is no box filling the rest of the boot. I still think the former is more important though.

I'd say while more practical, you would be sacrificing some volume and quality there.

Originally posted by predator666

With bass, low frequencies are a lot more omni directional than higher frequencies, therefore staging is not as important in general in a sub. If you think about it, higher frequencies have less area and therefore bounce around more and are affected more by where it is positioned - so its important to get that part right.  

That is why most home theatre applications they generally say you can position the sub most of time where it fits when there is all these theories of where you should be positioning all your other speakers.  

you are partly right predator.

in terms of a room, with a large air volume and semi-infinite space, the location of a sub is not "as essential". However, within a car, the primary governance in terms of the effectiveness of bass drivers is the relationship between active and passive wave cancellation.

wavelengths for bass travel are typically in the order of 3m. as governed by c=f x lambda (assuming c=3.3, and f=80 Hz mean). for the best amplitude response, the listener should be positioned at the anti-node of the source. in terms of a woofer driver, this amounts to a multiple of the wavelength.

In short, the MOST CONSISTENT way of acheiving this is to direct the driver toards the back f the trunk. this allows reflecion of the sound wave off rear boot surface (approximately 0.5m) and then travel from the boot to the front of the vehicle cabin (about 2.5m, depending on the car).

this method typically produces best resullts for single driver setups in sedan sized vehicles in terms of SPL. some experimentation may be necessary to determine whether the sound is better when the driver is facced into the LH or RH corner or directly backwards.

  • 3 weeks later...

Gester I'm still undecided as to whether to put the sub behind the seat or in the wheelwell. I don't see it being too difficult to go behind the seat once you've relocated the battery though. I'm still toying with the idea of facing it foward through the arm rest hole but if I do this I can only fit one 10". If i face it backwards I can fit 2 x 12"s easily.

Has anyone managed to put the Sub in the compartment with the battery?

Yep, done it. Single 10" drivers side, facing into the boot, and currently working on the second once I have relocated the battery. 12"s would fit no problem, provided they arent going to be too deep. You can always bring the false wall forward to compensate though, just means less boot space (tis why I have 10") All I need to do now if buy decent 10"s rather than the Sony's I was given :):D

I got mine like the pic above with the driver facing the left suspension tower roughly. Its a solobaric L7 square so the box is absolutely small and the sound is mad for such a small driver in such a miniscule box. also get some brown bread deadener and deaden the boot lid and anywhere else you can fit some if there is any left exspecially the boot floor.

perfect

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Driveability will be about the same with either externally venting BOV, or no BOV at all. Perhaps worse one way than the other, with me thinking that the definitely more flow going through the AFM through a venting BOV more likely to cause rich stalls than the perhaps more flow that the AFM might read on reversion. There is no such thing as "turbo damage" from not having a BOV at stock, or even quite a lot higher than stock, power levels. You need a big turbo with a lot of mass spinning hard getting a horrible slowdown from a slammed shut throttle before there is anything like the shaft loads required to damage things. Not an issue on small turbos. The ONLY 2 reasons that Nissan put a recirc valve onto the RB were: It is a bypass valve. It is open when under vacuum. When not on boost, it bypasses intake air forward around the compressor, which unloads the compressor, allowing the turbine to sping more freely, making the whole lot a bit more efficient when just puddling around. Throttle response should also be faster via the shorter, smaller diameter BOV pipe (when in NA, ie before the BOV closes and boost is building) which is nicer for driveability. Emissions. The reversion causes CO pulses. Eliminate the reversion (or at least, keep it away from the AFM) and you don't get that. The stalling/driveability aspect could have been tuned around, as shown one example of by dose above, if Nissan hadn't put a recirc valve on. Many many turbo engines before the RB had no BOV. They did not stall. See the RB30 turbo as an example. Nistune is definitely better than just stock ECU. It allows you to access and change things that are not excellent on the stock setup, and allows you to do mods like put decent injectors in, relocate the AFM, put a bigger turbo or even cams, etc, on, change to coil swith completely different swell needs, etc etc. All the things that you might need or want to do 25 years after the car was new. Aftermarket replacement ECU is obviously better again, because it gives you even more freedom from the constraints of the stock ECU. I won't be needing to go any further than Nistune though, for the new turbo in the 250ish rwkW region I'm going to, with big injectors, and most other things being stockish.
    • Lucky the prp block is supposed to be released next weekend 
    • Wow guys thank you very much for the HUGE info :-) @GTSBoy I have like 30 minutes if test drive with that car/engine and it not stalled once. IMO it ran very smooth so i guess it was not that bad(but asi i said it is stock) That atmo BoV is worse than no BoV or in my case or it is/will be the same? Cuz frankly i rather have little whooosh sound than that sututu 馃槃 But either way the less harmfull for engine/turbo the better(if the stock is not an option right away) Yeah about that rebuild i talk with guy who will be doing swap and custom pipes...i think i can get stock BoV or get aftermarket which will function the same. Yeah i looked at that R35 option and i try ask my mechanic more about that if he knows. The engine has stock ECU but i can get Nistune for it. On that stock it runs quite well...but i have limited time with it so rly dont know. Ecumaster is this https://www.ecumaster.com/  It is not some dodgy backyard ECU :-)  @MBS206 Yeah but it will be better to have Nistune than the completely stock ECU no? About that "same" atmo/no BoV. The drivebility would be the same? I dont know but i kinda guess that amto BoV would cause more problems than no BoV in my case? Or is the same? You just "change" one sound for the other? Yeah i read many many many topic about hurting the turbo. But no one know anybody that would 100% tell that his turbo/engine blows/get damaged by not running BoV. Of course turbo would be little happier IMO if it has BoV ..but if you do not trash i think i should be good. And as you can see iam already trying to get this right...just working what i have right now :-) Yeah iam kinda the same...i dont want nothing loud and frankly iam not liking that sututu noise that much 馃槃 i rather have little bit of "whooosh" or no sound at all. Of course in my case it si a completely another world when you came tu Turbo car with open air box and no BoV and you driving the N/A ...all i hear is engine. Here? I heard turbo/sucking and that sututu 馃槃 @Yeetus So in my case it is really no difference to run no BoV or some atmo BoV like GReddy FV2? The car would drive the same and has "the same" little problems? As i wrote above i kinda thinked that atmo BoV with stock MAF would cause more problems...but then again i dont know much about no BoV either :-)  So to avoid stalling i "cant" just put neutral on stop lights like from higher rpm? Or? Yeah iam already looking for ECU :-)  Yes iam at the same side with thar R35 MAF :-)  @Dose Pipe Sutututu Thank you i (my mechanic/tuner) will look into that) Guess iam taking the Nistune at least :-) 
    • Here's the workaround with Nistune I was talking about, just add in more timing on the decel table And play around with the fuel cut & recovery, it's enough to stop it from stalling on a decel  
    • Hi Apex and welcome! 
  • Create New...