Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'll be finishing the Cefiro with the RB25DE + T70 later today so I'll scan that when we're done.

Last reading was 249 rwkw @ 17 psi

Completely STOCK RB25DE with a T70 600hp, 600x300x100 FMIC, GTR Injectors, Z32 AFM, Desno 600 hp Fuel Pump, Remapped R32 GTST ECU, and that's it.

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ebay turbos are BAD......have a look at these links

http://www.mx6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=110947

I think the funniest thing about that pic is they had to stamp the word "TURBO" into the housing, just in case you're not sure what it actually is. Like "nah, it's really a turbo! honest! just read the letters!" ;)

Bear in mind that Canberra is comparatively high altitude, so the BP should be lower.

Check your barrometer, i dont think it would ever go to 930. Currently in Canberra its 1023, With cyclone Tracey coming it might get down to 980 at its worst.

  • 1 month later...

Well I just found this thread...

The passage has so far made 303.9rwkws on 16psi (not with stock injectors) but with stock internals and has done 300+ at 3 different dyno locations. As for all the weather men, Canberra is at 93-96BP it is at altitude and is the true reading, (most weather reports measure at sea level) you can see all the summernats dyno sheets are around that reading.

KKR is a little laggy cuz its big, but for bang for the buck its unreal....Nismoid and others are just pissed they spent 5 zero's and have ball park same power.

KKR all the way

Possible 340rwkws at 20psi but also possible boom with stock internals.

A little bit of info is dangerous huh?

G.

whilst your graph certainly proves max power is possible it still doesnt prove much else.

you said yourself its a laggy mofo. average power makes the car quick on the street, not peaky power like the KKR that you've posted.

the info is hardly dangerous nor does it prose a threat to anyone else on this forums that insists on using corret turbochargers for their application

sounds like it would suck on the street (lag city)

whilst your graph certainly proves max power is possible it still doesnt prove much else.

you said yourself its a laggy mofo. average power makes the car quick on the street, not peaky power like the KKR that you've posted.

the info is hardly dangerous nor does it prose a threat to anyone else on this forums that insists on using corret turbochargers for their application

sounds like it would suck on the street (lag city)

Won't debate that, not run a 1/4 yet.. On R31 I never said it was lightning just posted power.

G.

KKR is a little laggy cuz its big,

KKR 480 is not big. A GT42 is big, a t04z is big

A KKR is firmly in GT30 (Garrett and HKS) territory which is a medium sized turbo upgrade family.

Same as TD06's and other turbo brands, which looking at results on this forum, dont even come close.

Do you actually have any technical knowledge to share as to why it is so late to deliver power?

Or are you gonna pretend its because its "big" (which has been established, that it isnt)

Im pissed off :) news to me.

Im actually quite amused you can sit here and try and pass it off as a viable upgrade

I had useable power some... 2500rpm earlier. Or maybe 3000rpm.

Its just so hard to tell with your graph as its got the powerband of a turbo double its size

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1144976656.jpg

Go run a time then come back and tell us how good it is.

You'll find yourself falling into a hole inbetween gear changes so im predicting a time in the 13-sec zone

Until then, its a paper weight in terms of a performance upgrade without some evidence

KKR 480 is not big. A GT42 is big, a t04z is big

A KKR is firmly in GT30 (Garrett and HKS) territory which is a medium sized turbo upgrade family.

Same as TD06's and other turbo brands, which looking at results on this forum, dont even come close.

Do you actually have any technical knowledge to share as to why it is so late to deliver power?

Or are you gonna pretend its because its "big" (which has been established, that it isnt)

Im pissed off :D news to me.

Im actually quite amused you can sit here and try and pass it off as a viable upgrade

I had useable power some... 2500rpm earlier. Or maybe 3000rpm.

Its just so hard to tell with your graph as its got the powerband of a turbo double its size

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1144976656.jpg

Go run a time then come back and tell us how good it is.

You'll find yourself falling into a hole inbetween gear changes so im predicting a time in the 13-sec zone

Until then, its a paper weight in terms of a performance upgrade without some evidence

With the modded actuator its boosting from 2800RPM so if you are 3000 under that, then I'm impressed :D

And I told you that you are pissed :nyaanyaa:

PS Why so hostile on KKR did one rape your sister or skyline :laugh:

With the modded actuator its boosting from 2800RPM so if you are 3000 under that, then I'm impressed :(

And I told you that you are pissed :(

PS Why so hostile on KKR did one rape your sister or skyline :D

If it starts building @2800 and takes what... 3000rpm to build to 20psi...

I dunno how else to term un-responsive

If it starts building @2800 and takes what... 3000rpm to build to 20psi...

I dunno how else to term un-responsive

Yep 2800 with the big boot at 5000rpm (on 16psi)

In the process of gettin some hoops for the strip I'll see how we go.

G.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...