Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Selling the running gear out of a 1996 V-Spec R33 GT-R. Car had 53,000 k's on the odometer. Have everything from intercooler, radiator, all pipework, motor, exhaust to cat, wiring harness, CPU, gearbox, clutch, tailshaft, diff, rear cradle w/axles. Everything you would need to convert an N/A car, have an R32 wiring loom if needed. Setup is completely stock except for HKS pod filters.

$7,000. Located in Sydney. Will seperate if there is enough interest in the various parts.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108247-1996-v-spec-r33-gt-r-running-gear/
Share on other sites

Complete fuel tank with pump - $200

Gearbox - $1,000

Rear cradle w/diff, axles, hubs etc - $750

AFAIK transfer case coolers only came on Aus delivered models, I do have regular GTR diffs that don't require the active LSD gear.

Motor - $4500

As I posted earlier I'm not too keen on splitting up the lot, will have to wait a week or so to gauge interest.

Rear cradle w/diff, axles, hubs etc - $750

AFAIK transfer case coolers only came on Aus delivered models, I do have regular GTR diffs that don't require the active LSD gear.

As I posted earlier I'm not too keen on splitting up the lot, will have to wait a week or so to gauge interest.

RESPECTED :huh:

Do you know if the rear diff would fit in an R33 S2 GTST? And also would ALSD work? I think its a separate computer!

I've got another sale post for a GTR rear end modified to fit an R33 GTS-t. There are a few mods that you need to do, and depending on how you want to run it (and what parts you're willing to buy - like shocks).

I wouldn't run an ALSD diff, too much mucking around. I'm not sure if the Vspec ALSD has the same connections as the GTS-t ALSD. But yes, essentially the GTR one fits.

i know we shouldnt post chat in FS, but you guys are looking at this all wrong. it's a better opportunity to buy the lot, grab am auto NA 33 GTS and have your self a 33 GTR quick car, for 33 GTST money. if i didnt already have 3 cars i would be sorely tempted to give it a shot. would make a nice sleeper or an awesome track car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And make sure the belts are tightened appropriately too.
    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
×
×
  • Create New...