Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I thought improved production rules stated that you can use any engine as long as the maker of the engine was the same as the maker of the car.

so it eligable?

No an R32 GTST is not eligible for IPRA.

The only grey imports legal for IPRA ar e R32 GTR and S13 Silvia.

To be eligible for IPRA, a car must be either:

1) Group A homologated

2) commercially available to the public in asutralia as new cars through a manufacturer's dealer network, or

3) otherwise recognised by CAMS...for group 3J

S13 silvia is the only grey import recognised by CAMS for IPRA http://www.cams.com.au/bulletins/B06-019%2...%20Vehicles.pdf. So an S13 chassis is allowed, but only with S13 silvia body. And only with CA18 and SR20 engines that were available in that model. Not permitted to run a 6cyl engine in that chassis, as the block must have the same number of cylinders/rotors as standard, and the same configuration of cylinders as the standard car (ie in-line, horizontally opposed).

S14 and S15 are eligible as they were sold here.

R32 GTST is not eligible. R32 GTR is group A homologated, and therefore OK.

No R33 or R34 is eliglible.

only allowed to use engines from eligible vehicles, so RB20 and RB25 variants are not allowed. No eligible vehicle had them. RB30 is OK, and cyl heads on approved blocks are free for early model vehicles. If you use a non-standard head or block in a late model vehicle, you must comply to minimum racing weights- ie 1602-2000cc (non turbo) 1045kg. turbo 1.8 or 2L 4cyl = 3001-4000cc 1285kg, but they must have the same number of cyl in the same config as the standard car- eg in-line 4cyl can only be replaced by another inline 4cyl engine from the same manufacturer.

1.4 Automobile make and model: Vehicles manufactured by the same company but under a different brand name are considered to be the same make, eg, Nissan/Datsun, Mazda/Eunos, Toyota/Lexus etc. Any component fitted to a production vehicle will be regarded as belonging to that manufacturer of that vehicle irrespective of the actual source of manufacture. Manufacturers are not considered to be the same solely by virtue of having a common parent or holding company. Model refers to a member of the same family of vehicle as produced by the manufacturer.
I've always interpreted this as "if the GTR is eligible, then so is the GTSt", as it is the same model as a GTR, ie R32, but a different spec. Although I could be misinterpreting it.
I've always interpreted this as "if the GTR is eligible, then so is the GTSt", as it is the same model as a GTR, ie R32, but a different spec. Although I could be misinterpreting it.

that's simply a definition of make and model, and you interpretation is correct, but that sentence does not make any make or model of vehicle eligible. You need to read the section on eligible vehicles. Eligibilty is granted on a per vehicle basis, not on a model family basis.

All models of Touring Cars with DOTAR's import approval are elligible for Improved Production. They are commercially available in Australia. To have you model included you just apply in writing to your State's elligibily officer. The list is updated continuously.

:whistling: Cheers :stupid:

PS; An R32GTST ran in the Improved Production Nationals last time they were in Tasmania, where they are again in 2006.

All models of Touring Cars with DOTAR's import approval are elligible for Improved Production. They are commercially available in Australia. To have you model included you just apply in writing to your State's elligibily officer. The list is updated continuously.

:O Cheers :devil:

PS; An R32GTST ran in the Improved Production Nationals last time they were in Tasmania, where they are again in 2006.

from my previous post, which is directly out of the 3J regs in the CAMS manual:

2) commercially available to the public in australia as new cars through a manufacturer's dealer network

DOTARs doesn't count. You must be mistaken about seeing one compete at the nationals in Tas. Or maybe they didn't get a full grid and invited other categories to make up numbers?

the list of specially approved models is

1. Mitsubishi Mirage Cyborg (to cater for ex Mirage Cup cars)

2. Nissan Silvia S13 (turbo and naturally aspirated)

that's it

Edited by hrd-hr30

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks everyone for the replies and suggestions. Got the seats out (hoping I could find some existing grommets but no such luck). By tapping and measuring etc. I could figure out where I could drill through if needed. But first I borrowed an inspection camera and managed to go through factory holes in the chassis rail and could see that the captive nut was holding steady which is why it could retighten. So it was indeed a stripped section of thread, so I applied downforce by levering the bolt head with a screwdriver and went slowly back and forth until it came out. Camera helped a lot cos I could monitor that the captive nut was holding tight. Now I just have one very seized main subframe nut to tackle 馃槄
    • BOVs do have a purpose, if you ever log pressure before and after the throttle body, you will see a spike pre throttle on lift off from a WOT condition. Enough to bend throttle blades / damage e-throttle motors or simple assist in blowing off cooler pipes. FWIW, the above on really applies to those running at least 2 bar of boost. OP shouldn't have an issue, on the other hand, here are some videos of my shit box over a decade ago with some succulent dose with the airbox on and off. That shit box is unrecognisable these days 馃珷    
    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
    • I see you missed the rest of the conversation where they have benefits, but nothing to do with avoiding breaking turbos, which is what the aftermarket BOV made all the fan boys, tuners, and modders believe was the only purpose for them...
    • But they do so for the other reasons to have a compressor bypass. It's in the name.
  • Create New...