Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I usually use bp ultimate and got about 400km per tank

But i changed to a k&n filter, 3in turbo back and upped the boost to about 10 psi.(about two weeks ago)

I am now getting about 460-500 per tank (red light for the last 30km)

Everything stock except the above, still using bp ultimate..

I have found in the past that caltex/woolies petrol never gave me as much k's

96 rs4, btw

OK ..... I'll bite.

What's wrong with Mobil?

Had a very expensive experience with my old R31 when I was using Synergy 8000.

Got a bad batch (I guess) and it seized up the car. Turns out everything from the pump to the injectors needed replacing.

The mechanic said it was like someone had put glue on my tank (not possible as the sputtering only started after I filled up on the way to work that day).

It is probably a fine fuel now, but you know how it goes.

Hard to quantify. Last tank gave me 12.5 l / 100, previously its been more like 15. 570 ks per tank vs 450

As I said, I'm trying the 2nd tank now.

As to power, this is seat of the pants stuff. I'm comparing with my 200kw ATW zxtt. Still not as fast, but noticeably better than it was.

m

hmmm, interesting.

I know it is impossible to replicate exactly, but are you roughly traveling the same route & similar speeds as with the previous tanks?

Need to fill up today... Might give it a go.

As an aside, are there any RS or RX owners getting the 15L/100 mileage that the AR-x owners are getting?

I only ask because I have never travelled less than 615kms from full to when the light comes on.

Even with the exhaust and 1bar max boost I am still getting 630-640kms.

Could the Ar-x be thirstier than an RS/RX?

i pulled the top off the tank one day . the fuel light had come on with in a k of home . we all know how big the tank is . about 3 foot wide and 2 foot long (roughly) (ish) and there was at least 5 inches of fuel in there .

the guy that said it caught him out did it stop while you were driving or would it not start after you parked somewhere . coz as we all know it makes a huge diff if the car is parked on an angle

114.5 :) who cares what they use at this price

That's if your being tight and putting in normal unleaded (has anyone put normal unleaded if so, how does it run). I normally use either 95 (BP 95 Unleaded or Synergy 5000) or 98 (Ulitmate or Synergy 8000) roughly get around 430 - 440 per tank but I haven't ran the tank to light goes on for a while

Edited by BigDirtyJase
That's if your being tight and putting in normal unleaded (has anyone put normal unleaded if so, how does it run). I normally use either 95 (BP 95 Unleaded or Synergy 5000) or 98 (Ulitmate or Synergy 8000) roughly get around 430 - 440 per tank but I haven't ran the tank to light goes on for a while

mobil or BP 98 :D

i just use the normal ULP price as a reference point as i am sure many others do- its on the big signs when driving past :P

  • 1 month later...

Well I'll be damned... I've had the last week off work and managed 11.9L/100km in one tank with the occasional boost but otherwise very wary of being light footed. Usually the mrs drives it 5-6 days a week and I get 13.5-14L/100km. What a difference the driver makes!

hmmm, interesting.

I know it is impossible to replicate exactly, but are you roughly traveling the same route & similar speeds as with the previous tanks?

Need to fill up today... Might give it a go.

As an aside, are there any RS or RX owners getting the 15L/100 mileage that the AR-x owners are getting?

I only ask because I have never travelled less than 615kms from full to when the light comes on.

Even with the exhaust and 1bar max boost I am still getting 630-640kms.

Could the Ar-x be thirstier than an RS/RX?

Interesting.

Remember that the only cat I have is on the dump, my front pipe has deleted the large cat.

I filled 2 tanks with Vortex98 and let me tell you, my car reeked on rotten eggs, my mate told me that I blew a puff of black smoke when changing gears on high boost and I got ~20km's less for each tank.

After having the next 2 tanks filled with Ultimate, no more smells or black puffs & my economy is back to 620-640km's until the light comes on.

My last 2 tanks have been of Vpower & have been the same as with Ultimate.

I guess that Vortex is a dirtier fuel after all. :cheers:

My trip to work is quite short. At other times I am usually adjusting something like now when I am fine tuning my boost controller (foot flat much of the time) to suit my new turbo so I am getting about 20L per 100km or just over 300k per tank. The best I have ever had is about 13L per 100k ( about 420km per tank). I am stopping spending money on my engine when I install my adjustable exhaust cam gear and then I am going to the top tuner in town and hope to get 200 - 220 AWKW with absolutely smooth acceleration and better fuel consumption when touring.

I am using E10 fuel and i have always figured that the highest octane fuel doesn't cost more because it is more efficient. the standard ecu will adjust for different octanes but it always runs too rich at the top end. For those with computers or other fuel control devices these are usually set to a particular fuel so it doesn't pay to chop and change.

2000 model, stock standard Stagea Type S;

Averaging 420-450km to a tank around town.

Got 9.6L/100km on the Hume Hwy to Sydney last month.

That sound about right? I thought the highway consumption was not too bad (still pretty dodgey around town though ). :(

2000 model, stock standard Stagea Type S;

Averaging 420-450km to a tank around town.

Got 9.6L/100km on the Hume Hwy to Sydney last month.

That sound about right? I thought the highway consumption was not too bad (still pretty dodgey around town though ). :(

Stageas are heavy gas guzzlers. Your figures are very good.
Standard s2 rs4v

12.5 - 13.5L/100 - fast country driving running 95vortex

20L/100 - running reg. unleaded :(

I always thought running 91ron and 95ron fuel was not very good for a 98ron car? Seems to be a few people running 95ron in their stags.

I always thought running 91ron and 95ron fuel was not very good for a 98ron car? Seems to be a few people running 95ron in their stags.

Some servos are still pretty dodgy. Some I have been to in tne sticks sell 95 at 98 price Some dont even know which Ron it.

Im still in the 15/16 rut. The hills are fun to drive so I cant complain. Got some real Vortex for 101.9 last week.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...