Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeh, but I think it is pretty widely accepted that the rear head drain doesn't act as a drain, it's a vent. 

 

But I find it interesting that in 82 pages of discussion and the general consensus being to drill out the oil returns to 10mm, nobody has mentioned weakening the block by doing so. But any engine builder or machinist I speak to is hesitant to drill out the returns. One said he might do 7mm, but certainly not 10mm. And I believe CRD also say don't touch them, leave them standard size. 

 

Cause this thread was started by circuit racers who only had 300-350rwkw back in the day

e85 bumped that up to 400rwkw

noW all the drag kids with 700-1000hp(that converts to 1000-1400hp in trump land) are on board and Reading info from circuit guys from 20 years ago

  • Haha 1

I'd be surprised if drilling the drains out would significantly weaken the block. Yeah, sure, when pushing to really big power figures you probably need every little bit of material you can get, but by then I'm sure you're in need of a half grout fill and so on anyway.

Yeh that was sort of my suspicion. I know a lot of these guys are building 1000hp+ engines, so it doesn't surprise me that they are thinking of block strength. But it was something I considered interesting enough to ask the question. 

I'm currently building my motor with a goal of 450rwkw so nothing crazy, but it is for a dedicated time attack car, so I want to get the oil control right (in Perth though, so our track is going to be pretty forgiving with no fast left-handers). My block is currently with my machinist, and he is happy to drill out the returns to 7mm and chamfer them, although he said it looks like the gasket might cover some of that anyway and isn't really sure there's any point. I'm sure I saw a picture in this thread of how the gasket sits with the enlarged return, but I can't find it now.

I'm at 500kw at the hubs and use for circuit, and Tarmac Rally.

 

1 hour ago, Unzipped Composites said:

Yeh that was sort of my suspicion. I know a lot of these guys are building 1000hp+ engines, so it doesn't surprise me that they are thinking of block strength. But it was something I considered interesting enough to ask the question. 

I'm currently building my motor with a goal of 450rwkw so nothing crazy, but it is for a dedicated time attack car, so I want to get the oil control right (in Perth though, so our track is going to be pretty forgiving with no fast left-handers). My block is currently with my machinist, and he is happy to drill out the returns to 7mm and chamfer them, although he said it looks like the gasket might cover some of that anyway and isn't really sure there's any point. I'm sure I saw a picture in this thread of how the gasket sits with the enlarged return, but I can't find it now.

I'm in Perth too.   If you go to Collie (and you definitely should) it will be all left handers.   Come do a Rally Sprint and watch your oil logs go nuts even with all the wet sump mods.

If you're building a serious time attack car go dry sump and don't stuff around ever again with it.  

28 minutes ago, R32 TT said:

I'm at 500kw at the hubs and use for circuit, and Tarmac Rally.

 

I'm in Perth too.   If you go to Collie (and you definitely should) it will be all left handers.   Come do a Rally Sprint and watch your oil logs go nuts even with all the wet sump mods.

If you're building a serious time attack car go dry sump and don't stuff around ever again with it.  

 

It isn't what I would consider a 'serious' time attack car. It's a development car for my business, so will primarily be used for developing and collecting real world data on aero and other carbon fibre components that I build. I already build half the field in Racer class, as well as sponsoring two of the cars in that class - so I don't really want to try to compete with those guys, that isn't in my interests. 

 

That said, I still intend to compete in the secondary Tuner Class, so I am aiming for the 61 second bracket around Barbs. Which is no 55/56 second car, but it is still very very quick for a RWD front-engine car. The engine is going to have to be capable to do it. But dry sump is not part of the equation.

  • Like 1

You will almost certainly have oil surge problems doing 61's at Barbagallo in my opinion.  Even with all of the Wet Sump mods in these preceding pages.

Maybe consider adding an Accumulator as a band-aid.

1 hour ago, Ben C34 said:

You would have to think Venting the sump properly pretty much cancels out the need to drill the returns.

 

Yeh I would have thought it would help for sure, and I do intend to vent the sump properly. 

I'm really just going off the info in this thread vs what experienced builders are telling me. This is a pretty respected thread, and there seems to be a pretty widely accepted summary of feed restrictors, vented/extended/baffled sump, drilled oil returns, no rear head vent. So I just wonder where the discrepancy comes in between that consensus, and what engine builders/machinists say is the way to do it. Is this thread out-dated? Or are the engine builders?

 

 

 

7 minutes ago, R32 TT said:

You will almost certainly have oil surge problems doing 61's at Barbagallo in my opinion.  Even with all of the Wet Sump mods in these preceding pages.

Maybe consider adding an Accumulator as a band-aid.

 

Yeh I sort of expect to, which is why I want to get it right. However there are a few cars in Racer that are going under the 60.0 bracket, none of them are dry sump (Laine and Simon are the two that come to mind, though perhaps I'm forgetting if Simon has gone dry sump - I'm quite sure he hasn't) and not having crazy oil control issues. So I'm sure it can be done.

 

Oil accumulator I am sort of planning on. Perhaps not initially, but I do feel it is affordable insurance, so I think it will happen.

  • Like 1
34 minutes ago, Unzipped Composites said:

Is this thread out-dated? Or are the engine builders?

The thread may well be outdated relative to stupid power levels. The engine builders would rather an engine that has oil breathing problems than one that cracks the block, so are being (possibly excessively) conservative.

The simple fact remains that more open area is required for gases to go up and oil to go down. However you achieve that is however you achieve that. I have no doubt that many have implemented the vents without drilling the block, which may well prove that you don't need to drill the returns.

I don't have much skin in the game, but I think if I was building a moderately serious engine, I would drill the returns out as much as I thought they could take, and put stiffness back in via other means if I was aiming for more power than is actually useful.

13 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

I don't have much skin in the game, but I think if I was building a moderately serious engine, I would drill the returns out as much as I thought they could take, and put stiffness back in via other means if I was aiming for more power than is actually useful.

No you wouldn't..     you'd dry sump it.   Look within - you know you would.  ;)

Just a completely side question for the engineers here.  Has anyone thought about 'rifling' the oil drains?  Essentially like making a keyway down that hole?   May not be easy to do I am not machinist.   But I have a faint memory from physics days that this may actually be more effective than drilling out by breaking the surface tension and allowing a pathway for air to travel up alongside the oil trying to get back down..   ?    having a perfectly round hole promotes the oil to keep the hole 'blocked' so to speak.

Thoughts?   Or am I talking rubbish?

Edited by R32 TT
8 minutes ago, R32 TT said:

No you wouldn't..     you'd dry sump it.   Look within - you know you would.  ;)

Just a completely side question for the engineers here.  Has anyone thought about 'rifling' the oil drains?  Essentially like making a keyway down that hole?   May not be easy to do I am not machinist.   But I have a faint memory from physics days that this may actually be more effective than drilling out by breaking the surface tension and allowing a pathway for air to travel up alongside the oil trying to get back down..   ?    having a perfectly round hole promotes the oil to keep the hole 'blocked' so to speak.

Thoughts?   Or am I talking rubbish?

 

Haha, you and my machinist would get on well I feel. He also isn't one to do things by halves, and over the years has tried to talk me into dry sump/Motec/PDM/sell the Skyline and buy a Lamborghini if you actually want to go fast, etc.

 

I'll ask him what he thinks of your keyhole suggestion, I feel his response will be something along the lines of it being practically too difficult to do vs the theoretical advantages of it.

 

GTSBoy, I feel you've nailed the answer to my question, thank you.

 

  • Like 1
7 minutes ago, R32 TT said:

No you wouldn't..     you'd dry sump it.   Look within - you know you would. 

Well, for a circuit engine, you're probably right.

8 minutes ago, R32 TT said:

Just a completely side question for the engineers here.  Has anyone thought about 'rifling' the oil drains?

Uh. maybe. But probably not. If you want to try to use rotation to generate centrifugal forces to keep the oil on the outer and gas up the centre then you'd really need to get the oil spinning before it enters the drain hole. Like a cyclone (you know, particle or droplet separator). That way the oil will spin out against the side and sort of stay there.

But I doubt that there's a lot of benefit. Certainly not gunna be easy to do either, given cast iron, etc etc. Better to just do all the actually easy stuff.

  • Like 1

Wasn't so much about spinning or centifugal forces.  I probably shouldn't have used the word rifling. 

More about breaking up the uniformity of the hole by having a channel to one side of it.   If you pour oil down it, the majority will go down the larger portion of that hole and air will come up the channel.     So the theory is to promote this action and perhaps have faster oil return..     I'll have to find a youtube on it to explain it better..      but yes, you're right at the end of the day probably too hard to pull off vs the benefit.

21 minutes ago, R32 TT said:

Wasn't so much about spinning or centifugal forces.  I probably shouldn't have used the word rifling. 

More about breaking up the uniformity of the hole by having a channel to one side of it.   If you pour oil down it, the majority will go down the larger portion of that hole and air will come up the channel.     So the theory is to promote this action and perhaps have faster oil return..     I'll have to find a youtube on it to explain it better..      but yes, you're right at the end of the day probably too hard to pull off vs the benefit.

Please try it and report back (although success may be hard to measure!).  The purpose of the sump breathers going to catch can(s) and eventually the turbo intake is to generate negative pressure in the crank case (or at least to reduce the positive pressure) to facilitate oil return.

  • Like 1
2 hours ago, R32 TT said:

Wasn't so much about spinning or centifugal forces.  I probably shouldn't have used the word rifling. 

More about breaking up the uniformity of the hole by having a channel to one side of it.   If you pour oil down it, the majority will go down the larger portion of that hole and air will come up the channel.     So the theory is to promote this action and perhaps have faster oil return..     I'll have to find a youtube on it to explain it better..      but yes, you're right at the end of the day probably too hard to pull off vs the benefit.

Yeah, once I heard rifling I assumed that the spiral shape was important to your thinking.

The three big issues at hand are;

  • oil viscosity/surface tension,
  • qty of oil that needs to go down,
  • qty of gas that needs to come up.

I strongly suspect that cross sectional area is the king, assuming that the three main factors are essentially fixed for any given engine & operation thereof. Therefore I wouldn't expect to be able to pull too many tricks with the shape of the hole (which is essentially what any little keyway/slot runnign down one side of it would be). And further, narrow slots don't play well with movement of oil. Surface tension will hold a liquid in a narrow slot against gravity. So t probably wouldn't drain any better anyway. And then, if you just make the slot "not narrow", ie make it a bloody great wide slot, then it just comes back to extra cross sectional area. And possibly with the bad addition of sharp corners to create stress raisers.

We're probably better off just agreeing to add big fat sump breathers and drill out the oil drains only if forced to (although, it's a bit late once the engine is running!)

Edited by GTSBoy
  • Like 1
22 hours ago, Unzipped Composites said:

Yeh I sort of expect to, which is why I want to get it right. However there are a few cars in Racer that are going under the 60.0 bracket, none of them are dry sump (Laine and Simon are the two that come to mind, though perhaps I'm forgetting if Simon has gone dry sump - I'm quite sure he hasn't) and not having crazy oil control issues. So I'm sure it can be done.

 

Oil accumulator I am sort of planning on. Perhaps not initially, but I do feel it is affordable insurance, so I think it will happen.

I don't have a dry sump but I probably should. If I cared more about the engine I probably would but it's a bottom of the ocean junker so it's not a huge concern. I get some concerns with pressure, it always stays above 50psi so at least there is oil there.

22 hours ago, R32 TT said:

If you're building a serious time attack car go dry sump and don't stuff around ever again with it.  

Is it too soon to bring up dry sumps being a stuff around in the first place :P

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
    • I’m not sure what happened I told them about sonic tunes free OTS tune and the next the I know .. I was booted..   To funny 
    • Yea - I mean I've seen my fuel pump which is decades old and uh, while I'm not saying this with real knowledge... but I sure get the ick at using anything in the fuel system that produced the state of that pump. Many years ago I went through multiple pumps (and strainers) before I dropped the tank to clean it out with extreme violence. I'm talking the car would do maybe 50km before coming to a halt, which resulted in me cleaning out the filter with some brake cleaner and going on my way. None of my stuff ever looked like what came out of your fuel tank. I don't think I'd be happy with it unless every single component was replaced (or at least checked/cleaned/confirmed to be clean here).
×
×
  • Create New...