Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just want 2 no if i will make 200kwatw with the following mods 2 my r33 gtst

3" tbe with split front/ dump pipe and hi flow cat

hi flowed turbo

about 14- 15 psi

CAI

FMIC

After market ECU, probly PFC

Nismo 550cc injectors

Also am considering custom intake plenum

So wot do u guys think i will make with these mods?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/111082-will-i-make-200kwatw/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's overkill, but yeh should do easily. Don't forget a fuel pump.

You can reach 200kw with the stock turbo. Just need fuel pump, exhaust, intercooler, an exhaust cam gear, boost controller and PFC.

yeah you should make 200rwkw, on that boost with a hiflow turbo

im making 200rwkw now with

PFC

FMIC

AVCR

CES Split dump

3" Exhaust

Stock engine and turbo is on 12 psi .

Im currently in the middle of putting on

Hiflow turbo

walbro fuel pump

z32 afm

Boost will then be taken up to 15psi

hopefully should be seeing a lil increase with power.

Gtr33 pump 150 second hand. direct swap. theres a howto guide on the Tutorial section. Should take you about 3 hours to fit? just take the old one out, swap wires, mash the new one onto the harness, put back in and done.

yep it will be fine. 15psi is too high and will cause turbocharger failure (on the stock one). make sure u have a heavy duty clutch. you may wish to look at a z32 airflow meter. no need for plenum intake mods.

there are some pretty keen dynos around.... a lot of the figures people quote with standard turbos and minimal mods is rediculous... dont worry so much about "rwkw" but how the car drives and a good tune....

i have destroyed quite a few cars with a lot more 'dyno' power.

yep it will be fine. 15psi is too high and will cause turbocharger failure (on the stock one). make sure u have a heavy duty clutch. you may wish to look at a z32 airflow meter. no need for plenum intake mods.

I was told that 15psi was perfectly fine for wot im goin 2 do as its being hi flowed and will have no problems supporting that boost and this is coming from sum1 who knows a shit load bout working on skylines.

As fro the 200kwatw figure i just thought that it would b a nice figure 2 have my car around for day to day driving with the occasional trip to WSID. Wot im realy hopping 4 is to get into a mid to high 12 once i get a better suspension set up. Once ive done this ilol b happy and just concentrate on the rest of the car

my comment was based on the stock turbo (did you read the comment in brackets?). 15psi is fine for a hiflowed one. note boost doesnt make power, airflow does. also you should sort out your suspension first if you want a 12

there are some pretty keen dynos around.... a lot of the figures people quote with standard turbos and minimal mods is rediculous... dont worry so much about "rwkw" but how the car drives and a good tune....

i have destroyed quite a few cars with a lot more 'dyno' power.

yeah some pretty keen dynos, this power resulted in a 13.1 pass on street tyres that were half gone. Seems to be reasonable ye?

Rev210 id agree on the power for times but ( i have read your r33 gtst threads good reads aswell) you must be 1 of the best 1/4 strip drivers on this forum so you and a couple of athers could do the 170rwkw for 13 pass but you would have to agree that it would not be the norm

You in a real 170 could do it but more could not than can i think

james

Hi james,

By way of encouragement if you consider that the 170rwkw 13.3 pass had a 60ft of 2.3 seconds it leaves room for those of us who are still learning to launch the car, in that case I was hardly making a good case for my drag racing skill. The area of greatest improvement is to optimise the power average and response of the engine.

More attention to what the curve looks like on a dyno graph and less on what the peak value is. If you stop comparing power outputs and start looking at the shapes and values of these graphs on similar motors you get a better understanding of things.

yeah some pretty keen dynos, this power resulted in a 13.1 pass on street tyres that were half gone. Seems to be reasonable ye?

What does that have to do with what i said?

i was comparing different dynos... congratulations your car was on one that was realistic. Then again 1/4 times and rwkw dont have a hell of a lot to do with eachother... obviously your car is well set up, there are plenty out there that arent

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...