Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Good idea, but i dont like how they have an elbow at the point where it mounts to the seat belts. In an accident it would place a bending moment on the bar and unless there is something done to stop it rotating you could quickly find yourself with 4-6" of loose harness as the thing spins 180deg.

Good idea though.

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hey guys, what is the legalities for using harness on the street?? I was thinking of getting a harness to use with my GTR pew, maybe a quick release so i can use the lap/sash when i am cruising about

Yeh see what you saying but I think that is what the brace (which appears to be adjustable ) to the floor is there to prevent am assuming it would go to maybe the seat belt anchor points not sure might have to try and get in touch with the seller on ebay for more info.

These would I assume be okay for track days etc. where only normal lap sash type belts are okay but would have to be removed if you wanted to use the rear seat anyway, with a B Pillar brace I reckon they would stiffen up the car a little though too.

Hey guys, what is the legalities for using harness on the street?? I was thinking of getting a harness to use with my GTR pew, maybe a quick release so i can use the lap/sash when i am cruising about

Funnily enouigh, the crappy harnesses that have a buckle like a std seat belt are the only type of legal harness. Even then they need to be engineered to ensure that teh person installing them has enough grey matter to ensure they are correctly installed.

So the cool $500 Willans harnesses et c are illegal

Stumbled across this the other day and seemed like a good option to me however it is designed for s14-15 but a similar idea might work for a skyline I thinks

Would stiffen up the car some too, was on ebay here:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/RACE-HARNES...sspagenameZWD2V

post-33041-1178194060.jpg

anyone seen similar for a line?

i would not personally use that to mount a harness. i would think any cams scrutineer would not be having a bar of it. (pun intended).

Plus, it makes both your rear seats unuseable for no good reason. with a single harness the passenger side rear seat is still usable, and with un clipping 2 belts both rear seats are usable.

Also, different ppl have different likes, but i personally woudl rather slightly longer harnesses. Havign them secured so close to the back fo the seat means that in an accident there is no give in the harness. If they were a bit longer then there is a little more slack...and sounds silly but less likely to injure your internals/eyes etc

  • 3 years later...

Rather than start a new thread, I thought this was the best place for my question.

Can anyone see a problem with mounting my harness like this ?

post-1397-1289901769_thumb.jpg

The harness goes over the top of the harness bar, and down to the factory mounting points. It maintains the required angle that CAMS recommends from the seat to the harness bar.

I think you'll get away with it.

But personally I'd wrap it around the taxi bar.

Yeah, I didn't know whether terminating it too close to the drivers seat would be bad, as some of the earlier comments suggest. Be nice to have some give in the straps in a big accident.

Yeh, wrap it around the bar and dont use eyelets . There are two schools of thought regarding strap lengths.

Some WRC guys etc all use mega short straps due to the potential of roll overs and impacts that will distort the cage. So any cage distortion etc can result in a loose harness and driver/navigator not being 100% secure.

The trade off is with short straps there is no "damping" in a big accident. Even if the stretch is only in mm, longer straps dampen the Gs the body is subjected to in a major impact and can help reduce the bruising of internal organs etc

So there is no right or wrong.

  • 3 months later...

Dont need to tie them off. Just use the buckle. This is how i have mine

med_gallery_462_50_86074.jpg

med_gallery_462_50_86078.jpg

Just being a pedantic bugger here, but strictly speaking, you shouldn't leave the loops loose like in those photos. Page 27 of the Schroth manual talks a bit about it.

There's plenty of good reading in the manual, but some of it is very pedantic, probably like the example above. Still, I comply where reasonably possible. They also have some interesting insights into 3" vs 2" belts, and 5pt / 6 pt belt mounting. Good reading for anyone wanting to fit harnesses.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Has equal chance of cleaning an AFM and f**king an AFM. I think you can work out what happened. When the Hitachi ECU sees the AFM die and goes into the associated limp mode, then it will start and run just fine, because it ignores the AFM and just runs on idle maps that will do what it needs to get it going. But there is no proper load signal, so that's about all it can do. My suggestion? If you don't want to go full aftermaket ECU, then get some R35 GTR AFM cards and some housings to put them in, in the stock location, and Nistune the ECU. Better to do a good upgrade than just replace shitty 40 year old tech with the same 40 year old tech.
    • So my car was recently having trouble starting on initial crank, I would need to feather the gas for it to start up but besides that it would start and run fine. So I clicked the idle air control valve (with throttle body cleaner) and cleaned the MAF sensors (with MAF cleaner). The start up issue was fixed and now the car turns over without the assist of the throttle, but the car is in limp mode and wont rev past 2.5k RPM. From what I understand the IACV would not put the car in limp mode, so I am to believe it is the MAF sensors, but it was running fine before and now I cant get it out of limp mode. I cleaned the MAF made sure the o rings were seated properly. Made sure the cables were plugged in properly, the cables also both read the same voltage. Does anybody know why this is or what could be causing this or how to get it out of limp mode?
    • Ooo I might actually come and bring the kids, however will leave the shit box home and take the daily
    • Thanks. Yeah I realised that there's no way I'd be able to cover the holes with the filler, it would just fall through. Thanks again @GTSBoy!
    • That was the reason I asked. If you were going to be fully bodge spec, then that type of filler is the extreme bodge way to fill a large gap. But seeing as you're going to use glass sheet, I would only use that fibre reinforced filler if there are places that need a "bit more" after you've finished laying in the sheet. Which, ideally, you wouldn't. You might use a blob of it underneath the sheet, if you need to provide some support from under to keep the level of your sheet repair up as high as it needs to be, to minimise the amount of filler you need on top. Even though you're going bodge spec here, using glass instead of metal, the same rules apply wrt not having half inch deep filler on the top of the repair. Thick filler always ends up shitting the bed earlier than thin filler.
×
×
  • Create New...