Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As the title says here is a dyno sheet for a set gt-rs's on a 2.9l gtr engine. It needs bigger injectors as you can see it hasn't fallen over yet. Will post another sheet once the bigger injectors go in.

all the usual mods have been done, including these relavant ones;

gt-rs turbos

uas extrude honed manifolds

ces race style dumps and front pipe

trust tr exhaust

hks 280 10.7 intake, 288 11.0 exhaust cams

1mm o/s intake valves

cnc ported head

cp forged pistons

eagle h beam rods

stroker crank

power fc

z 32 afms

any questions just ask.

this run is at 16 pounds, pump fuel and injectors at max duty cyclepost-9006-1149294536.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/120686-rb26-gt-rs-dyno-result/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Nice result, but as per the above posts I agree that you have more power to come as the curve is still rising.

You have a similar setup to me Gav's Dyno Graph, however note that I have shorter final gears from a GTS4, so a direct km/h comparison isn't possible.

I still have some mixed emotions over the GT-RS terbs, however it is apparent (to me at least) that to get the best from these turbs on a 2.8L you still need to get some serious airflow through the engine. Big revs, high lift/long duration cams (I'm changing my Step 2 264 IN to a 270 duration) and head porting really makes a difference.

Good luck and drop me a PM if you want to chat.

Cheers

Gav

hey guys, to answer some of the questions, its a modified rb 30 crank, eagle rb26 rods, this may sound strange but i dont even know what BP on that dyno chart means (im an engine machinist, and know very little about dyno set up), only just got the car back so not sure what rpm it hits full boost at but ill let you know.

BP is the barometric pressure. The usual is around 101 or there abouts. At a lower atmospheric BP, the engine will make less power due to the decreased density of the air. So with a lower BP, Shootout mode will correct the reading (ie inflate it) to match what the engine would make at roughly 101 (or whatever the Shootout mode considers standard). So like the temperature probe, false readings can give misleading dyno results. Ie low BP = increased power just like high ITs = increased power.

Anyways nice power man, keep up the good work. Once its finalised it must be a real beast, not that it isnt now already! And yeah, more details please!

I modified the crank, so that i could use a 26 block, instead of an rb 30 block, so that all the outside components would fit up with out modification. The pistons are a custom order, with 22mm pin, the only rod modificatonn, is re-bushing to 22mm pin

Very interesting. So I assume you offset ground the crank to de stroke it a bit? Did you hardchrome it first, or are you running custom big end shells?

Was there enough meat in the ringlands to run such a low pin height (and 22mm pins)?

The crank is de-stroked slightly, and heavily modified, using std rb26 shells (rb30 big ends are larger than rb26). Yeah the ring lands are fine, the pin is high, but no higher than on a lot of other long stroke engies. Details on the crank mods sound vague, but i dont have exact measurments of what i did. i made templates of the shapes i made everything so i can do it again, and am in the process of figuring out if i can offer the conversion at an economical price (there are a lot of hours of labour in the modifications). To do all the mods you need a lathe, mill, crank grinder and engine balancer. But should still be able to do something vastly cheaper than japanese alternatives.

Edited by mark99

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...