Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi I bought my Ceffy (RB25) with a plug-in Wolf 3D V4 installed. It's running on base maps atm...

Have heard alot of negative comments about this ecu. What makes them worse than Microtech/EMS/Haltech etc?

The car will be track dedicated for the moment.. Should I be looking at a more street friendly ecu if I plan on rego-ing it later on?

Edit: Running a HKS TO4e kit, stock head/cams, Splitfire coil packs, Suspected Z32 AFM and larger injectors :

Edited by Drift_Limo
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/122054-disadvantages-of-wolf-3d-ecus/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

it comes down to what your tuner can tune. all ecu's have their pro's and con's. some are easier to tune than others. power fc is probably the most common ecu on skylines, but this doesn't mean its the best. from what i have seen it is one the most limited of them, as it can't run auto's very well. it also requires you to retain the air flow meter.

the power fc is also used for the 'wank' factor. people can set things themselves and show off to their mates. but as soon as paulr33 reads this thread he will recommend the power fc over anything else.

but as i said to start off with, talk to your tuner. if there is no one within a 3 hour drive that tunes a power fc it would be a really dumb idea to get one. if your local tuner can tune wolf then keep it. if they tune haltech, then sell it and get a haltech.

Edited by mad082

steer clear of george mays. your best option is to drive to someone who 1. has a dyno, and 2. has experience with your engine and that computer. I have had my own personal experience with george and will say I was extremely dissappointed with the results. I ended up paying alot of money for nothing really.

I ended up taking the car to redcliff dyno where they looked at the tuning and laughed and showed me how dodgy it was, and they arent even wolf distributers! they tuned it up really well and treat any car like their own.

just my experiences with george mays.

Rhys

it comes down to what your tuner can tune. all ecu's have their pro's and con's. some are easier to tune than others.

Too true. The main difference between an ECU that runs solely on the MAP sensor & one that uses the MAF (Actually Power FC uses a combination of MAF & MAP, so this is a fairly gross over simplification on my part) is that getting an engine to run well at idle & low TPS measurements is much easier using airflow meters than manifold pressure. The tune should get done quicker & be cheaper.

power fc is probably the most common ecu on skylines, but this doesn't mean its the best. from what i have seen it is one the most limited of them, as it can't run auto's very well. it also requires you to retain the air flow meter.

An amazingly inept comment. Can you name a PNP ECU that will run both the motor & the auto trannie? Not the Power FC, but then no one with any sense would recommend and ECU install like that simply because it will destroy your transmission in pretty short order.

the power fc is also used for the 'wank' factor. people can set things themselves and show off to their mates. but as soon as paulr33 reads this thread he will recommend the power fc over anything else.

:) People can also quite easily run data loggers, ensure that they are not running too much ignition advance use the peak/hold function on the display etc etc etc.

but as i said to start off with, talk to your tuner. if there is no one within a 3 hour drive that tunes a power fc it would be a really dumb idea to get one. if your local tuner can tune wolf then keep it. if they tune haltech, then sell it and get a haltech.

Unless you are continuously modding your engine, you should only need a tune done once. Get it done properly.

There is nothing inherently wrong with the Wolf.

it also requires you to retain the air flow meter.

the power fc is also used for the 'wank' factor. people can set things themselves and show off to their mates. but as soon as paulr33 reads this thread he will recommend the power fc over anything else.

that is the stupidest shit ive read today

Edited by PHATR32
power fc … what i have seen it is one the most limited of them, as it can't run auto's.

Since everyone else is ripping into you I might as well have go. Kick you while you are down to make sure you don’t get up. :)

I have yet to find an ECU of any BRAND at any PRICE that has the ignition cut and retard logic programming for the Nissan auto. It requires extensive (expensive) programming and no aftermarket ECU manufacturer has been able to justify the cost.

:D cheers :laugh:

PS, yes I have driven a Wolf with an auto and it was shit, rough changes, flaring, slippage etc etc all the things you would expect to encounter without the ignition cut/interrupt and retard programs.

Edited by Sydneykid
Too true. The main difference between an ECU that runs solely on the MAP sensor & one that uses the MAF (Actually Power FC uses a combination of MAF & MAP, so this is a fairly gross over simplification on my part) is that getting an engine to run well at idle & low TPS measurements is much easier using airflow meters than manifold pressure. The tune should get done quicker & be cheaper.

how do you mean? Normal Power FC's use AFM, there is a version that uses a MAP sensor, but they don't use both.

Wolf3d v4 for example can run either MAP or AFM or TPS, or a combination of two of the above.

What I mean is that the inputs to the Power FC (Not the Jetro version) include both the manifold pressure (This is the y axis on the maps) as well as inputs from the AFM's. So the system actually uses both. Most ECU's are more reliant on the MAP high up in the rev/load area of the maps than on the AFM's.

Hope that makes sense.

My wifes car runs a version 4 plus plug in wolf and it is great.

it is very tuneable, it has maps for both ignition and fuel at every 125 rpm and 8 or 9 load maps.

Can run extra injectors as it has it's own microfueller, as a really easy to use laptop program for tuning and setting up, and all the manuals and so on are downloadable in PDF form of the website.

And my wifes car was an auto and it ran fine with the wolf, as a plug in they work ok with the auto, but a wire in needs some work to make the auto computer talk to the wolf.

Thanks everyone for the input..I'm a newb to the engine management side of things so this is a little over whelming lol.

So there should be no idle problems on a manual RB25 with an experienced Wolf tuner?

What does 'Wide band AFR' mean?

Wideband AFR means on the hand controller screen you get real time air/fuel ratio read out.....but you do need a specific wide band oxy sensor.

Idle is fine....the plug in wolf should use the original IAC to do the idle control.

The wolf has pretty much all the maps a motec has with about 1/10 of refineness. They have all the maps in there and some of them work some of them dont. I've tuned two cars with wolf(and thats as many as I ever want to) one was a plugin for a r33 that was fairly standard all the usual mods - exhaust, FMIC, boost control etc. I found that it controlled the idle quite nicely it also seemed that the timing control was quite precise and the fueling was fairly consitent and tunable.

My second expereince was a GTIR pulsar plugin running a gt28 BB turbo, 440cc GTR Inj exhaust, FMIC blah blah balh. The idle control didn't work, the phase angle of the timing was incorrect (minimum timing number was 22 degs - its not likely that you need less than 22deg in a turbo SR20 is it!!!) and the angle couldn't be retarded. Contacted wolf - whats wrong standard ECU idles fine with the timing in the correct spot put plugin wolf in and timing is wrong. THey are still addiment that there phase angles are correct. Now the car had 750cc inj to begin with which where absolutely impossible to tune down low so we replaced them with 440cc inj and it made it just bearable.

The thing I noticed which said it all to me was that when change from 250rpm increments to 125rpm increments and making no changes it then ironed out certain fueling bumps during a WOT ramp - what the??? This indicates that there interpolation between cells is just shithouse which I think is one of the biggest problems thats why you need 600000000 cells to tune a WOLF.

Edited by rob82

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...