Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

There seems to be a lot of people who seem to be using the 0-100km/h time as a bench mark for vehicle performance. However, in my experience the 0-100km/h time is not a great reflection. Why is that? Many of the real world traffic light grand prix events are from rest (0km/h) to the speed limit, or just over it (so about 100km/h), so surely this would be the definitive measure of a cars on street performance? Not really, no. I will use an example to illustrate my point.

Three cars line up at the traffic lights. All three cars have an identical 0-100km/h time. For simplicity, let's make it 10 seconds. The speed limit of this road is 100km/h, so it will be a race to the limit. Nothing illegal here :P

Car number one is a concept vehicle (why it's at the lights I don't know...). An electric vehicle. It doesn't make much power (in fact the top speed is only 100km/h), but it is ultra light, and has 4 in-wheel electric motors giving full torque from 0 rpm, meaning it can charge of the line hard. Car number two is a regular family car. The long geared automatic with big six cylinder power means that acceleration is fairly constant throughout the rev range. The final car has a big turbo, front wheel drive, and manual gearbox. This makes it tricky to get off the line, but once it's hooked up and the turbo spooled, the acceleration is very good.

The image below shows a representation of these three cars' acceleration curves. As you can see, all three will hit 100km/h at the exact same moment.

post-18125-1150336377.gif

(for those who care, the electric car's speed was modelled by a quadratic equation speed=-(time-10)^2+100, the family car by a linear equation speed=10xtime, and the turbo by another quadratic equation speed=time^2)

So it's a race to 100km/h, and all three cars have an identical 0-100km/h time, so it should be a pretty close race, right?

WRONG! :P

The hard launching electric car gets the jump from the start, and wins by a full 45m over the family car, and a whopping 90m over the turbo car - that's about 18 car lengths!!!!

post-18125-1150336397.gif

(For those who care, distances were obtained by integrating the speed equations stated earlier. If I made any errors then they were deliberate and hence I don't care - don't bother pointing them out, the electric car would still win ;) )

This is obviously an extreme case, but I think it illustrates my point nicely. 0-100km/h times are stupid.

Edited by Big Rizza
  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So basically you're saying distance covered in x amount of seconds is more important than 0-100 times...... say, like a 1/4 mile race? ;)

You're right, but you could put money to say that a car that does 0-100 quicker than another cars 0-100 will also cover more distance, hence beat it 9 times out of 10.

In general a car that is quicker over the quater mile usually has a quicker 0-100 as well...................

Big Rizza,

Props for such a well thought out post. you have much more spare time than me ;). That is really something to think about.

I hope I don't get beaten by a ful sik electric car.

i was sitting there thinking your maths was screw up and they would all be the same... until i thought some more. a slightly sideways look at it is to look at quarter mile times and speeds. a mate of mine had a turbo exa that ran a 13.1 at 91mph, while his borther had a natro r31 that ran a 14.0 at 97mph. the exa would get of the line great, but didn't have the puff at high speed to keep pulling, whereas the skyline was hard to launch but had the balls up top to get the speed. so their 0 to 91mph time could've been the same, but the skyline would've done it in less distance.

a better indication of power is rolling starts, like 40 to 80, or 40 to 100. 0 to 100 is too dependant on traction. thats why wrx's have such low numbers, but in rolling starts they get beaten by rwd cars.

I think mention also needs to be made of 0-100 and 400m times for 4WD cars (e.g. GT-R's and WRX's). These rely on redline launches that not only cause serious damage to the gearbox, but are unlikely to occur in everyday drag racing.

I think a more appropriate 0-100 or 400m time would have to include a normal RPM point at which the clutch is released. This would go some length to explaining why an RZ Supra is so much quicker than a GT-R, although they both manage 13 second quarters.

And while we're on the topic of performance figures, I hate hp and kw readouts more than anything else - worse yet because people put so much stock into them. But that's a topic for another post.

So what time will my car do 0-100metres? ;)

I dont have an front mount yet, also what will it do after i install a bov valve?

Can you also tell me how much boost is safe, if i only do 100 metres?

Any help would be appreciated, i tried a search but there were too many answers to my questions.

So i couldnt find any of the right answers i wanted to hear.

Edited by nissky
OK.....so based on your maths, what would the actual quarter mile ET and speed be for all cars?

I chose those formulas with the 0-100km/h sprint in mind, and to extend them outside that will make them less representitive of a real world situation - they are simply too primitive to be extrapolated and still reflect real world situations. Particularly the turbo car, which by the formula will keep on accelerating faster and faster at a rediculous pace, but for the fun of it I will do it anyways :P

Due to the electric car reaching max speed at 100km/h, the after 10 seconds the family car will start closing the gap. Similarly, after 10 seconds, the faster acceleration of the turbo car at high speed means it will start running down both the family car and the electric car.

At the 15.0 second mark, the turbo car will catch the family car.

At the 15.4 second mark, the turbo car will catch the electric car.

At the 15.8 second mark, the family car will catch the electric car.

The turbo car runs a 16.3 at 265.69km/h (see what I mean about unreallistic :D)

The family car runs a 17.0 at 170km/h

The electric car runs a 17.7 at 100km/h

post-18125-1150344395.gif

Whilst the 0-100km/h was a reallistic enough to show what could happen in the real world, this quarter mile situation is unlikely.

Even more unlikely is the turbo's standing kilometer - 22.1 seconds at 490 km/h. :P

EDIT: Oh, and here is the speed graph for the vehicles :P

post-18125-1150344867.gif

And the turbo car does 0-1000km/h in 37.1 seconds, and is accelerating at over 60 g's by that point ;) .

Edited by Big Rizza

Electric cars aren't gay. Have you seen that new Lexus forget what model it is, but's a big v8 with electric engine as well and it goes so damn hard and quite good on fuel for a big v8. They look awesom as well.

I'll try and dig up a website on it.

Electric cars aren't gay. Have you seen that new Lexus forget what model it is, but's a big v8 with electric engine as well and it goes so damn hard and quite good on fuel for a big v8. They look awesom as well.

I'll try and dig up a website on it.

No V8 for the Lexus GS hybrid. It's a V6 with the power of a V8 and the economy of a 4cyl. Apparently.

Dunno if that was what you were referring to... There will probably be a V8 hybrid in the new Lexus LS, but that's not here yet.

Edited by Big Rizza

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It is a kunfine Android screen . Does anyone know the wirering diagram of the fuga ??
    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
×
×
  • Create New...