Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Buddy, put that ban sign down before I grab it and beat your head with it.

No need to be a baby, I am stating facts here.

..... Before you beat my head with it? I believe that constitutes a threat - something that this forum doesn't allow.

Besides mate, I'm not getting aggressive with you. I don't see the point behind you coming here and trying to agitate people... that's all. Anyway, I'm going to stop this keyboard war and continue on with my life :ermm:

***Grabs popcorn, sits down this could get interesting***

HAHAHA :P

..... Before you beat my head with it? I believe that constitutes a threat - something that this forum doesn't allow.

Besides mate, I'm not getting aggressive with you. I don't see the point behind you coming here and trying to agitate people... that's all. Anyway, I'm going to stop this keyboard war and continue on with my life :ermm:

HAHAHA :P

Wasn't threatining you fella... Do you really think I could reach into the monitor, grab the 1cm ban sign, and beat you with it?

Anyway, wasn't trying to agitate anyone. I am genuinely curious, how do you get wheel spin, going 160km/h, with 230rwkw and 255 tyres?????

As I said before, I have 350rwkw, and my car doesn't sping the tyres going 160km (maybe if I hit a bump).

This is why I think it's a load of crock, but please, feel free to explain and prove me wrong ;)

go sideways yo..

WINNER!!!

Get some speed up, swing the car one side, kick the clutch, come off a bit and flick the other way for the corner, plant your foot and off you go!

Try it sometime.

Edited by StinkyPoo

wow, twas a funny read indeed, thanks to titan i can actually bear reading the forums again (got the displayed good) was good to see everyone again, and to mee some new peoples.

i swang by the musem for funsies on the way home, driving past the bombadores i mangaged to set an alarm off, lol, i didnt think my exhuast was that loud, roflcopter,

take it easy team

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...