Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Could i get this VIN number checked please - 6U9000BCNR33024253.

I gave you the Australian VIN number for this car in my last post, which you advised would not be recorded as it is not a genuine Nissan VIN.

The genuine Nissan VIN is BCNR33024253, however I placed "6U9000" before it.

Hopefully it is recorded on the fast software, and it should be a 1996 R33 GTR V-Spec Midnight Purple.

Cheers!

In the FAST software there are 2 boxes; one with the code (BCNR33 in this case), and one with "serial" number (024253 in this case)

So the easy way to represent the VIN is: BCNR33-024253

Anyway here it is:

post-39244-1273018468_thumb.png

Could someone please run this VIN for me?

Also any options fitted?

BCNR33-041755

Cheers

Well the option codes are in the "Model" box on the FAST Screenshot I posted just before, in your case: GGJPRWFR33ZDA-AQ-C

additionally, if you can read Japanese here are the Model-code-to-Options conversion screens:

post-39244-1273019202_thumb.png

The top part is characters 1 through 13 and the bottom bit is 14-18

I marked the options listed in your Model code with little red lines... but most of it is Japanese Characters...

And YES the program is set to English, it just doesn't have translations for options unfortunately...

EDIT: here are my best guesses:

Character 1: Body type, (number of doors) (in this case "G" == 2 door)

Character 2-3: Engine (in this case "GJ" == RB26DETT)

Character 4: Type of drive (in this case "P" == 4WD)

Character 5: NO IDEA, but only one option

Character 6: Spec level (in this case "W" == GTR V or GTR N1)

Character 7: Transmission option (in this "F" == case 5 speed)

Character 8-10: Always "R33"

Character 11: Fuel system?? (in this case, "Z" == I'm not sure)

Character 12: NO IDEA

Character 13: NO IDEA, but only one option

Characters 14 to 18: NO IDEA sorry

hope this helps!

Gaspard

Edited by Gaspard
Well the option codes are in the "Model" box on the FAST Screenshot I posted just before, in your case: GGJPRWFR33ZDA-AQ-C

additionally, if you can read Japanese here are the Model-code-to-Options conversion screens:

post-39244-1273019202_thumb.png

The top part is characters 1 through 13 and the bottom bit is 14-18

I marked the options listed in your Model code with little red lines... but most of it is Japanese Characters...

And YES the program is set to English, it just doesn't have translations for options unfortunately...

EDIT: here are my best guesses:

Character 1: Body type, (number of doors) (in this case "G" == 2 door)

Character 2-3: Engine (in this case "GJ" == RB26DETT)

Character 4: Type of drive (in this case "P" == 4WD)

Character 5: NO IDEA, but only one option

Character 6: Spec level (in this case "W" == GTR V or GTR N1)

Character 7: Transmission option (in this "F" == case 5 speed)

Character 8-10: Always "R33"

Character 11: Fuel system?? (in this case, "Z" == I'm not sure)

Character 12: NO IDEA

Character 13: NO IDEA, but only one option

Characters 14 to 18: NO IDEA sorry

hope this helps!

Gaspard

Thanks mate, Appreciated

hey, if i give you my vin number does this program tell you the engine number?

if so

6u90000ecr3302434

can it please me sent in a private message to me urgently.

private message, why?

I assume you meant: ECR33-002434

here it is:

post-39244-1273054888_thumb.png

From the program we can see it's an R33

Model year: 1993/August

Color code: QM1

Body type: 2K (probably 2 door)

Engine: RB25DET

Steering: HICAS

Driveline: 2WD

Spec level: GTS25T/M

Transmission: Manual 5 Speed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...