Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys can someone fast this please. Should standard gtr have a number 7 at the end of the code? Its a 1992

What do 92 n1 body code usually look like?

Thanks

VIN.jpg

Your VIN is normal, how a standard VIN looks like.

N1's have a "ZN" not "AA" in the Model Number.

Can somebody please decode this for me

BNR32 310473

KBNR32RBFS8AA

thank you

VIN1.jpg

V-Spec II.

  • 2 weeks later...

Can someone fast hr33 005443 for me... it comes up in mine but without paint color??? Need to know what silver it is. Cheers in advanced

There were complications in you VIN.

Take a pic of you Blue Plate in the engine bay and post it here and let's have a look.

Pretty sure 1n4 is the paint but was wondering if my fast has an issue?? Guess we answered that...and yes the firewalls bent...along with a lot of the body...parts car

All good!

Ok here is it.

1N4 = Mixture of KL0 (Silver) and KM1 (Grey Metallic)

  • Like 1

Would someone be able to tell me BNR32 219723 please? :)

IF the model is KNBR32RXFS AA does that mean it's a V-spec due to no numbers at the end? Cheers

VIN.jpg

Yes but since your GTR was built in June 1992, it's only a Base Model.

V-Spec's were built in February 1993 onward.

Can you check what year is it?

thanks for help,

cheers

The Production Month of your GTR is March 1998.

VIN.jpg

Yes but since your GTR was built in June 1992, it's only a Base Model.

V-Spec's were built in February 1993 onward.

The Production Month of your GTR is March 1998.

Wouldn't be hat mean mine would be a V-Spec since built in June 1993?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...