Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The one thing that no one has seemed to mention throughout this thread is "why the hell would your tuner take your care to such extremes when he (or she) knows it is dangerous to the engine at that point"

330rwkw or hp; from a stock set of injectors... I'm no expert but I'm going to ASSUME that at this power your injectors would be at 99.99% duty cycle. The tuner would be able to see this if they were doing their job correctly; shouldn't they stop and warn you that your car could blow up?

When I got my car tuned (has pretty much everything except for injectors as well... the tuner stopped at the first instance and he warned that if he kept going for more power; I ran the risk of blowing up my motor. Even when I asked him if there were any other ways of doing it; he insisted that the session ended and I went away and got injectors.

I wonder who tuned this car and why they would keep pushing it despite the apparent risks.

I believe this was back when a certain workshop believed the wolf had superior fuel injection control and was able to flow more fuel through standard injectors vs say a powerfc using the same stock injectors. so the result was they kept trying to get more and more power on stock injectors and it went bang, like everyone said it would

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hey guys sorry for late reply. i dont have the internet at home so im at work currently. will post dyno sheet up on weekend for u. YES the figures were extremely lean. over 13:1. It was done at hiu torque performance dyno day. i told him to watch the air fuel ratio coz i'd not had it dyno'd since after run in but the a/f's were way too lean. it run about 11psi then spikes to 15 at 5500rpm you'll see that in the gragh when i post it up. run was done bout 3pm in afternoon and was in 3rd gear. i havent changed injectors on it n its still running stock management(that i know of) although i dont have a speed cut anyway for some reason. theres always critics so i dont mind the critisism. anymore questions i'll be happy to answer

  • 3 weeks later...
2 pages full of doughters and only reply is he has shitty boost control???????

and possibly the worst graph known to man, if thats what you wanted? .... short of that one in the KKR thread though, thats even better and it HAS an ECU

Although, the boost delivery is extremely interesting as its only got the same power as the stock turbo for what, 85% of the RPM range, it only peaks in the last bit, so essentially the car really isnt any better than stock at all.

I suspect thats to avoid the mid-range shutdown that most people get when a car ramps onto boost with the stocker ECU. Its simply making a peak figure.

Mid-range = nothing

Low-end = nothing

Extreme high end = power spike

Which is totally uncharacteristic of the GCG hi-flows.

I bet if taken to the strip, the car wont run a much better time than that with a stock turbo :)

Got any figures/graphs from any of the other cars that day? :O

yeah i know im trying to figure out the boost spike issue aswell. boost controller was all the way down, suppose to run 7psi but it cant hold it. was at hi torque dyno day bro im not making it up. why;s it so hard to beleive?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...