Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks man

Yeah didn't get much of a chance to take many pictures, plan was to take heaps but ended up driving most of the day

I reckon it needs spacers to get a better fit but cbf with spacers so I am just going to slam it and try and keep it legal height. Should look a lot better when its lowered

Cheers Chris. Yep original paint colour. The Series 2 Gunmetal (KN6 from memory) is slightly darker or a different/ more pearl or something. The front of the car has been resprayed though as it had a dodgy front bumper paint blend in the bonnet. Mic @ Micolour fixed that up for me though. Looking at some new rims so it may look a little different soon.

Is it back on the road Al!?

looking good, man it must be nice to have it all sorted... you will have to take me for a spin :(

Yep Nick, all sorted and back in force :D

Feels awesome on the road and could not be happier with the package; 325rwkw with full boost by 3000rpm :P

Next time we meet up, just come and ask for a spin, but best place would probably be at the next DECA. So disappointed that DECA masters has been cancelled :D

325rwkw and full boost by 3000rpm... f%#k me... you must have shares in a tire company;) in gear acceleration must be pretty special... I bet it feels good on the road with the 3L, so easy to drive hey

yeah sad about deca! I might go on the cruise planned for the 28th

heres are some of my brother old skyline which was done by iq auto,, but to bad he sold it to guy that came down from qlds

it got ba headlights

IMG022.jpg

This car was parked close to my house (B**** Cls., Delahey). Always wondered if he was on SAU and what happened to it, as i hadn't seen it for a while.

325rwkw and full boost by 3000rpm... f%#k me... you must have shares in a tire company;) in gear acceleration must be pretty special... I bet it feels good on the road with the 3L, so easy to drive hey

yeah sad about deca! I might go on the cruise planned for the 28th

Exactly Nick! Very easy to drive and VERY tractable on low boost (315rwkw :cool:), also get better fuel economy: 410km/45ltrs.

The boost switch only gives a 15rwkw peak power differance, but the low/mid power and torque increase is just insane and breaks traction in 3th, using in-gear acceleration (ie: use 3rd gear, cruise at 70km, then stomp the accerator: instant loss of traction :down:).

Gear acceleration is just awesome, even fifth gear feels like an acceleration gear.

heres are some of my brother old skyline which was done by iq auto,, but to bad he sold it to guy that came down from qlds

it got ba headlights

Of course someone from QLD bought it.

Bright paint, huge kit. All they need now is the silly numberplates no one can understand :dry:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...