Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guess he isnt the Veilside-type, IMO they've made some wicked kits, Fortune's for example but they're always taking a walk on the edge :banana:

yeah i was thinking he knew something about veilside that i dont..they do make gd kits, check that RX7 out of tokyo drift ,that thing is awesome.plus just about all of their cars are 1000hp, but my kit is,5 yrs old maybe just a little out of date,,,

nah nothing wrong with how they are made as such.. they just put ur reputation through the floor most despised body "enhancements" ever.. in 05 yeh probaly woulda got away with it these days well yeh... not really

piggaz one word clean!

Nur33 - Looks the goods, and looking at that engine bay I'm assuming she's got some punch.

Those front air ducts where the indicators sit and the Nismo ZTUNE style bonnet are similar styling mods to my car.

While I'm at it might aswell post up mine....

gallery_1569_106_158120.jpg

gallery_1569_106_129332.jpg

gallery_1569_106_27398.jpg

gallery_1569_106_103597.jpg

:D

Was looking for some ideas and came across this beast! Where did you get the bonnet from? Why are you selling your brake setup? or they are sold already?

:)

This is mine :bunny:

4162547610_36fd5340fb_b.jpg

on the track

post-31999-1265443610_thumb.jpg

Edited by HKS26T
Was looking for some ideas and came across this beast! Where did you get the bonnet from? Why are you selling your brake setup? or they are sold already?

:happy:

This is mine :cool:

4162547610_36fd5340fb_b.jpg

on the track

LOL...

Bonnet was bought through Unique Autosports about four years ago, unfortunately they can't get them anymore.

If you really want one I've seen them on Yahoo auctions.

The only reason I'm getting rid of my brakes is that I got my hands on a complete front/rear V8 supercar Alcon setup.

Unfortunately the current brakes are sold. New setup is going on in the next few weeks...

Very neat car you have!! Those Autoselect canards are a nice bit of gear. What rims are those? Volk TE37 top secret edition?? Is the car registered?

well ,

i went to clear the original one for : bald tyres , no spare , no high beams

when the dick that was clearing it said , wait here the traffic cop wants to have a look at this

officer dick bag comes out with his book , measures my eyebrow height and says its too low by 2"

then proceeds to write me out a defect notice for it , and its a major so needs a full inspection

talk about getting f**ked over >_>

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...