Jump to content
SAU Community

Do You Have Air Con On Your Car?


GKTECH
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ditched my aircon, but was more of a neccessity to fit the intercooler in nicely. Could have moved it but I never used it anyway (I dont even think it worked) so out it came!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i think he his plan is that by removing the aircon he can run shorter cooler pipes so he has better throttle response.

what you have to take into consideration is that if you have the cooler pipes too short you tighten the bends, which makes the air have to change direction more suddenly. if that pic is of the setup ypu are trying to shorten, then there isn't much you can do before you start compromising air speed.

another option would be to fit a smaller cooler. removing 6 inches of cooler will reduce the air volume by more than removing 6 inches of piping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you plan to achieve throttle response? Stop being so secretive :D

Not being secretive.

Untimately the aim is to keep the intercooler piping as short as possible and with as little bends as possible.

We can play around with intercooler sizes, end tank designs... the sky is the limit.

At the same time using chinese factories to keep the prices down but keep quality up to a good level (as seen with the bar and plate cores that people are using in 400+ rwkw cars).

We recently did a project for the VL guys which can be seen here: http://www.calaisturbo.com.au/showthread.php?t=78364 (the aim of that project was to keep the intercooler hidden aswell as avoiding any holes being cut in the chassis)

Greg

Edited by EXAUNV
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not talking about losing the aircon due to the power loss. I'm talking about losing the aircon for space in the engine bay/front of the car.

dude, SR20 is GIVING you room if your not using an RB20.

room should be your friend.

Keep the aircon - or suffer in the heat (in silence) :D

300rwkw - never going to get rid of my aircon. I dont care what i have to do

And if you notice a throttle difference with an extra bend or two, i'll hand you a medal ;)

Cause you wont notice it at all IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dude, SR20 is GIVING you room if your not using an RB20.

room should be your friend.

Keep the aircon - or suffer in the heat (in silence) :D

300rwkw - never going to get rid of my aircon. I dont care what i have to do

And if you notice a throttle difference with an extra bend or two, i'll hand you a medal ;)

Cause you wont notice it at all IMO.

You think that there wont be a noticable difference going from a Hyrbid style intercooler kit to the one I'm using in my R32? (or any other cooler kit that's remotely similiar)

I'm not talking about making kits for an SR in the skyline range as there is clearly enough room (as seen in my R32), but I'm asking to see how many people are actually using their aircon and how many people would lose it for a setup like this.

With the SR range of cars, it's not necessary to lose your air con.

Greg

Edited by EXAUNV
Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm. the ac compressor turns of at any major load any way :D

just the extra heat through the radiator youve gotta wory about. its gives NO LOSS OF POWER at all.

so just bask in the nice chilled enviroment lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm. the ac compressor turns of at any major load any way :D

just the extra heat through the radiator youve gotta wory about. its gives NO LOSS OF POWER at all.

so just bask in the nice chilled enviroment lol

We're not talking in terms of power loss from the AC compressor.

We're talking in terms of space in the engine bay.

Greg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do a search for some of the many posts by sydneykid regarding shorter cooler pipes and how removing 20cm of pipe is going to make no difference, but to do the maths

at 3000 rpm and zero boost / vac your 2.5L engine is consuming 3750L of air per minute or 62.5L per second

assuming u save 20cm of pipe and that its 2.5inch pipe that will have a volume of approx. 1.5L in that pipe.

so your engine will consume that air in 0.024 of a second, now add boost etc....to the equation and is it worth sacrificing your aircon for 0.024s of throttle response

sorry if this is wrong but as my understanding goes this is how it'd work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do a search for some of the many posts by sydneykid regarding shorter cooler pipes and how removing 20cm of pipe is going to make no difference, but to do the maths

at 3000 rpm and zero boost / vac your 2.5L engine is consuming 3750L of air per minute or 62.5L per second

assuming u save 20cm of pipe and that its 2.5inch pipe that will have a volume of approx. 1.5L in that pipe.

so your engine will consume that air in 0.024 of a second, now add boost etc....to the equation and is it worth sacrificing your aircon for 0.024s of throttle response

sorry if this is wrong but as my understanding goes this is how it'd work

20cm's of pipe?

You'll be losing around 2 meters, aswell as around 600+ degrees worth of bends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats still only .2 seconds

In theory, pollsibly...

One of the drift cars we used to sponsor (180/s15 front) had a FMIC install, it's now running a V mount setup and the difference in throttle response is incredible!! I can't time it, but you sure can feel the difference.

If the RB guys aren't interested in these sorts of kits, that's not a problem. We'll just make them for the SR's.

Greg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the concept of a vmount setup?

Any crude diagrams or picture examples?

What I really want though... :)

An FMIC setup that uses the std piping route. I would like an fmic to fill the whole front bar inlet as to let as much as possible air pass through to the radiator.

Currently as can be seen the end tanks block of a considerable amount of the front bar.

The core i'm using is apparently a spearco bar/plate core 450x260x90 *from memory* with sligh off centrally located inlet/outlets. being center located makes it easy for the hot fmic inlet pipe to do a 2 x 90 degree turns to enter the fmic (drivers side). It runs crappy 2.25" piping. :)

post-382-1156551019.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the concept of a vmount setup?

Any crude diagrams or picture examples?

What I really want though... :)

An FMIC setup that uses the std piping route. I would like an fmic to fill the whole front bar inlet as to let as much as possible air pass through to the radiator.

Currently as can be seen the end tanks block of a considerable amount of the front bar.

The core i'm using is apparently a spearco bar/plate core 450x260x90 *from memory* with sligh off centrally located inlet/outlets. being center located makes it easy for the hot fmic inlet pipe to do a 2 x 90 degree turns to enter the fmic (drivers side). It runs crappy 2.25" piping. :(

I don't have any pictures handy, but the overall idea is to have the radiator sitting on a 45 degree angle and your intercooler sitting on a 45 degree angle, the overall the advantage is that the pipes are shorter, and neither your intercooler or radiator are getting less air flow. The disadvantage to this setup is heat soak.

Greg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So last night pulling away from the lights, I lost power for about 1 second. Bit weird, but I kept driving... 5 minutes later the pump completely dies. When I tried to start the car, the pump won't even prime.  I left the car for about an hour, tried to start it and it all appeared fine. Pump primed, car started, got the fuel pressure I should have.... Start driving home, 5 minutes later it dies again. I'm stuck in a shit spot this time going up hill with a car right behind me, so I just let the car continue to turn over while praying to the fuel pump gods. After about 2 minutes of turning the engine over, the fuel pump came back to life and I got home (only about another 5 min away).  So I've been digging around online, it seems like the 525 fuel pumps really don't like to be run at 100% all the time. I've found quite a few examples online of people killing their Walbro 525 pumps within about a year of usage when they are run without PWM.  So, my pump is an Aeroflow 525 (AF49-1057) and I've been running it at 100% without PWM. I'm thinking the Aeroflow 525 didn't like being run at 100% and has burnt itself up.  I really am sick of dealing with fuel pump issues, my current thoughts are -  1. Use a Walbro 450 and run it without PWM. It seems like these pumps hold up pretty well to being run at 100% all the time. I only make about 350kw and can't see me making any more power any time soon so this is probably a fine option.  2. Get a Walbro 525, run it with PWM. I know doing this will annoy me as I feel like with only 350kw, its extra expense that I don't "need" and I'll be thinking the whole time while setting it up that I should have gone with option 1. I know I'll be happy with this option when its setup and running, its only the initial setup frustration and cost as an issue.  3. Get a Walbro BKS1001 brushless pump. This is the fu*k it I'm already going PWM, might as well go full retard. This option just seems better in every way, with the only downside being cost. But I don't know much about this pump so I could be wrong.  Happy to get everyone's thoughts before I go digging around in the fuel tank again. 
    • Doing it this weekend. For sure this time. Thank you forum gods.  And im running map sensor now with the haltech. Still have the AFMs attached to the mushroom dome shaped air filter things
    • Actually, it is probably pretty legit. I mean, it's still woke feminazi bullshit academia, but you would have to agree that it is very likely that there would be a correlation between wanting a loud exhaust and scoring at the unpleasant end of the scales for dark triad personality traits. The fact that they found it didn't correlate with narcissism and only with psychopathy and sadism definitely shows that the loud exhaust thing is more of a "f**k you" than a "look at me", and I reckon that rings pretty close to most of the dickheads who take it to the extreme. Remember, this is correlation with tendency to be closer to one end of a personality trait scale than the other end. Of course someone who is at the literal opposite end of the psychopathy scale is going to be so considerate of others that they wouldn't even think about wanting to upset anyone with a loud exhaust. So the finding isn't that "you are a psychopath". Just that you score more towards that end of the scale than someone who doesn't like loud exhausts (on average, not necessarily even for specific individuals).
    • Blitz ER34 at some point hopefully, should be allowed in Gr3 if they do.
    • Stock R33 boost control, with the exhaust, and FMIC done, will boost creep. There is no tuning around it if it is the factory boost solenoid.   If it has an aftermarket electronic boost controller, the settings/mapping can be altered in it.   Oil could be anything as mentioned, however did it ever do it before you did the turbo swap? How much and how often did you drive the car before the swap?   I'm hinging on too much oil supply, or it's not draining properly.   To check, pull the air outlet off the turbo. Is it full of oil? Drop the exhaust at the turbo, does it appears to be oiled/coked? Now pull turbo and check the exhaust manifold, does it appears oiled and coked the same way?   Secondly, the PCV could even be stuffed / not functioning properly and will cause blowing of blue smoke.
×
×
  • Create New...