Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i think he his plan is that by removing the aircon he can run shorter cooler pipes so he has better throttle response.

what you have to take into consideration is that if you have the cooler pipes too short you tighten the bends, which makes the air have to change direction more suddenly. if that pic is of the setup ypu are trying to shorten, then there isn't much you can do before you start compromising air speed.

another option would be to fit a smaller cooler. removing 6 inches of cooler will reduce the air volume by more than removing 6 inches of piping.

How do you plan to achieve throttle response? Stop being so secretive :D

Not being secretive.

Untimately the aim is to keep the intercooler piping as short as possible and with as little bends as possible.

We can play around with intercooler sizes, end tank designs... the sky is the limit.

At the same time using chinese factories to keep the prices down but keep quality up to a good level (as seen with the bar and plate cores that people are using in 400+ rwkw cars).

We recently did a project for the VL guys which can be seen here: http://www.calaisturbo.com.au/showthread.php?t=78364 (the aim of that project was to keep the intercooler hidden aswell as avoiding any holes being cut in the chassis)

Greg

Edited by EXAUNV
I'm not talking about losing the aircon due to the power loss. I'm talking about losing the aircon for space in the engine bay/front of the car.

dude, SR20 is GIVING you room if your not using an RB20.

room should be your friend.

Keep the aircon - or suffer in the heat (in silence) :D

300rwkw - never going to get rid of my aircon. I dont care what i have to do

And if you notice a throttle difference with an extra bend or two, i'll hand you a medal ;)

Cause you wont notice it at all IMO.

dude, SR20 is GIVING you room if your not using an RB20.

room should be your friend.

Keep the aircon - or suffer in the heat (in silence) :D

300rwkw - never going to get rid of my aircon. I dont care what i have to do

And if you notice a throttle difference with an extra bend or two, i'll hand you a medal ;)

Cause you wont notice it at all IMO.

You think that there wont be a noticable difference going from a Hyrbid style intercooler kit to the one I'm using in my R32? (or any other cooler kit that's remotely similiar)

I'm not talking about making kits for an SR in the skyline range as there is clearly enough room (as seen in my R32), but I'm asking to see how many people are actually using their aircon and how many people would lose it for a setup like this.

With the SR range of cars, it's not necessary to lose your air con.

Greg

Edited by EXAUNV
umm. the ac compressor turns of at any major load any way :D

just the extra heat through the radiator youve gotta wory about. its gives NO LOSS OF POWER at all.

so just bask in the nice chilled enviroment lol

We're not talking in terms of power loss from the AC compressor.

We're talking in terms of space in the engine bay.

Greg

do a search for some of the many posts by sydneykid regarding shorter cooler pipes and how removing 20cm of pipe is going to make no difference, but to do the maths

at 3000 rpm and zero boost / vac your 2.5L engine is consuming 3750L of air per minute or 62.5L per second

assuming u save 20cm of pipe and that its 2.5inch pipe that will have a volume of approx. 1.5L in that pipe.

so your engine will consume that air in 0.024 of a second, now add boost etc....to the equation and is it worth sacrificing your aircon for 0.024s of throttle response

sorry if this is wrong but as my understanding goes this is how it'd work

do a search for some of the many posts by sydneykid regarding shorter cooler pipes and how removing 20cm of pipe is going to make no difference, but to do the maths

at 3000 rpm and zero boost / vac your 2.5L engine is consuming 3750L of air per minute or 62.5L per second

assuming u save 20cm of pipe and that its 2.5inch pipe that will have a volume of approx. 1.5L in that pipe.

so your engine will consume that air in 0.024 of a second, now add boost etc....to the equation and is it worth sacrificing your aircon for 0.024s of throttle response

sorry if this is wrong but as my understanding goes this is how it'd work

20cm's of pipe?

You'll be losing around 2 meters, aswell as around 600+ degrees worth of bends.

Thats still only .2 seconds

In theory, pollsibly...

One of the drift cars we used to sponsor (180/s15 front) had a FMIC install, it's now running a V mount setup and the difference in throttle response is incredible!! I can't time it, but you sure can feel the difference.

If the RB guys aren't interested in these sorts of kits, that's not a problem. We'll just make them for the SR's.

Greg

I don't understand the concept of a vmount setup?

Any crude diagrams or picture examples?

What I really want though... :)

An FMIC setup that uses the std piping route. I would like an fmic to fill the whole front bar inlet as to let as much as possible air pass through to the radiator.

Currently as can be seen the end tanks block of a considerable amount of the front bar.

The core i'm using is apparently a spearco bar/plate core 450x260x90 *from memory* with sligh off centrally located inlet/outlets. being center located makes it easy for the hot fmic inlet pipe to do a 2 x 90 degree turns to enter the fmic (drivers side). It runs crappy 2.25" piping. :)

post-382-1156551019.jpg

I don't understand the concept of a vmount setup?

Any crude diagrams or picture examples?

What I really want though... :)

An FMIC setup that uses the std piping route. I would like an fmic to fill the whole front bar inlet as to let as much as possible air pass through to the radiator.

Currently as can be seen the end tanks block of a considerable amount of the front bar.

The core i'm using is apparently a spearco bar/plate core 450x260x90 *from memory* with sligh off centrally located inlet/outlets. being center located makes it easy for the hot fmic inlet pipe to do a 2 x 90 degree turns to enter the fmic (drivers side). It runs crappy 2.25" piping. :(

I don't have any pictures handy, but the overall idea is to have the radiator sitting on a 45 degree angle and your intercooler sitting on a 45 degree angle, the overall the advantage is that the pipes are shorter, and neither your intercooler or radiator are getting less air flow. The disadvantage to this setup is heat soak.

Greg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...