Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ME TOO! I want some 110-115 ron pump bp fuel...where do i get that?

For pump fuel you cant beat the shell optimax extreme...100 ron with some eth in it, get it tuned on that and its your best bet without going to race fuels :D Believe me, race fuel is frikken expensive....we were using martini 110 for a little while...at the time we worked out per litre $6.80 FARK!

Knock is due to too lean a mixture, too much ignition advance, too much boost-related to 1, heating issues, excessive oil in the intake...what happens is somewhere during the compression stroke one or various causes such as the ones listed interrupts the combustion process from occuring at its set time, normally going by the term PRE-ignition is the mixture ignites before its timed moment and rattles the piston side to side causing all sorts of wear n tear and costly damage. That rattle is what is referred to as a KNOCK or PINGING. Other form of knock can probably be more so referred to as PISTON SLAP, which is basically the same event of the piston rattling from side to side, but normally occurs on the power stroke and is more so due to the tolerances being too sloppy or loose and allowing the piston to move around too freely in the bore during normal operation. Both are bad for engine life...specifically piston life :stupid:

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Jut thought I'd add my experiences with ethnol.

The 98 IFS ethnol stuff did make a difference in power in the wifes mazda, but the economy was not the same. I must explain that I filled a tank and drove normally for the whole tank to see the economy. Other tanks, I did tend to put the foot down to experience the noticable difference in torque.

Also, I have a friend that has a VW dune buggy fiberglass thing with a stroker kit, and was setup for drag. They used 100% alcohol in it and the aluminium and other metal component suffered from bad corrosion. Something you wouldn't get with regular fuel. Although that 100% alcohol, you still have to wonder what that extra 10% ethnol would do to some of the metal components in the fuel system.

If you had done a search (“Sydneykid”, “Extreme” and “any date”) you would have found these posts;

February 2006

We have a new project car, an R33GTST that is in need of some TLC. One of the recent upgrades was a Power FC. As most people are aware, the default ignition maps are a little advanced for Optimax, Ultimate or Vortex 98. Not as bad as they used to be for 95 ron fuels, but still a tad. Obviously I will tune it properly eventually , but we have a few mods to go yet and I don’t have the time to tune it multiple times. So the idea was to stick the Power FC in and run it on the default maps for a couple of weeks. On Optimax and Ultimate (didn’t try Vortex) it was reaching knock of 60+ up our usual test hill in 4th gear as logged on the datalogit. The dash warning was also flashing frequently, as it is set for 60, in normal day to day driving around. When the tank was just about empty this week, we filled it up with Optimax Extreme (@ 5 cents a litre more than Optimax). Several runs up the hill and we are not seeing knock over 10. And zero dash warnings in 3 days of normal driving.

Now that is very worthwhile, there is not enough Optimix Extreme around yet for me to tune it exclusively for 100 ron, but it sure will be a useful for the odd track day or run down the ¼.

I will monitor the effects of the ethanol on the fuel lines, o’rings and seals over the next few weeks. The injectors and fuel pump will have to come out shortly so I will check their condition as well. I am not anticipating any problems, but it is still worth checking.

March 2006

After a month (~2,000k's) of running exclusively on Extreme in the R33GTST, I did a fuel filter change on the weekend. Cut it open and no sign of any foreign material, deteriorated fuel hose etc. That means zero effect from the 5% ethanol, as expected. So we will continue to use it.

Current status, after 8 months of running exclusively Shell Optimax Extreme 100 ron.

After 3 fuel filter changes I still haven’t found one sign of fuel system rubber or metal deterioration.

I cleaned the injectors last week and there is not one sign of any effect on them either. I also flow tested them and they performed exactly as they did last time I flow tested them.

Based on the results with the R33GTST, I have now started to use it in the Stagea, which I will be tuning again very shortly to take advantage of the extra performance on offer.

>_< cheers :D

Also depends if you're hitting rev limiter in which case knock value on PFC will show large numbers.

not if everything is working properly. I can nail the limit in my car and knock is no higher than normal.

is 100ron with 10% eth any more expensive? or is it cheaper then say 98 ron

Shell Optimax Extreme 100 ron is 5% ethanol and is around 5 cents litre more than Shell Optimax 98 ron.

>_< cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid

Im psychic, he will say yes it is so long as its readily available so you dont have to drive 25km to get to a bowser that pumps it.

In brisbane were still like that...only like 4 or 5 stations on the northside that have extreme. Pain in the ass sometimes.

Slight comparison....bp 100 octane or (avgas) which comes in 20l drums works out at something like $2.50 per litre, so about 50bux a drum....thats still like 1 dollar more exxy then the extreme >_<

Edited by r33_racer
In your opinion, is it worth it ??

For the extra performance = Yes

That's not just max power but response from the more advanced ignition timing.

Enabling the use of standard Power FC maps = Yes

Let's face it, in performance car terms it's peanuts

60 litres X 5 cents = $3 a week.

>_< cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid

As Gary has pretty obviously pointed out, you really need a re-tune to get the benifits of the ethanol. Ive seen a 22rwkw gain (modified r32 gtr..) from moving from 98 to 100 octane with ethanol in a HPI magazine, they explained that you can put alot more igintion timing into the motor, however it did run abit lean and make less power without being tuned for the new fuel.... something to keep in mind if you have a tuned modified car, if its a stocko it shouldn't hurt.

"Also depends if you're hitting rev limiter in which case knock value on PFC will show large numbers."

'not if everything is working properly. I can nail the limit in my car and knock is no higher than normal."

If you use a std or walbro you may [stress may] get this effect..............they can run a bit lean at the top of the scale!!

Please show an example of this, and explain why knock would be more at the rev limiter?

Ok.

My understanding is that the PFC cuts the revs by cutting fuel. As the revs quickly approach redline the PFC cuts fuel but still maintains ignition timing as per usual. If this happens during an injector cycle and they are shut off prematurely then the air/fuel mixture is a little leaner for that cycle and pre-ignition may occur. The revs drop below the red line and injectors become active again for a bit before hitting redline and fuel cuts out again... etc... Each time this happens, the knock sensor picks it up.

So basically if you rev your engine and dont come off redline quickly you'll see your knock values increase the longer you hold your foot there.

Please correct me if Im wrong, but that is my understanding.

Nah, ignition is cut, not fuel. That why you see big backfires on skylines sitting on the revlimiter.

I'm curious, please explain when, where, etc, you have seen high knock on a engine reving at the revlimiter?

Thanks

no it wont do crap, its all wives tales. but yes putting optimax extreme in your stock ecu'd skyline is likely to achieve less detonation, but nothing more. i wouldnt expect much detonation on 98 premium anyway.

Ok.

My understanding is that the PFC cuts the revs by cutting fuel. As the revs quickly approach redline the PFC cuts fuel but still maintains ignition timing as per usual. If this happens during an injector cycle and they are shut off prematurely then the air/fuel mixture is a little leaner for that cycle and pre-ignition may occur. The revs drop below the red line and injectors become active again for a bit before hitting redline and fuel cuts out again... etc... Each time this happens, the knock sensor picks it up.

So basically if you rev your engine and dont come off redline quickly you'll see your knock values increase the longer you hold your foot there.

Please correct me if Im wrong, but that is my understanding.

does this happen to you? Having spent a little time on the limiter (sometimes on purpose, ie burnout, and sometimes just brushed it on gear change) I have never experienced high knock levels. What knock level do you get in usual driving, and conversely what do you reach when hitting the limiter?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...