Jump to content
SAU Community

Reputable (gtr) Workshops

95_GTR

By 95_GTR,
in New South Wales

 Share

Recommended Posts

gtr jason Rising Star

gtr jason

Posted
Posted
Blah Blah Blah

Let me guess, you didnt bother to go back to them or call them and give them the chance to resolve the problems?

Regarding your boost issue, obviously UAS had a concern about putting any more boost through your engine - would you have preferred them to just wind it up anyway and run the risk of possible engine damage? Come on

mate if you had got your car done with me and there was a problem i would hope you would bring it back so we could sort out the problem because if you didnt and then started talking shit about my workers they would track you down and give you some shit so you should watch what you say i sure john would have taken another look at it for you if you had of given him the chance

Blitz Grand Master

Blitz

Posted
Posted
mate if you had got your car done with me and there was a problem i would hope you would bring it back so we could sort out the problem because if you didnt and then started talking shit about my workers they would track you down and give you some shit so you should watch what you say i sure john would have taken another look at it for you if you had of given him the chance

I should hope your post isnt directed at me Jason, you might want to watch who you quote in your posts :)

wateva Collaborator

wateva

Posted
Posted

Hey everyone i wasnt trying to stir shit, just adding my opinion on a workshop. I did speak to john in person about the problem. I wasnt happy, he wasnt happy and i told him then and there that i would never recommend UAS to anyone. Im surprised a newb to your forums could cause such a fuss people. :P

GoldZilla Grand Master

GoldZilla

Posted
Posted
Hey everyone i wasnt trying to stir shit, just adding my opinion on a workshop. I did speak to john in person about the problem. I wasnt happy, he wasnt happy and i told him then and there that i would never recommend UAS to anyone. Im surprised a newb to your forums could cause such a fuss people. :P

That's right - it's most likely because of the fact that you are new to these forums that you've only received a caution.

Put it this way, if someone uses these forums to say something negative against a business, that business could sue the forum OWNER for defamation, and if that happens the forums may well be shut down as a consequence, and then we ALL suffer... We've built up a good community, and in many cases a new network of friends both online and outside in the real world - lets help it stay that way.

Beer Baron Grand Master

Beer Baron

Posted
Posted
Hey everyone i wasnt trying to stir shit, just adding my opinion on a workshop. I did speak to john in person about the problem. I wasnt happy, he wasnt happy and i told him then and there that i would never recommend UAS to anyone. Im surprised a newb to your forums could cause such a fuss people. :)

it doesn't really matter to me whether you were intentionally trying to stir shit or not. you posted up half a negative story and named a business. I've explained to you that it was against the rules. You either learn from this, or you do it again and I will come down on top of you like a 16 year old virgin on top of Angelina Jolie.

John being a business owner with a reputation that was hard earned and hard to protect has done the right thing and contacted you to see what your exact problem is. So if there is still some issue, then contact him back and resolve it. If not just accept it and move on. The very fact the he asked me to leave your (potentially damaging) comments on an open forum and actually wanted to resolve your problem should indicate to anyone that he owns a workshop worth using.

Anyway, let's all get past it shall we?

Boosted Zed Mentor

Boosted Zed

Posted
Posted
it doesn't really matter to me whether you were intentionally trying to stir shit or not. you posted up half a negative story and named a business. I've explained to you that it was against the rules. You either learn from this, or you do it again and I will come down on top of you like a 16 year old virgin on top of Angelina Jolie.

John being a business owner with a reputation that was hard earned and hard to protect has done the right thing and contacted you to see what your exact problem is. So if there is still some issue, then contact him back and resolve it. If not just accept it and move on. The very fact the he asked me to leave your (potentially damaging) comments on an open forum and actually wanted to resolve your problem should indicate to anyone that he owns a workshop worth using.

Anyway, let's all get past it shall we?

I don't have a problem with someone not recommending or warning others if genuine and preferably consistent poor service but not if exaggerated. Also if one person at a business as seems in this case a mechanic and years ago it seems then it does not mean that business is not good for ever more. I do not know who you are but I have sent a PM to Wateva to find out who and what and where years ago so I can at least see what happened or did not happen. Wateva you wonder why some are taking your post as aggressive or possibly over the top and not asked for anyway but rather where to go. If we were stealing form you or actually doing really bodgy work and did not want to do anything about it then different. It is so rare even though we do some very technical difficult work one can bank on some not understanding or taking things the wrong way or as mentioned can't be pleased. I can't comment on this case at all as I said I don't know who Wateva is or his car and years ago and probably a few thousand Skylines later. I know I always try and do the right thing by customer to the point where I regularly get handles but give customer the benefit of the doubt and warrant and cover costs I am sure few workshops would.

Tell us who you are or PM me with rego details and name and I look up what terrible thing we did.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • GTSBoy
      DeAgostini 1/8 scale BNR32 Nissan Skyline GT-R Nismo

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      That's hilariously putrid!
×
×
  • Create New...