Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey people,

I recently got my rb25 rebuilt about 5000km ago & we have now found out that there is a very big problem with power output etc.

I recently got a PFC installed & the best we could achieve was 138rwkw on .7bar with the following mods

forged piston set 20tho

gtr rods

arp conrod bolt set

race series main bearing set

bigend bearing set

nissan gaskets

nissan cam belt

pfc

fmic

3.5inch full exhaust

avcr (.70 Bar)

cai

stock turbo

stock injectors

Now the problem is not with the tune as we put it onto the dyno before the pfc went in and the best it got was 111rwkw on stock boost! so the was a gain of 27rwkw at the end with the pfc installed., the tuner said that it could have an extremely high static compression ratio or another issue.

so then we thought it was a turbo issue but we pulled it off yesterday & the turbo is fine! which means there something wrong in the motor! we did a leak down test & compression yesterday and these are the results

leak down test: this was done with the car not being started in 2weeks so its dead cold!

1 cld: 7%

2 cld: 5%

3 cld: 5%

4 cld: 5%

5 cld: 9%

6 cld: 6%

compression test: also done cold

1 cld: 120psi

2 cld: 115psi

3 cld: 125psi

4 cld: 125psi

5 cld: 117psi

6 cld: couldn’t do 6 as oil started going everywhere

so the were the results & we still don’t have a clue on what the problem could be! the compression test come up really low but couldn’t that be caused by a low compression ratio?

I guess if any one has had this problem or could shed any light on it that would be good.

Sorry about the crappy post but im not really mechanically minded!

Cheers

Alan

Edited by al_r33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/133169-rebuilt-rb25-problem/
Share on other sites

could be a poorly calibrated dyno?

boost reference is invalid, its less than .7bar possibly?

umm...how come oil went everwhere from cyc 6?

That doesnt sound right at all

Check the timing, if the cams where touched, cam belt is on correct etc etc

why is your cold compression so low? The temperature doesnt affect it too much...its whether its wet or dry that affects the compression dramatically. But that compression should be around what 160-170. What thickness headgasket did you put in it, std nissan one 1.2mm?

atm my money is on the low compression.

i dont know why oil started going everywhere as the motor has heaps off\ parts of it atm!

the dyno is okk as i took it to another one just to see & they bascailly come up the same!

the cams were check and come up fine!

if its low compression how do you fix that?

Cheers

alan

and as for the headgasket i was aware that it was a std one!

Cheers

More importantly not why but where was the oil coming from?

My Rb30det stone cold with 0.040" piston bore clearance was from memory high 150's after a 10degree night. All pots were to my suprise exactly the same with only one (cyl 5) being 1psi down. That was after ~20,000km's.

I just pulled down my rb25 for a rebuild...and when i was checking the compression, i accidently left the oil feed line hanging above cylinder 6....and after checking the first 5 cylinders oil pressure had built up enough to ooze out and straight down no.6 spark plug...well 165 across the board then 240 odd in no.6 lol. First thing i thought of that maybe they did the same thing...however the oil feed on a std turbo is a steel line, so yeh...not sure on that one.

Cubes why do you have such large clearance? What was the spec sheet clearance for your Wiesco's?

The spec sheet on the wiseco pistons stated 0.0040" (from memory) for 24+psi or race.

Sorry I missed a 0 in the previous post. :)

I went a little overkill in the clearance department but suprisingly it only ever so slightly slaps (not noticable to the untrained ear) when cold.

that is very low power. and thats some pretty huge leakdown aswell.

ps. arp dont make bolts for rb's people stick vg30 ones in them (abit dodgy)

umm. are you sure the cam TIMING is corect. is the vct working or jammed?

how often do you need to empty the catchcan?

why was ir rebuilt?

is you cat rooted from the old motor filling it with oil?

Drop the exhaust, b4 the cat and do another dyno run. Keep an eye out on the boost levels, as these can skyrocket if the exhaust was stuffed.

For a fresh rebuild those figures seem very poor.

How good is the reputation of the person that rebuilt the engine? :)

The spec sheet on the wiseco pistons stated 0.0040" (from memory) for 24+psi or race.

Sorry I missed a 0 in the previous post. :)

I went a little overkill in the clearance department but suprisingly it only ever so slightly slaps (not noticable to the untrained ear) when cold.

haha yes 4 thou sounds better, i thought fark 1mm clearance..something not right there. Yeh we ran 0.0020" with the cp's and no conrod oil squirters :) just relying on splash and shes fine, no slap either.

al_r33 what clearances were run with the forged pistons that were put in? And do you have the spec sheet that came with your forgies? Maybe the clearances are way too sloppy and thats why your compression is shitty, power shitty and blowby in excessive amounts??? if thats occurring?

Edited by r33_racer

well that’s the thing the guy who did it knew his sh*t that’s why I found it hard to believe that he built a bad motor!

I don’t have a catch can!

the exhaust was replaced after the rebuild as with the other parts!

the guy who check the cam timing said it was spot on!

so I dunno what’s going on with it!

Cheers

Alan

What have other peoples leakdown percentages been after a rebuild?

When I bought my GTSR(Circa 1987), I got a leakdown test done before purchase and it averaged about 12% across the board which the mechanic said was reasonable for the kms listed on the odometer which stated 130k.

Now for a 5,000km engine to show leakage as high as 9% isnt that a bad sign?

What was the run in procedure? Maybe its a case of the rings having not bed in correctly?

Dude you have a big problem. from what i see here t think it is that the dude that built your engine used to big clearances, causing exessive blowbyand loosing compression. i did the compression test yesterday on a friends GTST R33 S2, with a stock engine and it gave me about 165 psi on all cylinders, it was so good that all were in 1% of each other. the problem i see here is that your engine is pooooooorrrly assembled, have your tuner pull the engine off and take off the head, make him check the piston to bore clearance, the only soultion i can give you if the clearances are to big is that your have to re bore re hone and put bigger pistons in again. 138 kw is even lower than stock, so id advise to check your engine again. i wish i could live in aussi and be of assistance but cicumstances state that i have to give my advice from the other side of the planet

i bascally drove the car for 1500km on no boost & no higher than 3500rpm.

can anyone suggest how you would fix this sort of problem if the compression is too low?

Even though i really don't think this has caused any problem, i beleive the problem lies with a poorly built engine :), this method of bedding in an engine is not the best.

If i get my engine rebuilt, i will be loading the boot with heavy items (40kg bags of cement), to add load. Drive normally as if you are trying to conserve fuel. Then every 200-300km give it a quick strong squirt. An engine is best bedded with varying loads.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...