Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

its all on and running smooth.

i need a tune as knock starts heading towards 90, but at 13 psi it pulls like a train.

very smooth power.

like the falcon xr6 turbo just with lag.

havent done enough kays as yet to work out when boost hits etc. but id say around 4500 things start to happen fairly quickly.

Sorry if this has been answered before but what are the advantages of an internal gate over an external gate, aside from the obvious cost factor.

Edited by Rolls

Disco

Thanks for the pics buddy.. You know I'm a Pic man. :P

------------

Rolls

Pros:

Compact & cost saving

Cons:

If the internal gate hasn't been designed correctly its quite possible boost will creep at higher boost pressures.

Boost creep is where the wastegate is unable to pass enough exhaust gas to keep boost at its preset level, as a result boost continues to rise uncontrollably. Boost creep will usually occur if one attempts to run the higher boost levels.

For example you may be able to hold 15psi perfectly but upping the boost to 18psi may see boost creep 18, 19, 20psi as revs increase.

Thats my understanding.

My impression was that external gates are better than an internal because you are introducing the wastegate gases separately back into the exhaust (or not for a 'screamer') which is a power adder. Moreover, the 'waste' exhaust gases do not have to enter the turbine housing at all and instead are diverted from the manifold side, also decreasing the backpressure/turbulence in the scroll I believe. And finally, you are getting superior boost control with an appropriately sized gate.

That’s only if it is required...

If you can size the internal gate appropriately then there really is no benefit with the use of an external gate.

Of which Dangerman is soon to find out once he dials in 20 psi.

My guess is he will need to pull the turbo off again and do the usual XR6 wastegate mod. Hopefully not.

Hell its a built motor, let it have 30psi. :D

Can I ask why the spacer is necessary? Could you use this turbo with a standard manifold?

Its my opinion only but a .63 housing on this turbo is too small given its air pumping capacity , if the .82 is too laggy its trying to tell you its too much turbo - or compressor anyway . If smaller trim compressors were available in this turbo it may just work . Another maybe is to use port shrouded compressor covers to avoid the surge issue .

RB30DET's seem to handle the 1.06 ok and even the .82 for a roadie that does not use huge boost pressures . I hear people say that it works ok on RB26's as well though they are probably expected to lift their skirts at 4000+ rpm . I guess a serious track Rb25 with gearing etc to suit could use a .82 version . Gary and others have said that even GT3076R's can be a bit much on a daily driven RB25DET so the GT3540R being larger could be expected to have a higher boost threshold . This is normal when comparing a 500 to a 700Hp capable turbocharger . Power numbers are impossible to quote because the same turbo will give vastly different results on a real race engine compared to the production version it was based on . You can base turbo power potential off the maximum airflow it can efficiently pump (this is usually expressed as pounds per minute) though exhaust flow and turbine efficiency is just as important .

Out of here now , need some sleep (I know how Roy feels) .

Cheers A .

You're always so grey Adrian. Bite the bullet and say it. It's a BIG turbo for an RB25. You would want an at least 8000rpm redline to make use of the power it's making. If the 0.82 housing is too laggy for you then make Dangerman an offer on his old GT30. :D:happy:

Shonen - it's not necessary to high mount it so you don't want it. :sick:

And to whoever asked what that turbo was beside it, I'm guessing that's the GT30 he took off.

I am very interested in seeing how laggy it turns out to be.

Can I ask why the spacer is necessary? Could you use this turbo with a standard manifold?

no... my stainless low mount gives me more room then the standard manifold and i still needed to space

it 25mm.

it is just to big.

1.5 hours on a mill and 25mm spacer is complete.

And to whoever asked what that turbo was beside it, I'm guessing that's the GT30 he took off.

yes its the gt30..

I am very interested in seeing how laggy it turns out to be.

i have noticed going up a hill at 3000rpm in drive its allready making 5psi.

and thats with the boost controller turned off.

once i dial in 20 pound it should improve on that.

Can I ask why the spacer is necessary? Could you use this turbo with a standard manifold?

You're always so grey Adrian. Bite the bullet and say it. It's a BIG turbo for an RB25. You would want an at least 8000rpm redline to make use of the power it's making. If the 0.82 housing is too laggy for you then make Dangerman an offer on his old GT30. :D:happy:

Shonen - it's not necessary to high mount it so you don't want it. :sick:

And to whoever asked what that turbo was beside it, I'm guessing that's the GT30 he took off.

I am very interested in seeing how laggy it turns out to be.

Nah , copper tops get a bit of salt and pepper rounds the hackles but no grey !

Yep , big for street RB25 but some like them that way - not for me to judge .

Don't know about the 8000rpm bit , an RB25 in basic terms is just a more conventional or less competition oriented RB26 with 60 odd less cc's and one turbo . If it pulled up at 4000 that makes a 4000 rpm wide power range assuming you were going to go to 8 .

No GT30's dont have the exhaust flow I'm after and unless the 52 comp trim GT3037 (HKS option only) was used the flow ratios are not good enough in my book . GT3540R is basically a scaled up GT3076R (real GT30R) . I'm not saying they're a bad thing is just I think there may be better (not off the shelf) options for a low boost setup on an RB31DET . The GT35 turbine is quite good though still Garretts older thinking of big or 84 trim . I'm going to hold out for (at this stage) the GT37R turbine which is a tad larger (72.5 vs 68mm) but in 78 trim rather than 84 . The 82mm 50 trim comp would be a doddle for such a turbine to drive so should make for good performance with very little exhaust restriction . I'm hoping to have a scaled up GT28RS or discopotato (that echo again) but for 3L rather than 2L . Bullocks Taters ?

At this stage the turbine housing (GT37R) is huge and heavy but if it was assembled in a TO4Z bearing housing (basically same but clamps to exhaust housing instead of 4 bolt/ear type ie GT4088R) housing options could be TO4 or GT35 type .

Will post some pics of elusive GT37R but OT in this string .

Cheers A .

time for an update. how did it go on the dyno????

im booked in for friday at 11:00am

tomorrow night i will install a 044 intank, so my only limiting factor will be the standard coil packs.

they have only done 47,000 klm's so shouldnt be to bad.

hopefully the pump install goes to plan, and i will put up all my findings friday arvo.

how would the Garrett Gt3540 with the .63 rear go on a rb20det? would it be lagy?

Very much so . Would show up the RB20's lack of torque in essentially low CR form . If Garrett get around to making the GT30 IW exhaust housings in .63AR ratio then the real GT3071R would be a much better thing . HKS's GT2835 Pro S could be Ok but expensive , 3071R a better thing IMO .

As Joel mentioned IW exhaust housings need to be properly designed for high performance petrol applications . HKS's Pro S housings are probably the best for the GT30 turbines but not cheap . Truthfully the combination of compressor and turbine have a large say in potential wastegate problems . Its this holey grail of equal turbine inlet pressure and boost pressure that lets the waste gate regulate properly .

Main problem with RB20's is that they're right on the cusp of GT28 and GT30 turbines flow wise . HKS seemed to nail it with their cropped version of the GT30 turbine but dropped the ball with compressor choise . Had they asked Garrett to make a GT30 turbine based cartridge with a smaller turbine trim ie 76-78 instead of the garden variety 84 trim the GT30 based turbos would be very responsive with small to mid trim 71mm or GT35 series compressors .

I guess the expensive nature of the Pro S series turbos made HKS err towards the larger compressor trims , sort of more bucks for more power potential . I think they expect most RB20 people to be happy with GT28 turbine based turbos and the rest go with 2835's or GT3037's etc . It is possible to bitzer together a good turbo based on Garrett guts and HKS exhaust housing but not cost effective and O/T in this thread .

Cheers A .

Very much so . Would show up the RB20's lack of torque in essentially low CR form . If Garrett get around to making the GT30 IW exhaust housings in .63AR ratio then the real GT3071R would be a much better thing . HKS's GT2835 Pro S could be Ok but expensive , 3071R a better thing IMO .

Is there anything that can be done for the RB20 guys with all the excess 0.63AR exhaust housings from HKS GT2835 ProS? There are a lot of these things around because that's the one that comes with the kit. A lot of people get them for their RB25's and then find out the hard way that the exhuast housing is too small. At great expense they get the 0.87 rear thus 0.63 rears sitting on shelves in quantities.

I'm jumping in this thread for more info.

Still trying to work out what to do with my turbo.

oh, and for those that where talking about dump pipes before. Were you talkingabou something like this

1.jpg

Edited by The Mafia

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day  
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
    • Are you 100% sure this isn't tune related?
    • 140-150 across the board. At this point hoping the grounding harness fixes it. My grounds are all tied to the chassis and none to the battery. For SR and KA that’s never been a problem for me but had a few other guys here and Reddit who told me RB really like a very solid ground setup tied to the battery so going to try that next, I’m stumped if that doesn’t do it. Never had a car have spark and fuel and not fire off before. Only thing I can think is the spark is intermittent/weak because of grounds nothing else really makes sense at this point 
    • I am having close to the same issue. Can you help me with what wire you grounded to get your pump to trigger?
×
×
  • Create New...