Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

obviously lighter cam gears would be better, hey? less rotating mass, and all that. Means less torque, but better revability, ive been told. Thats flywheels, anyway. Does it matter much with cams?

I always thought that lightend flywheels make no difference to power and torque? :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134707-cam-gears/#findComment-2503831
Share on other sites

A lightened drivetrain wil rev more freely, meaning basically that you will speed up quickly. Imagine spinning a light bicycle wheel, campared to spinning a heavy car wheel. The light wheel is easier to get up to speed, but has less momentum, so wont spin for as long, provided the resistance and friction was the same as the heavier car wheel. Hence the lightened flywheel, and carbon driveshafts, lightweight racing wheels etc.

Less weight will give you better acelleration, but you lose torque, because there is less momentum in the engine, and in some cases youll actually perform less ie slowing down when you come to a hill, due to reduced inertia in the rotating mass of your engine. all physics, dude.

I didnt think something so small as a cam gear would matter much though...

Edited by qikstagea
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134707-cam-gears/#findComment-2503844
Share on other sites

A lightened drivetrain wil rev more freely, meaning basically that you will speed up quickly. Imagine spinning a light bicycle wheel, campared to spinning a heavy car wheel. The light wheel is easier to get up to speed, but has less momentum, so wont spin for as long, provided the resistance and friction was the same as the heavier car wheel. Hence the lightened flywheel, and carbon driveshafts, lightweight racing wheels etc.

Less weight will give you better acelleration, but you lose torque, because there is less momentum in the engine, and in some cases youll actually perform less ie slowing down when you come to a hill, due to reduced inertia in the rotating mass of your engine. all physics, dude.

I didnt think something so small as a cam gear would matter much though...

KEWL so seeing as power is the rate at which you do work ie torquexrpm(laymans terms i know multiplying rpm by torque wont give you kw) and adding heavyer stuff to the rotating mass gives me more torque(apparently according to you) howmuch extra torque and power do you think i will get from adding an extra 20kgs to my flywheel??

Did you ever consider the losses involved in getting the rotating mass to turn adding weight to the rotating mass does nothing for the engines output torque or power just makes the enging take longer and more force to wind down which i quess can be considered torque but not the torque we are interested in...i think thats enough torque on talk or was it the other was around.

Edited by otto
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134707-cam-gears/#findComment-2504191
Share on other sites

Also, I don't know the difference but the HKS ones are made of Duralumin and Nickel whereas the Tomei's are 100% Duralumin.

EDIT: just did a quick search and Nickel is actually stronger than Duralumin on the 'Vickers Hardness' test. 638MPa compared with 450MPa respectively.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134707-cam-gears/#findComment-2504372
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
×
×
  • Create New...