Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is the HKS 2835proS a straight fit?

And, if I replace my garrett highflow turbo with one, can I drive 200km to get it tuned?? I can't see any reason why not, if I sit on say 80km/h and take my time I should be OK, but I'd like to know what everyone reckons.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135642-changing-turbos/
Share on other sites

Is the HKS 2835proS a straight fit?

And, if I replace my garrett highflow turbo with one, can I drive 200km to get it tuned?? I can't see any reason why not, if I sit on say 80km/h and take my time I should be OK, but I'd like to know what everyone reckons.

hey

if you buy the 2835 pros kit, its direct bolton comes with everything you need. If you have dump and front pipe that is complete as one, you need need to replaced that as the hks comes with its own dump pipe which bolts up to a front pipe like the factory setup.

also i drove my car untune with 740cc injectors, z32, 2835 pros and pfc for about a week and didnt have any problems if you take it easy and not give it shit you shouldnt cause any problems at all :dry:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135642-changing-turbos/#findComment-2522282
Share on other sites

As michael said, if you get a full rb25 specific kit you can bolt the whole thing up and have it running in under a day easily if you have a separate dump/front pipe already.

If it's only the turbo you will need a new dump pipe, turbo outlet adapter piece to mate up to the stock pipe and an inlet pipe to suit the 4 inch bellmouth. oil/water lines need to be changed too and the studs on the manifold will be too long and need to be swapped over or shortened. I'm fairly certain the oil return pipe flange is a t2 rather than the larger t3 size used on the stock turbo aswell, though the pipe diameter is the same (19mm rings a bell?).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135642-changing-turbos/#findComment-2522831
Share on other sites

I'm only gunning for around 270-280rwkw. But I'd actually rather run a lower boost with a smaller rwkw, say 270rwkw all up.

Presently making 240 on a garrett hiflow [GCG, also its not a std R33 turbo] at 16psi but have since installed tomei 256/8.5 cams so may end up with 250-270 anyway, but at 16psi. Its not excessive, but if I could do it at 12-14psi it would be better on a std motor. But I'm really just thinking about it at the moment. I'll get a lot more serious once I make up my mind, and amass the $$$$.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135642-changing-turbos/#findComment-2523692
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...