Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So the diagnosis usually relies on when the softness occurs. If just sitting for a while and you press the pedal and have softness then on the next press it is hard then you need to see to seals. If the car is approaching 6-7 years old it may be time for all seals to be done if pedal feel is important. If after a long straight on the track it feels soft initially but through areas of multiple corners it stays hard then look at pad knockoff. If all is clean then sometimes on car machining can help.

Sitting a while meaning stopped at the lights?

I get the following (and only sometimes):

Coming to a set of lights, press brake pedal, lack of feel and has alot of travel, release and then press brake pedal again, much much better feel and bite, less travel to hit that biting point.

Is that the same?

That will be a seal problem if you are stationary, if driving for a while it could be knockoff.

Without having a look into the master as well initial soft pedal could be the bypass dimension. In order for the piston to fill with fluid as the pads wear the pressure seal has to bypass the feed tube from the reservior. If it is set to go too far past it will force fluid back into the reservior until it goes past (soft pedal) and then the pedal will firm up, but now we are getting real picky. Every mm it moves though is magnified by the pedal ratio.

This site is alway interesting and does better diagrams than I have time for. http://auto.howstuffworks.com/master-brake1.htm

My breaks feel quite awesome now that I'm running decent pads.

At the very start of the pedal travel it feels light, however with decent pads its very grabby in this area on light breaking, very noticably in car parks etc. After the light pedal travel area the pedal goes hard; its almost like on and off, light then hard; at this point the car is breaking rather hard.

I used to run fairly hard crappy pads that felt dead and made the feel pedal hard with no grab that made the car feel as if it was difficult to pull up; I had to really stomp on the brakes to lock the wheels.

Now that I'm running Ferodo pads I find myself easily over braking; I just can't seem to get used to how touchy the brakes are, especially as mentioned above in car parks.

I have yet to drive a new car that has a better pedal feel than my old R32. The closest pedal feel to mine is the 100series V8 Landcruiser. Interestingly the pedal travel feel is similiar, its got a light grabby area at the top that then goes harder, the exception is with the r32 the hard area is harder but it also has a hell of a lot more grab.

So my advice; try different pads, pads make a huge difference to pedal feel. EDIT: You already have. :P

Only a street pad... GP2 I believe they were.

They have slightly better grab than the Ultimates I used to run but unfortunately they throw out just as much dust. Unsure how they cope with high speed and lots of cornering as I don't really go that hard; a brisk drive through the hills they are perfectly fine with no signs of fade, thats all that matters.

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

finally got my car to the brake shop. Had the discs machined at the local tyre shop to fix the soft pedal feel. But after they had done them i started to get a wobble in the front end. So i went to a proper brake place only to discover that the tyre shop had only machined one side of the disc. The back side was almost new and the front was just about down to the wear limit and they had also machined a wobble in them. So now i'm up for 2 new front rotors. So I'm getting slotted ones and red stuff pads in the front aswell. They're going to give it a full look over at the same time. Hopefully this will fix the soft pedal feel. Will post the results

  • 2 months later...
  • 4 months later...

Hi guys,

What prices have you paid for new rubber and braided lines? I was thinking of taking mine off and having Pirtek put new rubber onto the stock end pieces. Don't know what this would cost either.

ive just put braied hoses on and ive got a softer pedal than i did before. getting new rotors and a caliper kit and see what happens. ive never had a problem with braking but the pedal has always been soft.

old car, also a car that has been driven hard will have softer seals,hoses,and just generaly abit worn in all the hydrolics. also using a "performace" brake fluid also softens the seals making the pedal soft aswell.

unfortonatly there isnt much to do about it. sometimes its air stuck in the abs unit. and sometimes its just a case of soft seals. new pads feel soft untill fully bedded too. using a bigger master cylinder is a option. but you have to swap over the proportoning valve in the origonal cylinder or you will crack rear disks and or overheat the fronts.

oh and pad knock off from wheel bearings is pretty common. especaly if you have bigger disks fitted.

  • 3 months later...

my R33 GTST type M has awesome brakes most of the time no mushyness at all, until about a month ago! i put my foot on the brake pedal and got nothing but floorboards.. that was interesting, i was approching the back of a car parked at a red light rappidly, luckily it pulled up ok... i hadn't been driving it hard at all, there was no reason to assume the fluid had boiled, so i had decided it was the master cylinder, until the problem went away the following day, then reappeared the following week and dissappeared yet again until this morning when i found myself going slower and slower even as i accelerated more and more, the front brake calipers have locked on, i now have bright blue rotors and they have magically released... so i will be rebuilding the master cylinder and calipers and bleeding it would seem...

any one else had calipers lock on like that?

ok so on the subject of rubber vs braided lines it seems the only real benefit to braided is that they last longer?

Not realy, as explained earlier a rubber line will over time expand with the pressure of the braking fluid the braided lines fix this problem. But unless you do lots of mountain drives or track work, you probably won't notice much if any difference.

Saying that they are better and I have them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...