Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My R32 drifter project has started.. :(

0004874zt2.jpg

0004876tm2.jpg

spa0503rh2.jpg

spa0505ee2.jpg

Here is my RB25DE that we picked up yesterday.. it ended up being out of a r33 not a r32 like we thought..

1000134vl0.jpg

Bridgestone Potenza front coil overs and springs.. & JIC rears...

1000136cd6.jpg

New upper and lower nismo control arms..

1000141pl0.jpg

Coilovers & upper control arms intalled..

1000144nb4.jpg

Lower control arms installed..

I will keep this thread up to date with he conversion.

:laugh: I'm SO excited!!!

Edited by RB_turbo_bitch
  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

so your going to turbo the NA motor?

Yes that's right!

hmmm 33 na 25 is going to make things a little harder yes?

Yes correct... i was actually wanting to get the non vvt rb25 but this is the one we ended up with...

I didn't even know Bridgestone made coilovers

Are you going to leave the motor as a high comp. NA when you turbo it?

I didn't know they made them either!

We are putting a 2.4mm head gasket to lower the compresion down quite a bit.

hey matey

im doing exactly the same conversion...

right now actually.

i've got my 25DE sump at the engineers getting the 20DET oil drain welded into it.

Other than that, im gonna rock the 10:1 CR and the 260 cc injectors with the stock RB20 ECU, stock turbo and manifold and im gonna use a 1980's apex AFC to richen things up a bit.

by they way, im gonna be running natural boost and aiming for around 160 kw at the wheels

hey matey

im doing exactly the same conversion...

right now actually.

i've got my 25DE sump at the engineers getting the 20DET oil drain welded into it.

Other than that, im gonna rock the 10:1 CR and the 260 cc injectors with the stock RB20 ECU, stock turbo and manifold and im gonna use a 1980's apex AFC to richen things up a bit.

by they way, im gonna be running natural boost and aiming for around 160 kw at the wheels

That sounds interesting andy! Can i ask why you aren't using a thicker head gasket to lower the compression? I was told that is the first mistake most people make when doing this conversion.

I have a Blitz access computer going on mine and some GTR injectors..

I am using the RB20 manifold and bits of my old engine..

and an RB25 Neo turbo (for now that is) :happy:

Edited by RB_turbo_bitch

andy,

ermm... whats natural boost? :happy:

You mean standard boost, i.e no aftermarket boost control apart from the std actuator?

and yes lowering the compression via the thick headgasket works but it does increase fuel consumption and makes the motor detonate easier.

With regards to the rocker covers thing.. My R32 RB25DE (nonvct) looks identical to my RB20DET. The only way you can tell it apart is by looking at the size of the valves, combustion chamber and ports. So once its bolted on you can't tell the difference between the rb20 and rb25.

hey matey

im doing exactly the same conversion...

right now actually.

i've got my 25DE sump at the engineers getting the 20DET oil drain welded into it.

Other than that, im gonna rock the 10:1 CR and the 260 cc injectors with the stock RB20 ECU, stock turbo and manifold and im gonna use a 1980's apex AFC to richen things up a bit.

by they way, im gonna be running natural boost and aiming for around 160 kw at the wheels

so are you using the stock rb20, or rb25 turbo? if its the rb20 i think you would be better off with the 25 turbo, as it isn't going to be as close to maxing out... unless you don't plan reving over 5000rpm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Consider a 35 too...
    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 😃
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
×
×
  • Create New...