Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by EVOIV

INASNT: What car do you have? Guessing a Skyline R33? I think a 0.87 housing would be perfect for the RB25...not too laggy, and a heap of top end power.

yep RB25.

Guy with SR20 wants to get the 1.12 turbine housing and this is on a circuit car he is building!!!

  • Replies 283
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmm...a 1.12 housing is going to be crazy lag :D I would rather go for the larger T51 HKS turbo instead of the GT3037S with 1.12A/R. I think it looks nicer ;) He using a stroker kit? 2.2L? Well, there is the white JUN s15 in Perth that's supposed to be a circuit car. And that runs a T88. Too big if you ask me :D

RS500 thanks for the link to the comparison chart. I see what you are saying about the turbine housing. Only confused now that once the wastegate opens, wouldnt back pressure be about the same at 1 bar of boost wether o.87 or 0.61???

I think HKS recommend the 0.87 turbine housing for RB25, but I will wait and see what this turbo goes like when I start winding boost in before I trade in the housing for a larger one. If I can keep a similar torque curve, its staying. Very nice to have good power available from low down, and it is definately more responsive and pulls alot harder off boost than with the stock turbo.

Paul, if the car is on the road, not getting work done, there is every chance in the world.

  • 2 months later...

question here guys. When I brought my car they told me it had a hks 2530 on it. When I pulled some of the plumbing off recently and got a better look at the turbo the only clues I got to it being aftermarket was the smooth feel of the ball bearing blades, and a small badge near the (oil?) feed line which said gt2530. Now is this turbo a garret? by the sounds of it it wont make alot of difference, garret seem to know their stuff...

HKS use garrett cores, the HKS 2530 is infact a HKS GT2530, and it should have a plate saying GT2530 on the core.

But, it should also have HKS on the compressor cover and turbine cover, as they have them specially made to their specs, as are the compressor wheels. This is what you pay the extra for.

The core though is identical.

  • 1 month later...
It will be interesting to see how the GT30 you are fitting goes in comparsion - hurry up:D

.

If your curious to know, my previous turbo was a gt30 (the previous owner told me it was a gt35/40). It had a .82 rear housing (it was a 500hp turbo). on 26psi it made 320+rwkw. It had full boost @ 4000rpm (320rwkw). It started spooling up @ approx 3000rpm. It held 300rwkw to 6500k then dropped off to 290rwkw @ 7300rpm.

My t88 makes full boost abit later but makes the same power using much lesser boost + timing and holds it all the way to 7400rpm.

H.

If your curious to know, my previous turbo was a gt30 (the previous owner told me it was a gt35/40). It had a .82 rear housing (it was a 500hp turbo). on 26psi it made 320+rwkw. It had full boost @ 4000rpm (320rwkw). It started spooling up @ approx 3000rpm. It held 300rwkw to 6500k then dropped off to 290rwkw @ 7300rpm.

My t88 makes full boost abit later but makes the same power using much lesser boost + timing and holds it all the way to 7400rpm.

H.

Thats funny coz i remember gtst-vspec thread and he was making 300rwkw with on 18psi with a 500hp GT30.

What size was the comp on your gt30?

HKS use garrett cores, the HKS 2530 is infact a HKS GT2530, and it should have a plate saying GT2530 on the core.

But, it should also have HKS on the compressor cover and turbine cover, as they have them specially made to their specs, as are the compressor wheels.  This is what you pay the extra for.

The core though is identical.

Steve, i have a hks 2540 and it only has hks on the exaust housing. not on the actuator, nor the compressor housing. can you prove that it is not a hks turbo because i really doubt it as is was sold to me by a very reliable contact. please be sure of your statements as the amount of bullshit on this board must be approaching the 50% level...

night, mic

Steve, i have a hks 2540 and it only has hks on the exaust housing. not on the actuator, nor the compressor housing. can you prove that it is not a hks turbo because i really doubt it as is was sold to me by a very reliable contact. please be sure of your statements as the amount of bullshit on this board must be approaching the 50% level...

night, mic

spot reserved for ownage... I'm eating, will post my reply in a few mins

Steve, i have a hks 2540 and it only has hks on the exaust housing. not on the actuator, nor the compressor housing. can you prove that it is not a hks turbo because i really doubt it as is was sold to me by a very reliable contact. please be sure of your statements as the amount of bullshit on this board must be approaching the 50% level...

night, mic

There really was no need for that last comment, all you manged to do is make yourself look like a dickhead.

Anyway.... So you want proof? You really want proof that you got ripped off and your "very reliable contact" sold you an incomplete HKS turbo or worse, a Garrett turbo with HKS exhaust housing?

How about this... I scanned in a page of my HKS Goodsmaster.

Firstly, the page:

2540_a.jpg

And a zoom of the turbo pictured:

2540_b.jpg

Notice the big and unmistakable "HKS" cast onto the compressor housing?

Notice the caption that labels it a GT2540?

HKS GT2540s don't come with HKS wastegate actuators. You have to buy them seperately, so I scanned in that page too:

actuator_a.jpg

actuator_b.jpg

It is possible to use your standard actuators with the HKS turbo, but not very commonly done.

So.... Is that proof enough for you?

Now what's this about the bullshit level of posts on here??? Perhaps what YOU think is bullshit, is actually correct, and the bullshit lies solely with you.

26GTS, ask yourself, how do you know you have a HKS turbo if it doesnt have HKS on it?

All the HKS turbos I have seen (admittedly not hundreds, but I have seen many) have, as Merli demonstrated (cant get much clearer than that;) cheers), HKS on the housings.

Perhaps if you really do think 50% of the info on here is bullshit, you shouldnt bother logging on, as you would be doing yourself a disservice.

Admittedly there is some dis-information, but I have certainly learnt alot from here, as I would think most people who have been loggin on for a while have.

Perhaps you could word your posts a little better, rather than just jumping in and making broad sweeping and unfair generalisations - makes for much friendlier forums:)

Uh guys, you might have noticed he has an RB20 or 25 powered car. Odds are on the fact he is using a single turbo setup, which probably has a T3 flange. All of the HKS 25xx series with the T3 flange DO NOT have the custom HKS compressor cover, but use a Garrett cover with the center machined out and an aluminium insert held in by 4 hex screws.

The only HKS markings on the T3 range are on the exhaust cover, and on the metal tag on the center catridge.

Standard actuators work fine with those turbos too, so no dire need to run a HKS actuator.

Just my 2 cents, no need to jump on the bandwagon and drill someone over this...

Hi guys I've got a RB25det (auto) and I want to make around the 200rwkw mark I was first looking at a HKS2530 to do this but like the idea of cheaper price (new) turbo and running less boost to hit that target power.

So what would be a good Garrett turbo to hit my goal?

I already have:

Wolf ECU (not in-stalled)

910 Fuel pump (not in-stalled)

Filter

Comeing soon:

Turbo back exhaust (Depending on Turbo)

FMIC (Depending on Turbo)

Auto Tranny cooler

Fuel Reg

Injectors

I'm not after a dyno queen I just want useable power and it must spool up quick, I'm after torque.

Useing standard internals I'm looking at running two different settings with the Wolf Low boost around the 170-180rwkw and high boost 200-210rwkw.

I was looking at this one do you think this will be ok or do you think it might be to big for what I'm after?

Garrett GT25R Ball Bearing Turbo:-

Rated 380hp

Spec's:-

0.64a/r Turbine Housing (5 bolt outlet)

0.70a/r Compressor Housing

Watercooler Centre

48 Trim Compressor Wheel (T04S)

48 lbs/min Comp Flow Max.

76 Trim Turbine Wheel

Integral Wastegate

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...