Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I want to know by changing a bigger FMIC but with the same set up, is that going to have any power increase on the dyno? I've heard people say no, unless you adjust the boost or further tune, but on the other hard, I've also read a Zoom magazine before, that car changed from a front mount standard Supra's intercooler (the big one) to a bigger FMIC, and it had 30rwkw increase by doing that, so I've no idea what to believe. :happy:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/142056-intercooler-power/
Share on other sites

it really depends on the cooler.

if it has a better flow rate, and a better cooling efficiency then you will gain power, but lose a little bit of throttle response.

if it flows more air, then you will gain power. if the temp of the air going into the motor is cooler, you will gain power. its as simple as that.

people will go on about how you don't gain power since you lose repsonse, but that is a load of crud. all that means is from the moment you put your foot down to the moment you go "vroom" may be a split second longer. once the air has filled up the space, whatever cooler flows better/cools better will give you more power.

you do lose throttle response. imagine the piping being like a hose. the shorter the hose, the sooner the water comes out the end.

and you don't get accleleration lag from a bigger cooler. you get response lag, but not acceleration lag. once the turbo is up to speed the air will be flowing at the same speed as normal, so the air going into the motor will be the same. this means it will create the same power. if it creates the same power, it will accelerate the same.

now you can post up drag times that fit your story if you leave out every other variable other than the size of the cooler. but the simple fact is that if a cooler flows the same amount of air as another cooler, other than the initial response, acceleration won't change.

if you have 2 identical cars with 2 identical power graphs, with 1 just having a bigger cooler than the other, their acceleration times will be extremely similar. the only difference will be in initial acceleration since there is more lag on the bigger cooler. once going they will accelerate at the same speed. if you don't believe this then go and study physics.

By changing to a larger fmic you can gain a little power on a dyno due to the way an intercooler works, it cools the intake charge thereby making the inlet charge more dense and containing more oxygen by volume. useually the power will increase because most systems are tuned RICH as a precaution so with the added oxygen you get a better burn in the cylinder. You wont always get more lag with a larger cooler either as it depends on the design of cooler wether it is a BAR & PLATE or TUBE & FIN. factory coolers are usually tube and fin design so charging to a larger bar and plate cooler can often reduce lag. It also depends on the length of the cooler piping and the diametre, keep the pipes as short as possible, usually 2.5in to the cooler (for average & mid size turbos) and then 3in from cooler to manifold as the denser air from the outlet of the cooler needs a larger diametre pipe to keep the air speed up, hope this helps.

What is in your Setup

larger the intercooler the Cooler your air temps are gonna be.With cooler air temps the More Timing you can run.MORE TIMING = More Power + Torque

As for lag

JUST REVVVVVVVVVV n DUMP

no lag there

Mate ive got a 600x300x128 mm cooler on my car and it does have a lil longer lag then usually but when u dump it or rev it honestly doesnt matter

But as for a intercooler on its own increasing power

Wont happen You need to tune it more to notice any power gain

UNLESS your car is Pinging due to increased Timing then you will see an increase in power

it really depends on the cooler.

if it has a better flow rate, and a better cooling efficiency then you will gain power, but lose a little bit of throttle response.

if it flows more air, then you will gain power. if the temp of the air going into the motor is cooler, you will gain power. its as simple as that.

people will go on about how you don't gain power since you lose repsonse, but that is a load of crud. all that means is from the moment you put your foot down to the moment you go "vroom" may be a split second longer. once the air has filled up the space, whatever cooler flows better/cools better will give you more power.

There's been a few R33's making near 200rwkw on a stock IC.

Rev210.. Didn't you manage a high 12 on the stock IC some years back?

The only benefit of an FMIC I see is CONSISTENT power.. At near stock boost levels and stock turbo the stock ic will make the same power on the dyno, on the street after its little ic has heat soaked its going to be down on power.

I don't believe the stock ic is a massive restriction to airflow when running the stock turbo, it does however have a massive restriction in regards to its heat sink ability. This is its downfall.

I run a sperco bar/plate IC thats rated to flow 580hp worth of air with a 1.5psi pressure drop.

Running 12psi I picked up 3rwkw.

On the road.. First didn't feel as if it boosted as early and the hit didn't snap as hard. Second was the same however it felt as if third and fourth pulled a little harder.

Prior to fitting the fmic I cruised, pulled over strapped it to 4th gear pulled over felt the stock ic and it was cooking. So a simple quick strap was enough to have it heatsoak.

The FMIC.. 3/4 of the fmic is cool the first 1/4 goes from hot to cool.

As for lag

JUST REVVVVVVVVVV n DUMP

no lag there

lol bah to rev n dump... Drop a rb30 in it and pull ~700odd maybe a touch more off that turbo spool threshold. :)

Drop a GT30r .82 on the rb30det and have it spooling the same as a stock rb25det. :P

im with cubes

i reckon if i dynoed my car with

stock fmic

china poor mans core fmic

arc fmic

i reckon they would all make the same power

the better ones would come out on top for battling heat soak and taking away some throttle lag perhaps, but all would make the same power

This is what I think. With a FMIC, you will notice very little gain on the dyno as there is not much air flow to cool the charged air from the turbo. But on driving on the road is different story. You will feel the difference but you cannot measure the power unless you have got some sort of instrument to measure power on board. I feel the difference when I change to FMIC even on stock boost. Pulls harder as the charged air is cooler so more dense.

This is what I think. With a FMIC, you will notice very little gain on the dyno as there is not much air flow to cool the charged air from the turbo. But on driving on the road is different story. You will feel the difference but you cannot measure the power unless you have got some sort of instrument to measure power on board. I feel the difference when I change to FMIC even on stock boost. Pulls harder as the charged air is cooler so more dense.

just get dyno'd in a wind tunnel

and remember that an intercooler core with no air ducting around is going to have less air go through it than one that has proper air ducting forcing the air through. check out the radiator setup on a v8 supercar

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...