Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If there are two cars, one running 15 psi, and the other running 20psi. You would expect the car running the higher boost to create more torque.

But, whilst they are still spooling and ramping up to their set boost level, would you expect the car running more boost to make more power even though its yet to physically run any higher boost then the other car?

I suspect wastegate creep could account for more mid of the car running higher boost, as it is less likely to crack as early?

Anyone with any real experience or dyno print outs showing an increase in mid range from one run to the other, only thing beign changed being boost?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/142846-silly-boost-question/
Share on other sites

If the ext gate is correctly setup.

It wont crack before it should.

15psi or 20psi, the gate should only open once the boost has reached that level. If there is creep, then the spring is too soft and so on.

Im not too sure thats true Ash, could be, but the physics doesnt suggets it.

Anyway, its not really the question. If on your old setup, if you ran 16psi, then 22psi, did you find your torque curve was fatter even when the thing was ramping onto boost through the 5-15psi range?

Why dont they? Would love to know how its different.

I went from a 7psi spring/17psi, and you could clearly see it was creeping, you could hear it cracking open aswell ever so slightly before target boost was reached

Soon as we went to 14psi spring/17psi, you could see it on the dyno fully loaded it wouldnt open till it hit the 17.

Getting a spring as close/spot on to the gate it shouldnt let it open before.

How can it? Should the spring not hold. It is related, you brought it up ;)

I can say i ever checked the 5-15 range to be honest.

Nor did i ask about it. I cant say i noticed a difference before hand, it was only after it was on boost as the thing really wokeup using 24psi as opposed to 17psi.

Felt a lot more lively without even using the extra timing and so on.

Has anyone got dyno sheets of their engine showing torque cruve at different boost levels?

Forget wastegates...i hear what you are saying ...but take a car and run it at 15psi. The run it again at 22psi.

Would you expect their to be a difference in torque range while they are ramping up to 15psi? Sure when you do the 2nd run up to 22psi it will make more power, but will the curve be moved to the left at all?

I wouldnt expect it to, but im a bit confused by some results i saw the other night if a few cars on the dyno. Two same engins, but different turbos. Both makign boost at the same rpm , the boost curves look the same. Only the car running higher boost is making more power earlier. Ok so they run different turbos so thats to be expected. Only the car running higher boost is makign a lot more torque a few humdred rpm earlier????

Sounds like different setups... even though the motor is the same, a cam, timing, air intake temp, spark, fuel.. they should all make torque differences.

I'd imagine, as Nismoid suggests, that if I dyno'd my car at 7, and then at 10, the curve should be exactly the same up until the boost goes over 7, at which point the first run would have the wastegate open and stop the car from really making any more boost. 2nd run at 10psi would see more boost, and the actuator open later, as more pressure is built up.

The leadup to the wastegate opening shouldn't be any different. The ECU/car doesn't know when the boost is going to be dumped out the wastegate, so nothing else should change before that happens.

Still.. that's what i'd assume from theory, and i'm keen to see any results! (obviously same car, same day, same setup would be the only fair test)

EDIT: hmm... so... if that was confirmed, then possibly the wastegate actuator spring could be a culprit? A guy running more boost may have put in a harder spring, to better match the desired boost pressure, and therefore it holds boost better. Another bloke runs his standard setup on higher boost, and perhaps some of the pressure is lost through the wastegate because it's not holding as well as a stiffer spring. That's the only thing that I can think of that might explain it.

Edited by RANDY

if it is the same car with the same turbo and you change the boost from 15psi to 20psi (using a wastegate set at those 2 pressures) then there will be no power difference untill the boost goes above 15psi when you have the boost wound up. from the moment the second setup goes above 15psi the power and torque will change. below that the will be 100% the same.

if it is 2 different turbos then it comes down the compressor properties.

Only the car running higher boost is making more power earlier. Ok so they run different turbos so thats to be expected. Only the car running higher boost is makign a lot more torque a few humdred rpm earlier????

I'm not sure what the issue is, more power eariler..then why are u suprised it makes more torque earlier considering they related.

no 2 setup are 100% the same, don’t forget. engine condition, heat, wear exhaust ect etc, everything matters. Even 2 identical cars 1 may be something slightly diffrent causing different outcomes.

As said

"if it is the same car with the same turbo and you change the boost from 15psi to 20psi (using a wastegates set at those 2 pressures) then there will be no power difference until the boost goes above 15psi when you have the boost wound up. from the moment the second setup goes above 15psi the power and torque will change. below that the will be 100% the same. if it is 2 different turbos then it comes down the compressor properties."

is all there is to it, and don’t forget dynos aren’t 100% accurate and are effected my environmental conditions. Just like cars are with heatsoak

..a dirty air filter can be a factor .. if you get what im saying.

Yeh, i appreciate ppl saying they are different engines...but what im sayign is FATGTS-R (from memory) made a lot more mid range and torque when he ran a higher boost level then when he ran lower boost.

Driving my car at the moment on 21psi, im nowhere near hitting or hearing the gate and its driving with more midrange. The comparisonbs between two different motors are pretty inconclusive, you are right. But it just seems that these two particular expamples of RB20s when running pretty high boost...well it seems to wake up the mid range???

Then again if FATGTS-R reads this, he may be able to comment on whether i understand correctly an old post of his

i cant see any logical reason why car 1 running 10psi and car 2 running 15 psi would make more torque earlier in the rev range. its just manifold pressure, forcing more air into the engine. i see no reason why it would force it to make more torque ealier (if thats what you are expecting). once car 2 reaches the more boost pressure then sure, more torque is possible.

thats assuming car 2's compressor wheel is still in its efficency island as well

Its a shame ive got a 1 bar spring in the wastegate as im getting a tune done in the morning. If i had a 7 psi spring i could get two different boost printouts done, and no im not gonna put 20psi into a na motor, well not yet anyway lol.

In theory i dont think it should make any more torque untill it sees more boost but i do think by seat of the pants feeling they do pull harder down low for some reason on higher boost

just my experience to add, no answers here.

my car seems to feel like it has more torque when im running higher boost.

ie: having my controller set to 1.36bar as opposed to 1.05 bar, then whilst general street driving and not winding it out, it seems to pull harder even though im not hitting its max setting

(hitting around 0.7 - 1.0 bar thru the gear changes for example)

i'd be interested to know if this is caused by a fault like the wastegate actuator, as suggested, cos my turbo is in for a rebuild at the moment.

Edited by iz32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...