Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok, so say for EG, i want response of a stock turbo, and dont need huge power. What would u suggest to get my engine to rev faster?

say rather than anything else.

Goal : to make engine rev like a fkn ferrari, fast response, response + rev

budget : $15000.

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Manual R34 is 4.111, auto is 4.083.

Diff centres are interchangeable so if R33 GTST diffs really are 4.3 then that would work. Highway fuel economy will suck the higher you go though, actually economy generally.

R33 manual diff ratio is also 4.111 & more than short enough. If you make the engine more responsive from the bottom end, you will definantely not want shorter gearing than a 33 already has. 1st gear is only good for 60 & second for 100 & cruising at 100 in fifth still has it reving at over 3 grand. I've always thought if I can't find a six speed to suit my 33 I'll be trying for a taller diff as first is just so short that the stock engine can't spin up fast enough & it revs too high when cruising. If you shortened the gearing that would only make it worse, not to mention fuel economy also goind down the drain.

You would also loose time in having to do more shifts to get to the same speed, not worth it IMO.

Do all the other engine mods & it'll pull like a train in any gear anyway.

Edited by JazzaR33

Real life Initial D kinda stuff like all the cool kids in sports cars in Japan do that you see on those dvds.

Dangerous but fun. Would give a really good adrenalin rush, I know i got one last time i did a hardcore attempt at Mt Nebo.

Edited by r33_racer

a high-flow turbo is just going to increase lag.. i would think that although you are chasing peak power, if its low-down torque you want then is this really the best option?

obviously things like lighten the car, and increase power are going to help, but if you are chasing specific things that are going to relate to low-down torque, maybe consider

- cam gears

- lightened flywheel + pulleys

- remove clutch fan and replace with thermo fan(s)

- responsive turbo

- aftermarket ECU: plenty of low-down timing and good AFRs

- if you are planning on running low boost, maybe consider stock intercooler for reduced piping? or a small FMIC rather than a huge core?

i don't know, just some ideas...

its obvious to say "just put on an exhaust and wind up the boost" but we already know that will make more power. let's help him get his low down torque.. i know personally (having an rb20) how a lack of low-down torque can kill the fun!

yeah - rb20 definitely needs lowdown revs.. especially in an auto, you're waiting forever. That's why they put the 4.3 diff in it

speaking from experience with my current setup, rb25, with an rb20 box that has (I am pretty sure) shorter gearing than a standard rb25 box, short diff (4.3 - auto one), air con belt disconnected, and lightened flywheel make a fair difference. Mine revs like tits on a bull at the moment, and i haven't really done too much to it, it just happened that way - but there is the down sides as people have covered...

* it sits on 3000rpm at 110km/hr, allowing possibly a max speed of only 200km/hr. This is great for drag strip.. but not good for where you may need to have more than this speed (some race tracks)

* you get the 'rex buzz box' feel, where you're always changing gears and it's noisey as a mofo. It's fun in traffic, and makes the car feel faster than it is... but ultimately probably robbing usable power.

* the car can squirm like a bitch from 0-100.. even on near stock power levels like mine. You'll need good tyres and get the power to the ground. I know if I increase the power to the wheels too much, I'm going to have to go back to a more normal ratio.

Diff ratio change is probably the easiest one thing to give you what you want, and that is acceleration maybe than revs(?).. hell throw in an rb20 box and give me your rb25 one :D but be warned.

As alot of people have said, get rid of weight. Thats the thing that outright kills acceleration the most, you've already gotten rid of most of the interior so now work on the engine bits like lightened flywheel and pulleys, removing AC etc. If you're after response and purely response it might be wise to keep the stock SMIC position so upgrade to an R34 GTT unit or try find an aftermarket ARC or something of the same design.

And pretty much what else has listed and go for something like a GT2530.

if you want the engine to rev 'faster', you need to reduce reciprocating mass, as you already seem to know. if you plan on rebuilding, lighter pistons and rods will help in that department, and an increase in compression as already mentioned too will go well for your power goals.

everything else has been mentioned

But... not trying to rain on anyones parade...but are you seriously going to rebuild a motor with lighter pistons, rods etc. Better cams etc all for 220rwkws??? Thats crazy! The std motor with a 2530 will make the thing as responsive as hell, throw somehting like a HKS Type S cooler on it with a good exhaust and tune and it will have so much response and torque it will be forever lighting up the tyres...unless you run a semi slick

...throw a carbon driveshaft at a car? Again all so you can just go out and drive like a nutter on a public strip of road??? Thats a lot of money, come time and your clutch is dead then sure throw a better flywheel in there, perhaps remove the clutch fan and install an electric thermo fan...but the turbo size and tune will make the thing way responsive.

Sorry, some of the suggestions being made make no sense to me. Even if you had lots of money to spend, i cant see the point of internal engine mods and gutting an R34 GTT. Get a Pfc and get it tuned, if R34s are like R33s then get an exhaust cam gear...and spend the money on good tyres and suspension.

Dont strip the interior or anything like that. Its a road car and you are planning on racing it on the road????? So a cage could be a great idea. If this is what you really want to do then i would buy a little S13 or something. That way you are not defiling a big dollar car, or on the flip side you are not going to write off or have confiscated your 35k R34.

Roy does have a point, its going to be alot of money spent for just a few minutes on a public road.

I recommend selling the and getting an S2000 or Type R. :no: Might not rev as quick as you'd like but theres no lag and it'd handle the twisties alot easier.

Just thought I'd throw this out there, I'm not saying this is a definite solution at all (so be nice :P ).. is there a slightly smaller turbo you could put on that would spool up quicker and suit this application? if he's not after huge power and just quick revs (possibly not huge speeds) then is this a possibility or is it just stupid and it'll run out of puff too soon?

the path to money spending is faster for some and slower for others. $15k for instance is chicken feed for owning a modified car.

If you spend $2,100 on a carbon fibre tailshaft ( I can put you in contact with the organisation that does them delivered for about that) , consider that some multiplate clutches can cost more. You want a nice set of forged rims as well? Thats going to cost you more by a factor of at least 2 and not give you the same sorts of benifits in the same sort of magnitude. Although it helps with suspension and brake associated areas as well and is worth doing too.

Also consider that the improvements to overall drive feel (thanks to reduced harmonics), accelleration and reduced wear on gearbox and diff all come without any penalty in on-going running, including accellerated engine (and everything else) wear costs, like more power does.

Why only 220rwkw? Why not?

The cars bits and peices will last longer at that level than More than 220rwkw means more attention and cost to get the power to the ground and make the car generally more reliable.

I am quite confident that if someone builds a car around a target 220rwkw and invests dollars in maximising engine response and the other important areas of braking and suspension etc, they can have a car that will be very nice to drive around town (with full interior) and make other peoples cars who are focused on power, look rather slow around a track.

This guy is on the right track, he needs a little more info about what he really wants to do and it's going to be a very good car he ends up with.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...