Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have 4000's at the moment, I want the 5000's to try to get rid of the heat better.... I'm just copying chris's setup since his seems to work... And the Pads i ended up having to use sorry :woot: - i emailed you a couple of weeks ago telling you? The DS3000's chewed the crap outta my rotors daily driving, so have to use 2500 for daily now....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143976-dba-rotors/#findComment-2686977
Share on other sites

UAS, his mark ups on the DBA stuff is pretty damn low. I was shocked how much i got my new rotors for recently

yeah john gave me a good price on some other stuff i was looking at, so i think he may be the go... i'll email him tomorrow.

dezz: thanks mate, yeah i saw those GB's, but i think their stuff is equiv to the dba4000 stuff, not the 2 peice 5000's....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143976-dba-rotors/#findComment-2687987
Share on other sites

I found repco to be the cheapest when I just bought some slotted DBA 4000's. I just rang around everywhere and I was working in Hamilton and the repco there had the best price. beat some quotes by about $160. $376 compared to $540 or something. (just for front 2.)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143976-dba-rotors/#findComment-2689208
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...