Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hypothesis: If there was a system on ur vehicle to cool the temperature of the fuel down prior to reeaching the injectors would it give the vehicle;

i) more fuel economy?

ii) more performance?

iii) What are the disadvantages?

iv) has anyone tried it ?

I dont need a 100 ideas and ways to cool the fuel down I am after some raw facts of the concept.

What do u guys think?

i thought most studies on fuel atomization vs temperature show low fuel temps = not so good. perhaps this is the use of the fuel temp sender on 300zx and/or GTR's, in order to richen injector pulsewidth when the fuel is too cold

thus if low fuel temps arent good:

1) no

2) no

3) 1 and 2

4) unlikely due to 1 and 2

When the fuel is cooler, it is denser, so more fuel molecules in the same volume. Therefore the engine should run richer, which is not overly desirable for making power.

When the fuel is cooler, it is denser, so more fuel molecules in the same volume. Therefore the engine should run richer, which is not overly desirable for making power.

But couldn't you increase timing or lean it out through the tune?

Also, to cool fuel down, ceramic coat the fuel rail, heat wrap the fuel lines?

only beneficial when the engine is under extreme levels of thermal loading for extended periods, too keep pre-ignition under control.

Alan Horsley did this on the RX-7 endurance racers in the 90's (kept fuel in storage tanks in a cool room for chilling before use)

I remember hearing about one of the Porsches Jim Richards used in targa a few years back using the Air Con system to cool the fuel, in an interview he said they race with the A/C on to produce MORE power.

might be worth looking into.....

lol! more power than what you lose by running the A/C compressor? =-o

In any case, I always thought a hotter fuel is easier to combust. I think the R33's have water lines running towards the plenum somewhere to heat the fuel up.. mainly for cold days. That's just what I read somewhere.

Hot motor + cold air = power.

Back in the day...

They used to cool the fuel when F1 was racing under the stupid fuel volume constraints in the mid eighties. It gave them a little extra capacity.

Basically as long as the fuel in the rail is sufficiently cool not to vaporise in your system you don't have a problem. The small difference in density for a change in temps of, say 10 degrees will not make your AFR change in any noticeable way. So it is a waste of time.

Keeping excess heat out of the system can come in handy, however. Note though, that there is a larger volume of fuel charging around the system (& returning to the tank) than goes to the motor. So don't worry overly about it.

Lastly, in the DR30 Skylines that Freddie Gibson campaigned they used to use the fuel to cool the ECU. :P

I am running a fuel cooler on my car, and it does make a difference particularly if you have a highly worked engine. For australian conditions you dont need the coolant lines running through the inlet manifold, its australia, not japan.

cold air is denser and holds more fuel, if fuel is atomising well then theres probably no need to cool the actual fuel. I don't think cooling the fuel is going to help unless you are noticing fuel problems due to heat.

Brings back memories of cars not starting/being hard to start on hot days because the fuel was vaporising in the carby before it went into the engine e.g. heat soak in engine over heating the fuel in fuel bowl in carby but I don't really think it applies to injected engines. For a start the electric fuel pump will supply the right pressure regardless whereas a mechanical fuel pump needs the engine to be turning to get the fuel pressure up, and the fuel is mostly sucked into the engine.

I do know back about 50 yearas they used to make a metal gasket that went on the head between the intake and exhaust (same Side back then) with some bars going ascross the air and exhaust flow to transfer heat into the already fueled airflow that gave 20% more mileage. Not dsure about power though, it was for economy.

Your fuel will already be kept cool due the to valves in your fuel pump, when fuel is pressurised it in turn keeps cool. If your really keen you can take the fuel inlet off you injector rail and feel how cold it is, even if the car has been running for hours.

Cheers

Josh

whenever you pressurise anything the temp raises. so when you depressurise something (like letting the air out of a tyre) it cools.

that is how a fridge works.

a fuel cooler is used in high performance engines because the fuel is running at higher pressures (so its hotter) and they don't want vapourisation.

Edited by mad082
whenever you pressurise anything the temp raises. so when you depressurise something (like letting the air out of a tyre) it cools.

that is how a fridge works.

a fuel cooler is used in high performance engines because the fuel is running at higher pressures (so its hotter) and they don't want vapourisation.

Well you learn something everyday. When I went to school it was the latent heat of vaporisation that allowed a closed cycle refrigeration system to function. Maybe my school was too old skool or something. :P

its simple, both are correct.

the refridgerant is continually compressed into a liquid (results in heat in the hot coils) and then expanded to a gas in the cold bit (latent heat of vaporisation helps add to the coldness as it "takes in" more heat from surrounds to change liquid to gas, hence reducing temp), or something along those lines

the latent heat of vapourisation explains why when water gets to 100C, it doesnt suddenly explode into a gas all at once (or change to a gas more quickly than it does) - it needs more heat input before it has enough energy to change states

but for something thats a liquid the entire time at different pressures, the difference in heat isnt all that great (ud need a reasonably high pressure fuel system for it to be an issue, nothing that production cars have)

Edited by NewKleer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The attached document is fine. I just downloaded & opened it.
    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
×
×
  • Create New...