Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys.

I have searched!

Car r33 gtst S1 Auto

Im running the new gt3540-IW

with a built bottom end and a standard head + cams

So my question is who has got to 300 kws at the wheels with standard cams and then replaced them for some poncams?

Most serches i did came up with about 20 kws as an average over the rev range, but most were all in the low to mid 200 kw range! Does this increase as the flow / Kws increase?

Cheers Darren :)

Hey Guys.

I have searched!

Car r33 gtst S1 Auto

Im running the new gt3540-IW

with a built bottom end and a standard head + cams

So my question is who has got to 300 kws at the wheels with standard cams and then replaced them for some poncams?

Most serches i did came up with about 20 kws as an average over the rev range, but most were all in the low to mid 200 kw range! Does this increase as the flow / Kws increase?

Cheers Darren :laugh:

Darren,

If your question is only related to High end KW's the Poncams will not get you there.These are designed for road...so responce and Kw's are higher through your rev range and really does not peek 50kws at top end.

If you are only after a 1/4 Mile car....HKS step2 type cams with heavier springs , retainers and higher lift

is what you should look at....oh you need a thicker head gasket aswell.

These Cams will give you up to 50+Kw's at the higher revs...but will be a dog to drive around with :) .

Hope I have been of some help.

Cheers

Tekin

oh u bought the new internal gate gt35 ? hows it go i orderd a internal gate gt30 waiting for it to arrrive cant wait !

very nice!

i would say its a little to big if your running a manual, but the auto loves the gt35.

the gt30 would be a nice compromise.

and im not looking for huge peak power just all thru out the rev range, and i figure the poncams have got too be better then standard cams

do u think il be expecting alot of lag ? supporting mods wil be 740 nismo injectors,ems system,044 fuel pump,z32 afm custom dump intake pipe and cooler pipe etc, wat kinda power u reken i could achieve ?

cheers sam

what size exhaust A/R did you pick?

mines a .82 and i see full boost by 4200 with stock cams and gears.

so you should be fairly similar i would say, although mine being auto helps bring the boost on.

power ?

maybe get to 400 hp if the winds blowing the right way. but you might need some more mods, and a rebuild if you get to excited with the boost.

i havent heard of anyone having the new gt3040r-iw yet so you might be the first!

as i was with the gt35!

where are you getting it from?

dang 400hp lol ? id be so stoked if i got that kinda power lol i dont think id make that tho im hoping for atleast 350, and im getting it from sliding peformance, i plan on getting some poncams early next year

dunno what the fuss its all about...I make about 300 with std cams..although I have got new cam gears just havn't fitted them yet.

I cant get tit there with my crap clutch atm

Id be intrested to rtead more about new cams...although I'm happy with the output...thats enough for a rwd.

Sammie don't confuse the GT30R (GT3076R) with the GT3040R (GT3082R) . The first one is less laggy and comes std with a port shrouded compressor housing and is more than capable of the 3-400 Hp you seek . The second one will be more laggy as well as physically larger in the compressor housing so harder to find space for .

GT3076R uses cartridge no 700177-5007 , GT3082R uses cartridge no 700177-5014 . Confirm with Slide . I not long ago stripped a turbo for someone else here and it was not the one they thought it was . You MUST be sure of the part numbers , also be CERTAIN the integral waste gate housing is the genuine Garrett GT30 type for best results . If possible get pics from the supplier . All this gear is expensive and very much so if you have to do it twice instead of once .

Cheers Adrian .

i left my car to get tuned yesterday and its was making 260rwkw on 16psi and he still had heaps of tuning and boost left so i will find out today! ohh and thats with a gt3076r 0.82ar

Edited by al_r33
get some hks cams as stated above i got extra 51kw with headgasket and retune..

so what power are you at at the moment and what turbo are you running?

As mentioned above the stage 2 cams need all the other goodys to go with it! are you using them or just the stage 1 cams?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...