Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Steve, you want the ztune side skirts?

Si, i've got a pair, but what i've realized is that they don't fit up under the GTT body correctly, there doesn't seem to be any suitable mounting points.

Thinking of getting a set of skirts through viva garage that basically replicate the side skirt of a gtr and also have the nismo skirt moulded into it.

Si, i've got a pair, but what i've realized is that they don't fit up under the GTT body correctly, there doesn't seem to be any suitable mounting points.

Thinking of getting a set of skirts through viva garage that basically replicate the side skirt of a gtr and also have the nismo skirt moulded into it.

I have the same dilemma, have the GTT pods but need the skirts to complete the look. These are simple add ons for GTT but the full skirt fills the car out a lot more.

I'm liking the subtle differences like the pods and tinter rear indicators (and ofc the colour), looks like a completely different car to what I saw at the charity cruise. gw

Edited by sonnyQ

I have the same dilemma, have the GTT pods but need the skirts to complete the look. These are simple add ons for GTT but the full skirt fills the car out a lot more.

I'm liking the subtle differences like the pods and tinter rear indicators (and ofc the colour), looks like a completely different car to what I saw at the charity cruise. gw

I always say i am against body kits and big wings etc but to be fair, that does look pretty good! Mine is just plain jane! Nothing flash....

I have the same dilemma, have the GTT pods but need the skirts to complete the look. These are simple add ons for GTT but the full skirt fills the car out a lot more.

I'm liking the subtle differences like the pods and tinter rear indicators (and ofc the colour), looks like a completely different car to what I saw at the charity cruise. gw

Yep i have those,

They don't bolt up correctly under a GTT, i got my rear pods from them also (well actually purchased through a third party which was probably a mistake but anyway the pods are fine to bolt up, rather than using self tappers like they provide i drilled 3 holes in the plastic rear bar and used a nut and bolt combo so they can be easily removed and refitted if need be.

I now plan to purchase THESE side skirts which as you can see replicate the gtr skirt with the nismo lip moulded in.

Also have the top secret style front bar that JSAi has for sale with the gtr front lip.

I've managed to get it to fit pretty flush where it mates up to the front quarter panels, but it sags a little under each headlight, not over joyed about that so i'll be attempting to make some for of bracket to pull it up under the headlight. Thing is im trying to do it in such a way that it has ease of removal for when i need to drop the front bar for whatever reason.

Edited by RusH_

Yeah the viva garage ones look like the best option.

What does JSAI recommend for fitment of the skirt add ons? Might be keen to take them off your hands if you don't want them...

Yep i have those,

They don't bolt up correctly under a GTT, i got my rear pods from them also (well actually purchased through a third party which was probably a mistake but anyway the pods are fine to bolt up, rather than using self tappers like they provide i drilled 3 holes in the plastic rear bar and used a nut and bolt combo so they can be easily removed and refitted if need be.
I now plan to purchase THESE side skirts which as you can see replicate the gtr skirt with the nismo lip moulded in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...