Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK well i just got my car dynoed and here is the result. the mods are front mount intercooler, hks air filter, turbo back exaust with gutted cat, boost controller set to 10psi, SAFC, and a bosch 910 fuel pump,

also as u can see the car was dynoed at RE CUSTOMS and i cannot thank ray enough i recommend anyone wanting a tune or work done to head down there. i know ill be going back when i get a power fc which will hopefully be soon post-14524-1166431184.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147832-dyno-result-im-happy/
Share on other sites

nice man. nar mine is black i was there on friday aswell and he chucked my car on the dyno and then i got the bad news my fuel pump shit itself so i brought a new 910 and O what a difference and he didnt really need to change my air/fuel somehow it was running great but he used the safc just to make it a bit richer up high end car goes great im so pleased. calder on wednesday should be fun

nice man. nar mine is black i was there on friday aswell and he chucked my car on the dyno and then i got the bad news my fuel pump shit itself so i brought a new 910 and O what a difference and he didnt really need to change my air/fuel somehow it was running great but he used the safc just to make it a bit richer up high end car goes great im so pleased. calder on wednesday should be fun

fantastic - let us know how your car goes on wednesday..... yeah u might have seen my car there on friday (white s2 r33). welsh plugs gave way when they were doing hte service, so had to change all that - now its running great. Gonna get more mods done through them (the exhaust was done thru them)

That is a very high result for a fairly stock car. especially for only 10psi. I think the dyno is being a bit optamistic. Also your power curve is quite wonky in a couple of places. it might have been slipping on the dyno :P

this was mine with only a couple of mods - done at RE as well

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2753467

i could be wrong, but wouldnt the intercooler and the fuel pump increase the power output significantly?

That dyno reading is a joke, my car has the exact same mods and it sure as hell does NOT have 210kw at the wheels.

Somthing is wrong there.

With those mods id expect about 170rwkw.

cheers

your engine might be getting rather tired, or the dyno you went on under read to some extent (170kw is pretty low for those mods) and his over read to some extent.

for those mods i'd say about 190kw would be pretty accurate. remember that he does have a gutted cat.

ahh 170rwkw was just an estimate.

I havnt had my car dynod as yet but i hav those mods and im also putting on a batmbl front/drump pipe soon with a 5" body cat.

Haha pretty sure after i do that my clutch is sure to die a horrible death.

The only reason i didnt think i had that much power because i raced a mates stock 180 running 10 psi and he beat me by 1/2 a car length.

NOTE: race was conducted at appropriate race track

only way to find out if the power is correct is take the car down to the drags and compare the times/terminal(trap) speeds with others car of that power range.

no point comparing dynos.

my 2cents

My understanding behind shootout mode dynos, was to apply a correction so that most dynos could be compared. Now there is nothing wrong with the figures, as the correct mode was used and the air temps look right.

I am puting my money on either it running too lean, or you have a non-stock turbo in it (hi-flow / aftermarket).

Forget the figure, look at the power curve. something not right.

9 psi by 6h km/ph in 4th? looks like the operator held it on load untill he started the run. This is not really and indication on what the car will do on the street and will F96k up the peak torque figure.

Then there is a taper off and then an full 10 rwkw more at redline.

as long as the car holds boost correctly and the AFR's are safe the figure does not matter really. Still I have NEVER seen a car wth this level of mods produce more 190rwkw.

Glad you are happy with the result :(

Cheers!

yeah I have the same bs figure as well, 199rwkw before tune and 211rwkw after tune with a SAFC2. I must have gotten on a happy dyno as well, must get myself to a more moderate one to test out again, coz there's no way I'm gonna believe that. Although its fun bragging to people about it hahahahah

the only accurate way to compare timeslips from the track is to have the same person drive both cars. in a way they are like dyno readouts. 1 person may be a crap driver, but have more power and better tyres, suspension, etc, but still run a slower time at a slower speed than someone who can driver really well.

so i brought a new 910 and O what a difference and he didnt really need to change my air/fuel somehow it was running great but he used the safc just to make it a bit richer up high end

it should already be waaay rich with the new pump and stock ecu... he would have been leaning it out with the SAFC not making it richer

and no point running with a gutted cat unless you have a section of pipe put in there... just creates turbulance otherwise and no power gain

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...