Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, just letting you know the results from putting on the TRUST 710x305x165mm intercooler.

We first ran the car up as is and made 350AWKW

Once we put the cooler on we gained alittle bit of lag(not much) and then we gained 31kw at the wheels.

This to me was a great result.

I then had a bit of time to put on the 4" exhaust to see what would happen.

Yet another 30awkw.

We ended up with 410awkw

If i'm right thats 17% increase.

The car will head back to CRD in the new year. The goal is 500awkw on pump gas.

fingers crossed.

Next mods might be bigger cams and injectors.

Also a big thanks to the guys at CRD for the cooler, The guys at Hypertune for installing and piping up the cooler and also C&V for staying back late whilst we were changing the exhaust.

Cheers

Paul, I believe it.

The thing that most people miss when installing a larger IC is reduction in restriction.

I'll use the analogy of upgrading the stock IC. When people upgrade the stock ic to a fmic, they usually see an improvement in power. The improvement is not so much from an improvement in cooling. Yes, the air will be cooler, but at stock turbo power levels, it doesn't really get that hot. The power increase comes from a reduction in restriction. It is restrictive at that power level.

In this case, at 350awk, the new IC is clearly less restrictive. I don't know if 30 kw is believable, but i would certainly expect some improvement at that power level.

Depending on what the old exhaust was, e.g. if it was a 3" exhaust with a couple of mufflers, a cat, etc, then that result is perfectly valid. Replacing a restrictive exhaust at 350awkw with a less restrictive one will produce significantly higher power levels, because of the larger number to start with.

Edited by MANWHORE

if he went from a poor mans standard gtst side mount stuck on the side there getting minimal airflow to a better/larger core in the front of the car getting much more airflow then i would agree, but is it really that much of a differenece? 30kw is a massive change, surely something else was changed at the same time?

for a 30kw gain i would have expected something like this;

previous intercooler

compress outlet temp: 70deg

intercooler in temp: 65deg

intercooler out temp: 62deg

new intercooler

compress outlet temp: 70deg

intercooler in temp: 65deg

intercooler out temp: 35deg

then yes i would agree that a gain like that is possible as the air has a significant temperature drop. how bad was the last core ?

Yep, agreed.

its larger, colder, and maybe the new core is of better flowing quality.

I know some one who has avl, they ahd a huge front mount already, and the car put about about 560 at the wheels., he put on this huge F*ck off cooler, of crazy dementions, and no shit, the car put out another 60hp odd. but response was out the window of course, but topend power was more. just cause the air colder = more oxygen.

its a drag vl, so he didnt care.

Paul, like I said above, when doing a power run, the intercooler will not really get that hot, so any improvement in cooling won't be noticeable.

The imrpovement comes from reduction in restriction. The cross area of the new core is significantly larger:

New core: 50325 mm squared

Old core: 30000 mm squared

Hey guys

I'm not going to try to prove anything here, people on this forum know that i wouldn't make up crap.

You gain extra power two ways.

1 less pressure drop across the core(less back pressure on the turbo.

2 reduce inley temps.

this car did have a trust 600x300x100mm core, but the power was dropping off up top.

We thought this was from a restriction of some kind which we thought was the cooler.We also knew that the exhaust would give me about that power because we have tested it before.The other exhaust is a trust unit and we had a cat removal pipe fitted.

I'll see if doughboy would be kind enough to put the photos up today.If there are any serious none believers just call C & V when they open back up.

You could have just run more boost through it, as it’s essentially the same thing. Colder = safer not necessarily more power. If you really did have gains like that, I would have to say your old core was a piece of crap or your advertising for CRD.

Hypertune did the fab work and install

C&V help out with the Dyno

CRD is a TRUST dealer who sold me the intercooler.

We run a TRUST T88-33d.

All we did was change the piping to suit the new cooler.

we already had a hypertune intake and 100mmTB.

AS for we could just run more boost thats right, but first we are getting the car sorted with what we currently have.

I'm not sure what the record for power out of a 33D is but we'll see what we can get out of it.

Also i'm not about to wind up the boost with the new mods when the car has not had a retune.

We want to make hte most out of our engine and turbo set-up, not just wind up the boost and see what figures we can run.

i would rather run more power on less boost, yes it mite cost a bit more but at least we can see what the engine is capable of.

Edited by 600hp
HRMMMM. this could be why im stuck on 307 awkw on 20 psi threw a t04z lol. (stock internal)

yet another thing to add to the list

That power doesnt sound right Dave :P Somethings definately holding your car back

My car is making around 15awkw more than yours at the same boost level with GT-SS's

HRMMMM. this could be why im stuck on 307 awkw on 20 psi threw a t04z lol. (stock internal)

yet another thing to add to the list

This is one of the reasons we think our car made bugger all gains changing from GT2530's > GT-RS turbo's

the poor quality core was too restrictive...and was unable to flow the extra air the larger turbo's could provide....mind you it was 120mm thick but the core construction was old school and the newer technology cores flow a lot more air for their size.

Ben we have the same large core on our car (twin entry TRUST 163mm)...they are pricey but are certainly the "ducks nuts"

Well done with the results...see you in the new year mate.

Paul and Stace

Hey Paul,

I was very supprised with the results as well.

I'll drop around to Doughboy\s place tomorrow and drop of the photos .

We also took a video of the dyno run with the 4"exhaust.

Very loud.

Have a good christmas everyone.

Cheers

Ben

Edited by 600hp

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...