Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pro's: Keeps larger turbo motors on boost during gear change, allows you to flat shift, flames and noise from the exhaust.

Con's: fouls plugs, voids insurance (if you have any), creates excess heat in turbo system and can cause major turbo failure, illegal, flames and noise from the exhaust.

I've got one on order from homer_rulz on ns.com

Pro's: Keeps larger turbo motors on boost during gear change, allows you to flat shift, flames and noise from the exhaust.

Con's: fouls plugs, voids insurance (if you have any), creates excess heat in turbo system and can cause major turbo failure, illegal, flames and noise from the exhaust.

I've got one on order from homer_rulz on ns.com

Thanks for that and yes i have full insurance on my car and in NZ the rev limiter does not void it and its not illegal.

and when you say can damage turbo surely thats with excess hitting the limiter and not just daily driving

Edited by r33madd

i think you are confused, there are a few concepts to the "limiter" device and how they work

type 1

yank the throttle cable and rpm will fly to whatever you set the limiter to, so lets say 4100rpm and wont go beyond. mash the pedal / pull the cable and it wont go past 4100rpm so you have consistent rpm for launch each time

type 2

same as type #1 but when it hits the set RPM it does spark cut so you get bang bang style antilag launch. when the spark it cut, it induces misfire which spool the turbo despite no engine load so you make boost whilst the car isnt moving. so when you take off you take off at 4100rpm with 1bar boost wound up in the manifold (lets say) and the compress its on full song when you launch.

type 3

type 3 is a hybrid and lets you have 1 & 2 but also gives you spark cut when you push the clutch pedal in so you can flatshift with antilag style changes. come time to change gears, pedal in, spark cut activates, boost keeps buidling, clutch out and keep going

-------------------

type 1 is just for consistent launches

type 2 will fry the exhaust wheel / cat and any parts along the way. it will shoot flames, make lots of bang bang noises, pop its ass off and generally be rally car style antilag

type 3 same as type #2

for type 2 you would want to have

- steel wheel exhaust wheel on the turbocharger

- no cat

- hiflow exhaust and big dump/front pipes

- a good safe tune and exhaust temp guage to watch the temps

type 1 - not sure, i think the bee *R does this for you

type 2 - gizmo launch interface @ www.apexi.com (under usa, electronics)

type 3 - gizmo launch interface @ www.apexi.com (under usa, electronics)

the first ill be buying when i have my evo is the gizmo box, the guys in the US/japland use these and can bring about 1.3 bar at launch

pros

will make kick ass launches

bring on boost without engine load

cons

noisey

need some precautions

not for street use

will annoy anyone nearby

need good traction to use the launch rpm / power

i think you are confused, there are a few concepts to the "limiter" device and how they work

type 1

yank the throttle cable and rpm will fly to whatever you set the limiter to, so lets say 4100rpm and wont go beyond. mash the pedal / pull the cable and it wont go past 4100rpm so you have consistent rpm for launch each time

type 2

same as type #1 but when it hits the set RPM it does spark cut so you get bang bang style antilag launch. when the spark it cut, it induces misfire which spool the turbo despite no engine load so you make boost whilst the car isnt moving. so when you take off you take off at 4100rpm with 1bar boost wound up in the manifold (lets say) and the compress its on full song when you launch.

type 3

type 3 is a hybrid and lets you have 1 & 2 but also gives you spark cut when you push the clutch pedal in so you can flatshift with antilag style changes. come time to change gears, pedal in, spark cut activates, boost keeps buidling, clutch out and keep going

-------------------

type 1 is just for consistent launches

type 2 will fry the exhaust wheel / cat and any parts along the way. it will shoot flames, make lots of bang bang noises, pop its ass off and generally be rally car style antilag

type 3 same as type #2

for type 2 you would want to have

- steel wheel exhaust wheel on the turbocharger

- no cat

- hiflow exhaust and big dump/front pipes

- a good safe tune and exhaust temp guage to watch the temps

type 1 - not sure, i think the bee *R does this for you

type 2 - gizmo launch interface @ www.apexi.com (under usa, electronics)

type 3 - gizmo launch interface @ www.apexi.com (under usa, electronics)

the first ill be buying when i have my evo is the gizmo box, the guys in the US/japland use these and can bring about 1.3 bar at launch

pros

will make kick ass launches

bring on boost without engine load

cons

noisey

need some precautions

not for street use

will annoy anyone nearby

need good traction to use the launch rpm / power

you are not far off, but the descriptions need a little work. basically there are 2 main types of rev limit employed in efi cars. 1. fuel cut (this is the most comon and is what your factory ecu or power FC uses). 2. ignition cut (this is what the Bee-R limiter uses, and PFC pro uses).

That is the only diference. The Bee-R device also incorporate a stationary rev limit. so when the car is not moving it will limit revs at a different point than once moving. so you can set a stationary rev limit of say 4500rpm for launch. so all you have to do is hold your foot flat on the floor and it will keep the revs at 4500 (and the resultant missfires will help build some boost too), once you have release the handbrake and started moving it will enforce your regular rev limit of say 8000rpm.

It will not allow flat shifting as it does not cut ignition on gear changes.

What you describe as type 3 is just an ignition cut style limiter and will cut ignition when the clutch pedal is depressed and cease cutting one the clutch pedal is released. this will cut power to the engine momentarily to allow you to select the next gear without lifting your foot off the throttle. I dont see it of that much benefit to be honest as you are still shifting using the clutch, and if using a synchro box you are limited in how fast you can shift by the synchros more than anything. plus when shifting at high rpm, there shouldn't be much delay in response when you get back on the gas. it would probably give a small improvement though. and the less responsive your engine/turbo package, the more benefit you would get. I'm not familiar with the gizzmo unit, but if it does what you say then this is how it would work.

I'm not sure if you will find any info on the gizzmo unit at www.apexi.com. Gizzmo is a NZ company. I think they have their own website somewhere.

yes, which is a fancy way of saying it's a stationary rev limit (executed by way of ignition cut). ;)

oh, i must be blind too. there is a whole section on gizzmo on apexi-usa. lol

its not stationary its secondary.

reason I say that is it doesnt have to be wired to the handbreak.

mine is wired to the clutch so I can flatchange gears. :)

Did not realise this, so does that mean that bee-r rev limter can also be used for flat shifting if wired to the clutch?

My sons Datto 1600 uses a Wolf with ign rev limit and a second limit for launch and flat shift and even tho it has a GT30R turbo it makes over 20PSI standing still sounding like a war zone.Been in the car a few times with Commodore drives giving him a hurry up but when he uses the launch control they gave up the idea when they hear it.

has always wonder this, which styled rev limiter is softer than the other?

i was under the impression that ignition cut puts less stress on the oil pump as well as turbine wheels.

that is true, the unburnt fuel igniting cant be doing good for zorst on the turbo.

theres arguments for and against, the main one is that a fuel cut has potential to cause a lean condition, and others argue that no fuel = no combustion, so its not possible.

Edited by midnight

Hahhahahahaha!! YES!!! thats the only reason why i want one. I just want to scare the commodores off so they settle down and leave me alone instead of giving it a hit on the street.

I wonder what boost my rb30det with gt35r will make with it standing still?

Oh and if you have the crank collar modification for the oil pump then the pump shouldnt have any issues should it ? (running stock rb25det pump)

My sons Datto 1600 uses a Wolf with ign rev limit and a second limit for launch and flat shift and even tho it has a GT30R turbo it makes over 20PSI standing still sounding like a war zone.Been in the car a few times with Commodore drives giving him a hurry up but when he uses the launch control they gave up the idea when they hear it.
Edited by Guilt-Toy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...