Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Honda + CASH = Brawn on board. Ross wont give a sht about how much he can improve that shtbox Honda...he just will love watching his bank account...ching ching...mind you it wouldnt be real hard to improve on Honda's 07 effort

Todt was the smart little general (aka Napaleon) of the reds....there is a big chance of Ferrari slipping back into the bad ol days now

you are an idiot.

People like Ross get rich by doing a good job and acctually caring how his work reflects on him

edited.

im going to save this for when it really matters.

Edited by m3gtr
you are an idiot.

I was being sarcastic dumb shit :)

Brawn has an unequaled name for excellence and total professionalism with his work...ask Ferrari

I was serious about Todt though...This could bring about the decline of the reds :)

ferarri in 2 years have lost MS, RB and JT. not good. seems that schuey leaving sparked a bit of an exodus. they should be ok for 2008 but I would say 2009 could be a different story.

ferarri in 2 years have lost MS, RB and JT. not good. seems that schuey leaving sparked a bit of an exodus. they should be ok for 2008 but I would say 2009 could be a different story.

Not to mention Rory Byrne...

this is dumb shit reporting from tokyo...

latest news is that the one and only Shu has shown an old but still clean pair of heels to the whole pack in testing at Burca.

Lapping some 2 tenths faster than Luca Badoer in the sister red head, Shu showed the field he is not over the hill ( although D.Hill is definitely over him ) and will continue to make 10 times more money that the rest of the drivers and that, during retirement.

I say bring him back.

Question is.///

Who would take him, how much does he want, how long would he stay, why would he do it ...spring up as questions that come to mind over michael...

I for one, can't believe hes still as competitive as he was 15 years ago... he truly is a man apart.

Edited by m3gtr

lol, not only is MS still mighty quick he is also a master of understatement and modesty...

"The German topped the time sheets on his return to the cockpit. He said: "It took me a bit of time, maybe two laps, and then I was back into the groove."

"And I have to say I surprised myself that I was so quickly on it again," he added. "

LOL< stick him in a force india! hed still show them all how its done. Ive always wanted to see how he would do in cars that far back in the field...

fark if he comes back for another year, I reckon I will get to at least 3 or 4 rounds. I have seen him race (and win!) in person a number of times, but more couldn't hurt. I don't think it will happen though :)

I can't see schuey suiting up again, more is the pity.

Ferrari already have two drivers, he's not going to go to a second string team, and no one else competitive could afford him even if Ferrari let him go (unlikely).

It'd be great to see what he could do alongside Hamilton, but really, Schumacher IS ferrari's golden boy, and to see him in anything else would be more than a little odd.

I love to see it, but I'm highly skeptical.

Wont happen. Fact is the team is is technically still strong and they have two good drivers who can win in the right equipment. MS strength was people wanted to work with him and be part of the winning team, hence the defection of all the Benetton engineering and race mechanics when he left for Ferrari.

Its all media hype for Ferrari giving him the keys for testing, it wont change the fact that the bloke could not muster the care factor to be jetting all over the globe and putting up with all the drama of F1 to make a return for a single season.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...