Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Having watched one too many BMI videos and knowing most of the tuned Z33s are still in NA form, I've heard numerous internet gurus saying how unresponsive the VQ engines are to turbos. This brings me to question Nissan as to how they manage to extract 380kw out of the VQ engine for the new GTR. I mean, would an extra 0.3L of displacement and twin turbo be enough to extra 180kw out of the engine? or have they completely redesigned the engine? I know that some have tried to turbo a Z33 engine but only managed a small gain in power.

Not entirely true. Where did you hear it from?

For starters, the GT500 cars run VQ30DETTs, and they do OK so there's no issue with the block itself.

The VQ35DE's biggest problem is its softer-than-shit bottom end. It'll only reliably make around 300rwkW - push it harder and you'll eventually snap a rod. Of course, since the engines only exist in NA guise the OEM fuel system needs to be replaced too, but that's to be expected.

That said, if you keep it under 300rwkW the VQ is fine. The standard APS TT uses a pair of GT2871R's blowing 7psi to make around 280rwkW, which isn't too shabby considering its practically lag free. To put it in perspective, a stock 350Z will make around 155rwkW.

I know a couple of daily driven TT 350Z's with unopened engines, and they've had no dramas. The only one I'm aware of that's blown up was one that had been boosted to 320rwkW.

As for what the VQ will handle if you do build it up, how about a "streetable" 550rwkW?

As for what the VQ will do if you go all out and forget street use, apparently this drag 350Z runs a VQ block, and makes 1800hp (from sources not in the comments field of that YouTube page).

The estimates I've seen in car magazines is that they think the GT-R will have around 330kW - which given what an aftermarket TT kit will do the engine is way too low in my opinion. You'd think with the extra displacement, FI bottom end, and all that R&D they would squeeze out 400kW+.

Edited by scathing
The estimates I've seen in car magazines is that they think the GT-R will have around 330kW - which given what an aftermarket TT kit will do the engine is way too low in my opinion. You'd think with the extra displacement, FI bottom end, and all that R&D they would squeeze out 400kW+.

Even if they dont, someone else will make the kit aftermarket

even so is it CONFIRMED that its actually a VQ in the new gtr

or some steroid fed hybrid? or some completely new engine?

just cause its a 3.8L V6 doesnt mean its a bored out VQ

actually speaking of which...Has any indepth specs been released on the new GTR??

are there any pics of the interior yet??

RellikZephyr

Quote

"Even if they dont, someone else will make the kit aftermarket"

I think nissan needs to come out with 400kw+ to stop so many people out there commenting on how overrated gtr's are. I don't think Nissan will though I believe they should.

also by the time it hits the market, 330 to 370kw won't be in the ball park of the latest euro super cars, including m5, 911 turbo etc. These cars have been making this power for some time and will continue to produce more and more power.

By then they will producing this in the locally made HSV's so will have to continue to take the bogan abuse.

Unless they can make it a nible handler or come out with something amazing, I imagine it will fail to impress. If they could produce twice the power of a 350z with similar balance of a 350z plus 4wd, that will impress.

I'm hoping for the best though have a suspision I will be disappointed.

Just my thoughts.

Quote

"Even if they dont, someone else will make the kit aftermarket"

I think nissan needs to come out with 400kw+ to stop so many people out there commenting on how overrated gtr's are. I don't think Nissan will though I believe they should.

also by the time it hits the market, 330 to 370kw won't be in the ball park of the latest euro super cars, including m5, 911 turbo etc. These cars have been making this power for some time and will continue to produce more and more power.

By then they will producing this in the locally made HSV's so will have to continue to take the bogan abuse.

Unless they can make it a nible handler or come out with something amazing, I imagine it will fail to impress. If they could produce twice the power of a 350z with similar balance of a 350z plus 4wd, that will impress.

I'm hoping for the best though have a suspision I will be disappointed.

Just my thoughts.

VERY valid points :)

One more ill throw into the mix: If the new one comes with 330kw or 370kw, even a lot of the R32, R33 and R34's out there currently will be faster (well, by faster i mean have more power) - and thats before the German cars even get a look in :)

it won't be a VQ.. it'll be a VQxxVH :/ lots of changes have been made to improve the VQ.. a lot of them to allow higher revs and no doubt support a powerful turbo setup. 350kw in stock form is my guess.. With the scope for a few nismo tuner models pushing out 450kw, etc..

Having watched one too many BMI videos and knowing most of the tuned Z33s are still in NA form, I've heard numerous internet gurus saying how unresponsive the VQ engines are to turbos. This brings me to question Nissan as to how they manage to extract 380kw out of the VQ engine for the new GTR. I mean, would an extra 0.3L of displacement and twin turbo be enough to extra 180kw out of the engine? or have they completely redesigned the engine? I know that some have tried to turbo a Z33 engine but only managed a small gain in power.

Think there are some people out there who might disagree the this.

http://forums.freshalloy.com/showthread.php?t=159347

And I think this is not the VQ35HR which apparently has a stronger bottom end.

Cheers

  • 2 weeks later...

The mods are dropping down in price as the cars become more common, and tuners get behind the engine.

When I got my Z33, it was pretty much the first time that engine had appeared in a sports car. There was nothing on the market for it internationally, and what was there cost an arm and a leg.

To put it in perspective, buying a HiTech / APS catback cost just under $2000 back then. A Fujitsubo SS was around $2700. And these were practically the only two on the market (aside from some US-made ones which would also have cost around AUD$2K landed), aside from titanium exhausts which were around $4000. JDM and US extractors were about AUD$1500 landed.

These days I can get a Buddy Club catback for $1600 and JDM extractors for around $1000 (or UAS ones for $600).

Munna - do you run that site? Do you have any data on the existance of a PowerFC for the VQ35DE? So far the only bespoke engine management systems I've found are the Unichip, TurboXS UTEC, HKS FConPro V and some American ones.

Munna - do you run that site? Do you have any data on the existance of a PowerFC for the VQ35DE? So far the only bespoke engine management systems I've found are the Unichip, TurboXS UTEC, HKS FConPro V and some American ones.

Yes, and my apology's as I am not sure of the existance of a power FC for a VQ ill have to edit that page.

cheers

  • 4 weeks later...

Its not like Nissan would've grabbed some VQ35DEs chucked on some turbos aftermarket style and bored them out. The engineers would've completly redesigned the engine, its been spotted all over the US driving around while engineers log info on the engine and improve it. They test it for reliability buy literally sitting them on the rev limiter until they blow, seeing what failed first and upgrading it.

The main point is will it be better than the RB26? and stock it will almost put out twice the power

As a bit of a RB vs VQ example, you could compare the Stagea S2/R34 engine RB25DET (neo) with the Stagea S3 engine VQ25DET.

The RB25DET (neo) puts out 206kw and has 333N-m of torque (343 in the R34 skyline i think).

The VQ25DET puts out 206kw (could be more?) and has 400N-m of torque. Thats quite a jump.

There are a number of differences, the major one being completely different engine design, with the VQ being a V6 as opposed to the RB which is a straight 6.

This is the only current factory turbo'd VQ engine I'm aware of. I'd say its definitely possible to turbo a VQ engine and with good results, but like others mentioned there are few aftermarket options for it.

I'm looking forward to the official power figures of the new GTR and I also wonder if the performance potential will be as great as with the current line-up of GTRs. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...