Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

fancy pants law student ey.

Cant have NP's in that degree :) Id be kicked out after my first year :laugh:

Wonder what the most common engineering field is in this forum. I myself doing industrial engineering :rant:

lol rename thread to : which type of engineer are you?

I'm an electronic engineer. Hardware Design by trade. LOL I did about 10 mins of it...pitty for you it was on the fixed speed cameras being rolled out in vic.. haha eat it.

  • Replies 362
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Office is in Collins St, US parent so goal is to work in New York on Wall Street.

Which building?

IT Operations for me... Senior/shift leader.

I reckon a fair portion of people (who are on these forums) are in IT somewhere... well... its the dominating industry it seems

Which building?

IT Operations for me... Senior/shift leader.

I reckon a fair portion of people (who are on these forums) are in IT somewhere... well... its the dominating industry it seems

101 Collins Street

Which building?

IT Operations for me... Senior/shift leader.

I reckon a fair portion of people (who are on these forums) are in IT somewhere... well... its the dominating industry it seems

cmon then Ash...give me a job :rant: haha

Which building?

IT Operations for me... Senior/shift leader.

I reckon a fair portion of people (who are on these forums) are in IT somewhere... well... its the dominating industry it seems

Being internet forum, most jobs would be related to IT/office.

Dont think you'd see a lot of noble park skyline muzzas posting their occupation.

Thats mostly the stereotype associated with skylines and other imports and wouldn't be seen around these forums.

Maybe ns.com :rant:

ahh fair enough... the station in beconsfield or berwick u go from?

From Beaconsfield, though some nights we when we are working on a major corporate action, takeover etc company will put me up in a city Hotel for the night or couple of nights.

101 Collins Street

Should have realised it would be parliament end... Being thats where all the action is for your industry.

Our office was only a 2 blocks from there till the IT people were shipped down to 333

And its the nicer end of Collins aswell, far better then middle/Spencer part.

cmon then Ash...give me a job :rant: haha

If i hear of something i'll let you know my friend :)

I live in Berwick what skyline you got should of seen it getting around..

I have a white R33, 96 GTS-T 2 dr thats been lowered, normally have a coffee in High St, Berwick on weekends when I don't go away.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...