Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got my new engine built and I was told it was going to have 8.8:1 compression but when i compresson tested it i got a reading of 120 in each cyl.

Now correct me if i am wrong but that is pretty low as my old stuffed engine had 150 in each cyl and that was around 8.3:1 or abouts (stock rb30e pistons)

So my question is can you convert that psi reading in the cyl to a compression ratio ? (was done warm with throttle open)

I would like to know what compression ratio it is.. looks to me that its in the 7's.. would that be right ?

I noticed the cometic head gasket looked like a shim plate. around 2mm so maybe thats why its ssooo low...

so how do i know the compression ratio of this engine? the engine builder said 8.8:1 but i dont think its there.

I dont really mind that its low because im going to add another 10psi boost and it will be fine on pump gas.. might try 25psi

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/151803-engine-compression/
Share on other sites

you know the stroke, the CC of pistons, CC combustion chamber, headgasket thickness and how far under/over the piston sits compared to the block deck. From this you can work out an accurate compression ratio.

Just by going from the guage u have a few problems, different guages and cam overlap. You have static compression ratio, and dynamic comp ratio, so when you use a comp tester the cams if they are larger or set to a different position that can bleed off more/less air, therefore changing your readings.

also, you need to go thicker head gasket when you go oversized pistons (if you want to stick to the same comp ratio), unless they dish in the piston is larger as the comp ratio will rise.

Edited by GTR1993

Getting oversize pistons makes stuff all difference to the comp, if tis the same cams as the previous motor, and has lost 30 psi, its a fair bet its running lower comp. How many k's has it done? Do you know if the engine builder cc'd the chambers, checked piston heights/squish etc. Is it an r33 head, if so i cant see any reason for a 2mm head gasket, usually you are trying to get as much comp out of them as you can, even with n/a pistons, do you know what brand of piston was used?

I had the same problem in my rb25 when it was rebuilt as i found out a year later that the comp tests shouw up as 120psi across all pistons. In the end i pulled the motor apart again and got it tested and the comp ratio was 8.1:1 with a std head gasket.

  • 1 year later...

I really dont think you can accuratley compare cylinder compression with compression ratio.

The compression ratio is just the ratio of the volume of the combustion chamber at BDC to the volume of comb chamber at TDC, its just maths, not anything to do with psi...correct me if im wrong

Doesnt take into account loosely toleranced pistons, rings etc,blow by, or long duration cams with big overlap which will all reduce the actual compression of the engine

But i guess that if engine A and engine B, were built to the same tolerances, and were up to the same temperature, with the cams cams etc, but A was 9:1 and B was 8:1 then cylinder compression should be higher in engine A

So there can be a relation but its not a guarantee

take a look at http://www.type2.com/library/engineg/comrat.htm

they have a table from the bosch automotive handbook, that relates CR to compression, going by that you could have anything from 6.8-7.8:1, thats a pretty big range, but still supports ur guess that your compression ration is in the high 7's

hope you work it out mate

Couple of calculators for you:

http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html

http://golenengineservice.com/calc/calccr.htm

Did you have the combustion chambers modified in any way - if you have then chances are the chambers will be bigger which will reduce your comp too.

I've just had an SR built an we initially installed 8.5 CP's but as the head had been modified (by JHH Engineering) we then had to install 9.0 CP's to get the static comp up to the target 8.8:1. We didn't have the head at the time the bottom end was built and had relied on general comments from JHH that the volume wouldn't vary much. Not having a go at JHH - I'm stoked with the job they did.

Just saying it pays to CC's everything and calculate the comp ratio before buttoning up the engine.

Personally I would rather run more comp, less timing and less boost. With E85 fuel coming on song I can then retune for more timing and boost.

Couple of calculators for you:

http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html

http://golenengineservice.com/calc/calccr.htm

Did you have the combustion chambers modified in any way - if you have then chances are the chambers will be bigger which will reduce your comp too.

I've just had an SR built an we initially installed 8.5 CP's but as the head had been modified (by JHH Engineering) we then had to install 9.0 CP's to get the static comp up to the target 8.8:1. We didn't have the head at the time the bottom end was built and had relied on general comments from JHH that the volume wouldn't vary much. Not having a go at JHH - I'm stoked with the job they did.

Just saying it pays to CC's everything and calculate the comp ratio before buttoning up the engine.

Personally I would rather run more comp, less timing and less boost. With E85 fuel coming on song I can then retune for more timing and boost.

If you really want to know the precise ratio and do not have the information to calculate it (cc of head, exact bore and stroke) then perhaps you can measure it by pouring oil down the spark plug hole at TDC and then filling it again at BDC - potentially messy (bit of a mission to get the oil out again) but dead accurate (and no, I haven't done it myself).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...