Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got my new engine built and I was told it was going to have 8.8:1 compression but when i compresson tested it i got a reading of 120 in each cyl.

Now correct me if i am wrong but that is pretty low as my old stuffed engine had 150 in each cyl and that was around 8.3:1 or abouts (stock rb30e pistons)

So my question is can you convert that psi reading in the cyl to a compression ratio ? (was done warm with throttle open)

I would like to know what compression ratio it is.. looks to me that its in the 7's.. would that be right ?

I noticed the cometic head gasket looked like a shim plate. around 2mm so maybe thats why its ssooo low...

so how do i know the compression ratio of this engine? the engine builder said 8.8:1 but i dont think its there.

I dont really mind that its low because im going to add another 10psi boost and it will be fine on pump gas.. might try 25psi

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/151803-engine-compression/
Share on other sites

you know the stroke, the CC of pistons, CC combustion chamber, headgasket thickness and how far under/over the piston sits compared to the block deck. From this you can work out an accurate compression ratio.

Just by going from the guage u have a few problems, different guages and cam overlap. You have static compression ratio, and dynamic comp ratio, so when you use a comp tester the cams if they are larger or set to a different position that can bleed off more/less air, therefore changing your readings.

also, you need to go thicker head gasket when you go oversized pistons (if you want to stick to the same comp ratio), unless they dish in the piston is larger as the comp ratio will rise.

Edited by GTR1993

Getting oversize pistons makes stuff all difference to the comp, if tis the same cams as the previous motor, and has lost 30 psi, its a fair bet its running lower comp. How many k's has it done? Do you know if the engine builder cc'd the chambers, checked piston heights/squish etc. Is it an r33 head, if so i cant see any reason for a 2mm head gasket, usually you are trying to get as much comp out of them as you can, even with n/a pistons, do you know what brand of piston was used?

I had the same problem in my rb25 when it was rebuilt as i found out a year later that the comp tests shouw up as 120psi across all pistons. In the end i pulled the motor apart again and got it tested and the comp ratio was 8.1:1 with a std head gasket.

  • 1 year later...

I really dont think you can accuratley compare cylinder compression with compression ratio.

The compression ratio is just the ratio of the volume of the combustion chamber at BDC to the volume of comb chamber at TDC, its just maths, not anything to do with psi...correct me if im wrong

Doesnt take into account loosely toleranced pistons, rings etc,blow by, or long duration cams with big overlap which will all reduce the actual compression of the engine

But i guess that if engine A and engine B, were built to the same tolerances, and were up to the same temperature, with the cams cams etc, but A was 9:1 and B was 8:1 then cylinder compression should be higher in engine A

So there can be a relation but its not a guarantee

take a look at http://www.type2.com/library/engineg/comrat.htm

they have a table from the bosch automotive handbook, that relates CR to compression, going by that you could have anything from 6.8-7.8:1, thats a pretty big range, but still supports ur guess that your compression ration is in the high 7's

hope you work it out mate

Couple of calculators for you:

http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html

http://golenengineservice.com/calc/calccr.htm

Did you have the combustion chambers modified in any way - if you have then chances are the chambers will be bigger which will reduce your comp too.

I've just had an SR built an we initially installed 8.5 CP's but as the head had been modified (by JHH Engineering) we then had to install 9.0 CP's to get the static comp up to the target 8.8:1. We didn't have the head at the time the bottom end was built and had relied on general comments from JHH that the volume wouldn't vary much. Not having a go at JHH - I'm stoked with the job they did.

Just saying it pays to CC's everything and calculate the comp ratio before buttoning up the engine.

Personally I would rather run more comp, less timing and less boost. With E85 fuel coming on song I can then retune for more timing and boost.

Couple of calculators for you:

http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html

http://golenengineservice.com/calc/calccr.htm

Did you have the combustion chambers modified in any way - if you have then chances are the chambers will be bigger which will reduce your comp too.

I've just had an SR built an we initially installed 8.5 CP's but as the head had been modified (by JHH Engineering) we then had to install 9.0 CP's to get the static comp up to the target 8.8:1. We didn't have the head at the time the bottom end was built and had relied on general comments from JHH that the volume wouldn't vary much. Not having a go at JHH - I'm stoked with the job they did.

Just saying it pays to CC's everything and calculate the comp ratio before buttoning up the engine.

Personally I would rather run more comp, less timing and less boost. With E85 fuel coming on song I can then retune for more timing and boost.

If you really want to know the precise ratio and do not have the information to calculate it (cc of head, exact bore and stroke) then perhaps you can measure it by pouring oil down the spark plug hole at TDC and then filling it again at BDC - potentially messy (bit of a mission to get the oil out again) but dead accurate (and no, I haven't done it myself).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • HFM BM57 has a "bad" knee point, IIRC. It's not the same thing as the later R chassis MC.
    • The ATTESSA is functionally identical to R34; there were a bunch of JDM models that continued ATTESSA including Fuga/Q70, Skyline/Q50, Cima etc as an option. All with Auto only and I think mostly for snow regions. AFAIK there were no AWD VR30DDTT sold in Australia - it is on my to do list to check regs for racing a LHD car in Targa/ATR/AASA/CAMS events because if I can get the auto to work it would be interesting to run a 4wd car The Ecuteck TCM tuning is the same model as their ECU tuning, they already have it for R35 and Dose's favourite, BMW. You buy "points" to allow your computer to be tuned, buy either a bluetooth (phone app) or bluetooth+USB+Key (phone and PC) dongle, and pay for a tune that will be locked to your tuner ( ). You can also access the tuning software yourself but 1. it is mega expensive and 2. these computers have a billion parameters that intersect, so how could you ever spend enough time on it to get a decent result.
    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
×
×
  • Create New...