Jump to content
SAU Community

Taking Photos Of White Cars

djr81

By djr81,
in Photography

 Share

Recommended Posts

djr81 Grand Master

djr81

Posted
Posted

I am having all sorts of problems getting good photos of white cars on racetracks (ie moving) when the sun is out. The panels on the care seem to flare. (If that is the correct expression). anyway, see the attachment for what I am trying to say.

Can anyone suggest any set ups tips (eg exposure length etc) for the camera. It is a Canon S2 IS.

post-5134-1168916416.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/151957-taking-photos-of-white-cars/
Share on other sites
djr81 Grand Master

djr81

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The shutter speed (if that is what you mean) will go down to 1/3200 of a second.

The equivalent film speed is Auto*, ISO 50/100/200/400 equivalent (* Camera automatically sets optimum speeds.)

Specs are here if it helps...

http://www.canon.com.au/products/cameras/d...s2is_specs.html

2rismo Grand Master

2rismo

Posted
Posted

I'm not so concerned about shutter speed as I am the ISO value. If you can manually change the ISO value, do so and set it to 100 for shots like the one in the example. Set the camera to shutter priority (probably on the main dial and indicated by the letters 'Tv'). Pick a shutter speed fast enough so that you're not getting blurred images but slow enough so that you're not losing too much depth of field. Pick a shutter speed (or range of speeds) that works for the conditions you're shooting in and make small adjustments up and down from there. If you see a white car coming and the current setting has been working fine for coloured cars, quickly bump the shutter speed to a quicker setting.

Hope this makes sense.

djr81 Grand Master

djr81

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

I usually set the camera to be able to manually select the shutter speed - mostly because it is in auto the car is gone by the time it gets its shit together. The speed I use varies, but typically is something like 1/400 or 1/640 or 1/800 (from memory).

The ISO speed has four (I think) settings - so I should use a lower setting for the shiney stuff?

BTW, what sort of DSLR whould you recommend for this sort of caper, ie cars on circuits.

Edited by djr81
2rismo Grand Master

2rismo

Posted
Posted

If it's a super bright, really clear sunny summers day then i'd drop it to 50 (i think thats the lowest on your camera). 100 should be more than adequate though. Watch what happens to the aperture value as you increase and decrease the ISO setting for a given shutter speed. You'll get the idea.

One of the best enthusiast DSLR's at the moment is the Canon 400D. Very very hard to beat for the money.

2rismo Grand Master

2rismo

Posted
Posted
you reckon the A100 lens kit is heaps better than the lens kit that comes with the 400D....

Since when do people buy a DSLR and not buy better lenses? The included lenses for the A100 are better than the basic, entry level kit for the 400D but not better than *any* L-Series Canon you could look at.

2rismo Grand Master

2rismo

Posted
Posted

*STAB IN THE DARK* That same shot on a tripod and with a 4-5 second exposure at ISO 400 would have been less grainy and a better shot.

Have you played with the histogram yet? If not, learn what it does and go from there.

sigsputnik Mentor

sigsputnik

Posted
Posted (edited)

a white subject on a landscpe shot in broad daylight is going to be tough. there are better photographers than me on here but for my 2c, here are some tips:

- pay close attention to light metering and tell your camera where to grab the light reading from. if it's averaging across the viewfinder, the sunlight will wash out your white subject.

- try and position yourself so the sun is behind you instead of shooting into the sun.

- use a uv filter or a polarising filter to cater for harsh sunlight. a gradient filter may also allow you to control the wash from the top of the shot.

- use a lens hood

- i know some people use a dual exposure filter to assist (especially for landscapes with bright skies and dark terrain) but they freak me out and i don't fully understand them.

the 400d is god's camera. i would buy one in a heartbeat if i had the $$$.

edit: hmmm, on second thoughts, the 400d is not god's camera, but it is blummin' good. and definitely go the canon over the sony.

Edited by sigsputnik
djr81 Grand Master

djr81

Posted
  • Author
Posted
*STAB IN THE DARK* That same shot on a tripod and with a 4-5 second exposure at ISO 400 would have been less grainy and a better shot.

Have you played with the histogram yet? If not, learn what it does and go from there.

Problem was the wind was really howling - to the extent that I couldn't get the camera to hold still properly. A 4 - 5 second exposure would have been better, but there was no way I could have got a proper shot with it. I had to use the 0.125 second & even then half the shots had the comet walking across the photo.

Played with the histogram. Not suprisingly everything was on the LHS for this shot.

2rismo Grand Master

2rismo

Posted
Posted

That's a good tip about the lens hood. Get one and use it but remember to remove it for flash photography or you;ll get shadows over the pic.

I didn't look closely at the shot to work out it was the comet! Thought it was a plane flying over and I was spewing the other night that i'd missed seeing it. :huh:

If you want a challenge, get yourself onto the startline at WSID and try to take shots of white cars, at night, with their headlights beaming :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • CF.Panda
      R34 25GT Engine Light 21

      By CF.Panda · Posted

      AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • AnimalGarage
      spot the stagea

      By AnimalGarage · Posted

      It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • GTSBoy
      R34 Handbrake light saying ON and intermittently flashing

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...