Jump to content
SAU Community

Has The New Commodore Changed Your View


Smurf
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think the new look was a good move. Although as said before, when i first saw it i instantly thought big astra. Definitely looks better than the other models.

The fact is though, give it 1.5 - 2yrs, and they'll be running the roads like ants on their way to a jam doughnut. They'll be commercial vehicles. They'll be used for government vehicles, business vehicles, cop cars, rent cars etc etc then every fourth man and his dog will have one.

In saying that though, if ever needed a big car to drag stuff around in i'd probably get a commodore or an xr6t, and be just like every other shmuck....

EDIT: spelling

Edited by KeyMakeR33
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well i garuntee they will out handle any old stock skyline, and be faster.

Also built better.

Skylines have pretty average quality plastics and fix and finish. Espicially on the R34's.

People here are so dumb they love skylines so much.

They are saying dynamically the comodore is better than a 5 series bmw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the VE's were benchmarked against the old BMW M5. According to many BMW owners the old BMW's were (dynamically) better than the current BMW's.

I wouldnt say better but it should be pretty close, maybe not comfort wise.

They are saying dynamically the comodore is better than a 5 series bmw.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well i garuntee they will out handle any old stock skyline, and be faster.

Also built better.

Skylines have pretty average quality plastics and fix and finish. Espicially on the R34's.

People here are so dumb they love skylines so much.

They are saying dynamically the comodore is better than a 5 series bmw.

i beat a 307 kw r8 4 times on the "private" street , I was expecting to get a fight but it was an easy win everytime

and I would take my stock 33 gtr with 4wd on a track where handling was required any day of the week over a 2 ton rwd v8

:huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha it weighs about 200 kg more than your skyline.

And remember a GTR was designed for the track, with the ability to be on road.

Where as comodores are road cars that can do quite well on the track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well i garuntee they will out handle any old stock skyline, and be faster.
Ha it weighs about 200 kg more than your skyline.

And remember a GTR was designed for the track, with the ability to be on road.

Where as comodores are road cars that can do quite well on the track.

Yeah that was a nice backflip wasnt it. :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VE's are ugly, way to 'waste' a billion Holden. The Walkinshaw title cannot be claimed by that green machine. The Walkinshaws aerodynamic kit was developed in a proper wind tunnel in the UK and is suppose to be one awesome aero package at that.

I'll never buy a V8. Did you know only 4 of the cylinders work in the VS's and older, its true..... The other 4 KILL BABIES.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well being a Commodore owner, it really hasn't changed my view on them. lol

I'm more of a fan of the VB-VL anyway, but the VE is a nice looking car. (Better then the VYs-VZs)

I would love to have a drive of one and a 13 second 1/4 for a big family sedan is really moving and from what I've heard, around the track they're not bad either.

I like Commodores, but there are better cars around.

Edited by RyanVLSL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was more or less talking about gts-t, gt-t compared to SS's. Or gts, vs an omega comodore, etc, etc

Sorry i should of been more specific.

Well in that case you are comparing a vehicle made in 1998 and earlier with a vehicle made in 2006, 2007.

I have no doubt the interior has improved beyond what was around in 1998.

Take a look at the highest spec V36 Skyline (350GT Type-SP) though for about the same money in Japan (Y3.8million - $39,800rrp before options) as a SV6 commodore ($39,900rrp before options). These are a better comparo.

Both are large 4 door RWD cars with V6 NA motors at around the same price.

V36 Skyline sedan is 4.75m long

Holden is 4.89m

V36 Sklyine sedan is 1.77m wide

Holden is 1.89m wide

V36 Skyline weighs 1600kg

Holden weighs 1735kg (auto)

V36 Skyline develops 232kw @ 6800rpm from 3498cc

Holden develops 195kw @ 6500rpm from 3564cc

V36 Skyline develops 358Nm of torque @ 4500rpm

Holden develops 340Nm peak torque @ 2600rpm. The Holden actually develops about 20Nm more torque at 2600rpm than the Skyline

V36 Skyline has leather interior standard for that price

Holden charge $2500 extra for leather

V36 Skyline sunroof option - $989

Holden sunroof option - $1690

V36 Sat Nav - Standard

Holden sat nav - $1290

V36 Skyline Fuel Economy - 11.4 litres/100KM

Holden - 11.3 litres/100KM

Too bad we won't see them here for a couple of years and if we did Nissan would be forced to increase the price due to duty by 10% and charge 10% tax then realistically it's a 50,000 AUD+ car.

This comparison is valid for domestic vs. domestic markets though and shows what other domestic markets are getting for their $40k and frankly we're getting shafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Chatting one someone recently at racing them at QR. They say you can't take turn 2 in one flat stick in 4th. They don't have the torque to pull them selves straight, so make sure you're ringing it's neck out in 3rd instead
    • Many years ago when I bought my FG XR6T, it came with bald tyres on the back (think pretty much smooth for most of the tread) and brand new Kinforest cheap shit tyres on the front. In the rain, I had more grip in the bald ass tyres on the back, than the brand new Kinforest. To the point you couldn't drive off at a set of lights and turn the corner. Car would only go straight. Very quickly all four tyres were replaced.   A few years back on a VF SV6 I had, it came with brand new chineesium tyres. In the wet at 90kmh, old 1990s tray back tradie utes could corner faster than me. There was one corner on a freeway, in a 90 zone, it's not even marked to reduce speed for those curve, it's not a hard corner, I could put the LandCruiser on mud tyres through with ease (it would easily do the corner in the wet I reckon at 120kmh), the VF however couldn't get through it at 80, as it would want to slide out.   Cheap tyres aren't worth the risk. I like decent brakes, and decent grip.
    • It shouldn't swell like that, (just looked it up) it should say SAE J30R10  
    • Anyone here a submersible fuel hose expert? I pulled my hanger out again for unrelated issues and noticed the hose I popped on last week has already swollen. This is Gates 27093 submersible hose. I've waiting on a response from Gates, but this surely can't be normal? This is on pump gas, not E85.  Is swelling a tad possibly normal? I've also been fighting with my power steering belt.... I've now tossed one and killed two. I just realigned my pulleys again, hoping this time it stays on. It doesn't like high rpm.   
    • Don't want to side track from the thread too much (don't want to upset the thread starter's run from 2007) so here's some old rusted Nissan Laurels in a parking lot in Nishinomiya, Hyogo-ken:
×
×
  • Create New...