Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

slightly off topic but I have a few more questions.

and these are all to have the RB30det in an R32 GTST

1.)What ECU. I know obvious choice is PFC.., what are they worth? what are other options?

I ask this because if you factor in a PFC and hand controller, Z32 or Q45 AFM, the price is pretty high and you don't even have it on there yet.

What ECU's are available that don't need AFM but still work well with cold start, fuel consumption and so forth.

2.) 500HP TURBO. internally gated? will this control boost reliably? which one will bolt to the stock RB20/25 exhaust manifoild?

3.) for this turbo and looking at somewhere around 300rwkw.... what dump pipe?

will those dump and front in one jobs from BATMBL on these forums do the trick?

will it be too restrictive and cause over boost problems?

4.) and this has been looked in to kind of. but... for a street only car (with possible trips to track and strip to see how it all goes onec or twice) but mainly a street car.. what size exhaust housing is best?

since I don't plan to rev past 6000rpm nor run more than 1 bar boost.... the 0.82 rear has been given a "light switch" title by some. is it going to be uncontrolable?

will the 1.02 or what ever the bigger one is be too laggy on the street..

example, cruising in 4th at 65km/h (standard R32 gearbox and diff) and you plant your foot..

will the 0.82 end up in a smoke show?

will the 1.02 end up with you at 70km/h after 5 seconds?

take in to consideration the 8.2 or 8.3 compression I will have using stock Rb30 bottom and stock Rb25de head.

slightly off topic but I have a few more questions.

and these are all to have the RB30det in an R32 GTST

1.)What ECU. I know obvious choice is PFC.., what are they worth? what are other options?

I ask this because if you factor in a PFC and hand controller, Z32 or Q45 AFM, the price is pretty high and you don't even have it on there yet.

What ECU's are available that don't need AFM but still work well with cold start, fuel consumption and so forth.

2.) 500HP TURBO. internally gated? will this control boost reliably? which one will bolt to the stock RB20/25 exhaust manifoild?

3.) for this turbo and looking at somewhere around 300rwkw.... what dump pipe?

will those dump and front in one jobs from BATMBL on these forums do the trick?

will it be too restrictive and cause over boost problems?

4.) and this has been looked in to kind of. but... for a street only car (with possible trips to track and strip to see how it all goes onec or twice) but mainly a street car.. what size exhaust housing is best?

since I don't plan to rev past 6000rpm nor run more than 1 bar boost.... the 0.82 rear has been given a "light switch" title by some. is it going to be uncontrolable?

will the 1.02 or what ever the bigger one is be too laggy on the street..

example, cruising in 4th at 65km/h (standard R32 gearbox and diff) and you plant your foot..

will the 0.82 end up in a smoke show?

will the 1.02 end up with you at 70km/h after 5 seconds?

take in to consideration the 8.2 or 8.3 compression I will have using stock Rb30 bottom and stock Rb25de head.

Suggestions follow;

1. PFC is the go, it is cheaper all up, the install is a simple plug in, car will run on the base maps, drive it to the dyno, $300 job finished.

2. GT30 (do a search plenty of guys have used GT30's on RB25's)

3. BATMBL split dumps will work fine, don't understand the boosting question.

4. The 0.82 would be my choice as I prefer response, I can use the boost controller to soften the boost hit if I want.

:)

GT35/40's what .AR's does everyone recomend? .82 or 1.02?

Clearly due to a limited rev limit, youd want something on early? I'm chasing 300 rwkw at low rpm with minimal boost. Leaning towards the .82 with a 35mm wastegate.

i have a td0620g. r33 rb25head. stock rb30 bottom end. 8 psi. 230rwkw. hits boost very low in the rev range. full on by 2200

the overboosting I was refering to...

Some cars I've seen (mitsubishi's), when the dump pipe or wastegate itself are too restrictive, they tend to over boost or spike up to above what you set it.

don't know wether to call it boost spike or creep or over boost.

and with a largish turbo, and a dump pipe where the wastegate and turbine gases aren't seperated, I thought it might be an issue... but if you disagree, that's a good enough for me.

and with a largish turbo, and a dump pipe where the wastegate and turbine gases aren't seperated, I thought it might be an issue

I thought I covered that with this;

3. BATMBL split dumps will work fine

A split dump separates the wastegate and turbine gases. Or have I missed something :confused:

:)

looney head - it seems that 6000-6500rpm is a safe rev limit

Gary - sorry. when I was refering to BATMBL's dump pipes, I was refering to the original one piece ones which have a bellmouth type opening at the turbo.

which then shrinks down to a 3 inch pipe.

when I read your reply, I skimmed over it and didn't take in the "SPLIT" part.

do you know the other ones I am refering to?

this pic isn't one of his but the shape is kinda similar..

SR%20front%20pipe%201DCP02318.gif

SR%20front%20pipe%202DCP02319.gif

my front pipe had to have a small extender piece welded in. Due to the new height of the motor, the turbo sits higher also. Meaning that the dump/front you are looking at may require some cutting/welding to make it reach your turbo.

Depends how flexible your exhaust is atm. I had mine chopped, as well as had some supports welded to the pipe so i could connect it to the gearbox for added support for the turbo etc...

the overboosting I was refering to...

Some cars I've seen (mitsubishi's), when the dump pipe or wastegate itself are too restrictive, they tend to over boost or spike up to above what you set it.

don't know wether to call it boost spike or creep or over boost.

and with a largish turbo, and a dump pipe where the wastegate and turbine gases aren't seperated, I thought it might be an issue... but if you disagree, that's a good enough for me.

I haven't ever seen that problem on RB's, even with standard dumps and engine pipes. I wouldn't worry about it until you actually experience it on your car.:rofl:

Had my rb30det tuned yesterday.

Previously had what was thought as timing issues. Turned out it was a faulty cas. All sorted....turbo is a rb20 highflow that was on before motor was built.

Results are below. Had issues with the q45 afm...apparently (cubes feel free to go into more detail :)) 1 bar is at the end of the map range.

Shaun, the tuner, said it runs the best when set up with the q45 running as the rb20 afm under the settings. Changing it to the vh45 afm just makes the car run very rich, and he said something like he cant pull any more fuel out?

Cubes....ring shaun for me and get the lowdown on this :) Me no technical :)

Could have run more boost, but like i said need to sort it running rich under boost....

Need subframe bushes now, as the 2 way makes the rear squirm....and breaks traction in 2nd on boost :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here's a boring history lesson on number plates People want illegal spacing to make their plate more readable, if mine was J2X BK, anyone who knows about the car would see that its spelling JZX. Years ago third party plate manufacturers could alter the text to make it look like something else, nowadays the computer software is locks that ability (well, ours does at work) Up until 2001 the first letter of a number plate represented the year of the vehicle, for example A would be 1983. (pre 1983, the format was backwards, so the year letter was on the end). Followed by 3 random numbers and 3 random letters. Things started to get complicated at the end of the 90s where T and V were 1999, W and X were 2000 and Y was early 2001. From 2001 they introduced a new 'layout' where the first two characters are letters, this represented where that vehicle was first registered in the country. The letters corrosponded to a region in the country. Some regions had a large number of codes, where as some only had a couple (despite being large in physical land size) Next are 2 numbers to indicate 2000s. So it went from: Y (March 1999 > Aug 2000) 51 (Sept 2001 > Feb 2002) 02 (March 2002 > Aug 2002) 52 (Sept 2002 > Feb 2003) etc etc When the 2010s got here, the numbers changed again, going up by tens 10 (March 2010 > Aug 2010) 60 (Sept 2010 > Feb 2011) When the 2020s arrived it went to 20 (March 2020 > Aug 2020) 70 (Sept 2020 > Feb 2021) etc As for personalised plates, you're not allowed a registration that makes the vehicle look newer. Take my 110 for example, its a 2004 car so I can have any available plate upto 04. I can't have a 54 because it was manufactured in August 2004. Which allows me to have a J plate, because its older (if that makes sense)    
    • Mount some of these on your dash? https://www.greddy.com/products/16001720  
    • Given you're running a 2.8 and my 2.5 is not really like for like, I suspect there could be a bit more timing you could give it. What is the kW yield per degree you're putting through it? Here's my E85 map to give you an idea, where it was I could still get another 3~4kW per degree thrown at it.  
    • It turns out that Setrab make a fan specifically for the oil cooler which is great and I've installed it with minimal swearing. I removed my 2x 12in push fans from the front of my aircon condenser and wired them into this. My main thermo fans kick on when I use the aircon anyway and would effectively already be working as puller fans through the condensor which is infront of the rad. The push fans (understandably) didn't really do much in the config they were previously in so now they're out. Now we're on to the "Oil fan doesn't really do much either!". Yes I'll duct it next if it does nothing in heavy use which it shouldn't. But hey, the object exists and fits great and is cool. Let me have this. The car is still in the "do my fittings leak oil now? do my wheels actually rub?" phase. I did a spirited drive on them and didn't hear or feel anything. Then I got back home and noticed there were grind marks on the inside of the rims, though I couldn't see where they were touching I got out the grinder and attacked the suspects. Note: I do not know how to use a grinder. Then I realised I had dragged my new rims across my concrete driveway before I did this drive. I didn't think I had damage at that time when I briefly looked...... but remembered this occurred after I did all the angle grinding. The grinding on the wheels in some very specific spots. It's not around the whole rim for example, which lines up with dragging it across concrete more than hitting a suspension component for even 1 full rotation. So everything is currently painted and taped up and I need to test it some more to see if it really IS rubbing, but from inside the car it doesn't feel like it is. In other news I attempted to do a before and after comparison of the heads/cam upgrade thing. Dynos lie, everything is in different measurements. Here is the data from the sandown back straight. Car go faster than before. Vroom vroom.
    • Here's my base ignition. +3 correction to redline when shooting water/meth which is always on. Looking at my old ignition table, I should be able to add 1-2 degree's next time I'm on the dyno.  Let me know your thoughts. 
×
×
  • Create New...