Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

why is everyone strung up on the damn strut brace.

Make new ends to offset the bar across the engine to clear the tb.

If your building the engine, you have to cut and weld the engine mounts, so whats hard about making new strut ends at the same time??

possible issue with making the strut brace higher is that i know my strut brace had rubbing marks on it from the std bonnet.. so i know i wouldn't be able to make the strut brace higher ..

saying that i am hoping i wont have an issue with the plazmaman front facing plenum.

yeah my rb30s now fitted. i didnt need to mod the engine mounts. just a slight hammer on one of the under bonnet supports. looks damn sexy.

should have it running on thursday :(

now only if it would stop raining so i could go outside and finishd changeing the fuel pump :)

why is everyone strung up on the damn strut brace.

Make new ends to offset the bar across the engine to clear the tb.

If your building the engine, you have to cut and weld the engine mounts, so whats hard about making new strut ends at the same time??

yeh but how rigid is it going to be ?

I haven't seen any pics either.

See pic below, can't move it forward with the RB25DET head, have to go right back against the firewall.

Useless...

Edited by conan7772
yeh but how rigid is it going to be ?

I haven't seen any pics either.

Same as the bar was before, or make it better. :blink:

I havent posted pics, but whats so hard to picture about it??

Your simply offsetting a bar forward, not making great structural changes

This is what came out of the rb20det gearbox + lots and lots of large chunks of teeth, be buggered fishing them out of that stinky oil. :O

Drain Plug

The back of the tooth where it broke

The mesh side of the tooth, looks as if the engaging gear was really digging in and not meshing with the whole tooth. :S

The new box is very very quiet.. Feels quite strange, like a new car. :P

Thats a fatigue failure as you can see from the close curved lines across the broken face and the rough area to the other side of the break.

Starts somewhere about where I've marked as best as I can discern from the photos.

Just couldn't handle no more Cap'n

post-6392-1139565202.jpg

This pic illustrates the close curved lines a little better.

Sorry Geoff.. I don't follow the Cap'n... :O

Do you mean repeated high load that attempts to and may very well slightly bend the teeth every time?

A little like breaking a coat hanger by bending it repeatedly.

So definitely rb30 related?

Same as the bar was before, or make it better. :D

I havent posted pics, but whats so hard to picture about it??

Your simply offsetting a bar forward, not making great structural changes

Can't go forward.

There's nothing between the induction pipe and the bonnet.

Running a bar behind the BOV is too bigger an offset.

It will flex under load i.e USELESS.

What head do you have ?

This is what came out of the rb20det gearbox + lots and lots of large chunks of teeth, be buggered fishing them out of that stinky oil. :D

Drain Plug

The back of the tooth where it broke

The mesh side of the tooth, looks as if the engaging gear was really digging in and not meshing with the whole tooth. :S

The new box is very very quiet.. Feels quite strange, like a new car. :D

Gees you got that in quick !

What did you pay for it ?

Can't go forward.

There's nothing between the induction pipe and the bonnet.

Running a bar behind the BOV is too bigger an offset.

It will flex under load i.e USELESS.

What head do you have ?

ive got the 25de head, and you can move it forward.

edit/ im not going to argue about it, but in a 32 it will fit

Edited by Bl4cK32

hey guys...my rb20 just blew up..and im considering doing this conversion as i have heard its a great upgrade....just one question though...i have a rb20det power fc...but if i do this conversion i want to run the rb26 head...will my power fc work with this head (i dont mind if i have to rewire a few things) i already have modded the wiring loom for stock gtr injectors. any help would be good

cheers

It will work fine providing you stick with a single afm.

The only sensor that 'may' not be used is the intake air temp sensor, I am not 100% sure what pin or if it indeed can be used with the rb20det pfc.

SK has said it has or can be done? Not completely sure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...