Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I went with the high drilling for the mounting on the 26/30 but with no time to grab a second adjuster I fitted the belt as it was. While tight it wasn't too tight for the Dayco belt so I kept it on. No adjustment needed.

Another reason for high mounting, we also only use one adjuster and one idler, no need for 2 adjusters.

:D cheers :)

Is this where I get to say "I told you so"? :whistling:

I did advise you to go for the high mount tensioner for very good reasons. I have no idea why people think the lower mounting is better.

You can use the RB30 engine mounts, but you have to modify them. The RB26 mounts are OK too, but they place the engine too high. Lower the engine, it solves all the problems you are currently having.

Another reason for high mounting, we also only use one adjuster and one idler, no need for 2 adjusters.

;) cheers ;)

What swayed me is the reinforcing behind the stock location. It may be meaningless but it might not - granted I haven't heard stories of the high mount set up failing.

If I knew enough about the potential effect on susp geometry to lower the mounts, and it was a quick and easy, and I knew it would do the job, no problem. Making it fit without lowering is tedious but it's 'safer' if you're not a pro.

I thought using 2 adjusters was an advantage given the cost of idlers, as per the guide?

How do you set and measure the tension on yours? Still can't find a deflection value for the 20kg tension listed in the RB 26 manual.

I'm going to work on my tensioner mount.

Cheers

Edited by Scooby
Scooby, the 20kg is in the r32 rb26 engine manual. In a couple of places. 100%.

Hi Cubes I know mate, found it ages ago. What I can't find is what to measure the 20kg against ie there must be a deflection value. It's currently one dimensional. Unless I'm missing something.

There's a hole about 5mm diam, left of where the second tensioner goes as per the guide. It's about 15mm deep. The stud that goes into the water jacket definately has only 9mm engagement?

Cheers

Edited by Scooby

I thought when i measured the hole after i drilled the last block...the vernier depth gauge told me something like 12mm....maybe im drilling in the wrong spot haha >_<

No that wasnt to the water jacket...it was before i broke through...

Edited by r33_racer

I'm about half way (money wise) on my mission to collect parts for my RB30. I managed to pick up an RB25DET head for a decent price except I have to fit it up to an R32. I have a greddy copy plenum on its way which takes care of the intake manifold but I need injectors now :blink:

Anyone know if you can use the RB20 fuel rail and some GTR injectors instead of going to the side feed RB25 setup?

Anyone ever measured the spacing between injectors on both?

Hi guys,

Currently having my series 2 r31 rb30 block dipped then checked so i have come to the point where i need pistons. I know arias make a set but i saw in the guide of cubes that CP make a set which is supposed to give a 9:1 ratio but i have searched for a supplier to no avail. So i was wondering if anyone knows where i could aquire myself a set?

Also i am using a rb26 head and i am looking at turbos, has anyone used a set of N1 turbos before? This is my first build so i am not overly sure on how they would go on the rb30 (ie: when they would run out of puff early in the rpm range?).

Hey ppls,

A bloke I know who runs on the same dyno as I + one of his mates have RB25/30's in their VLT's. They have been sorting the head oil supply issue's. Both run N1 pumps.

Initially using std restrictors the head was flooding.

2 x 1.1mm restrictors. Initiaily all seemed good until it was noticed they were getting lifter tick when getting off the throttle from a hard run on the dyno.

Off the head came again; 2 x 1.5mm's and all is good but it still does breathe a little. The bloke I know said 1.3mm would 'probably' be ideal.

Bit of a nightmare.

Those who run by Gary's oil restrictor table which states for the hydraulic head to block the rear and run a single 1.5mm restrictor up front. Have you noticed any lifter tick when getting off the throttle from a hard run on the dyno?

Is there a reasonable explaination why 2 seperate motors had the same issue with 2 x 1.1mm restrictors when having 2 1.1 mm restrictors should have more oil flowing in to the head than a single 1.5mm. OR maybe the 1.1mm restrictors reduce pressure within the head too much where as the single 1.5mm provides less flow but more pressure? argg confusing myself.

negative cubes...our first motor with n1 pump had back blocked off and 1 X 1.5mm up front with no ticking initially then we found out after a few races two of the lifters were shagged and constantly ticking we replaced them with some second handies out of a spare head and its been good ever since. However we now run two 1mm restrictors....luckily enough it doesnt bother a dry sump system.

Edited by r33_racer
Hi guys,

Currently having my series 2 r31 rb30 block dipped then checked so i have come to the point where i need pistons. I know arias make a set but i saw in the guide of cubes that CP make a set which is supposed to give a 9:1 ratio but i have searched for a supplier to no avail. So i was wondering if anyone knows where i could aquire myself a set?

Also i am using a rb26 head and i am looking at turbos, has anyone used a set of N1 turbos before? This is my first build so i am not overly sure on how they would go on the rb30 (ie: when they would run out of puff early in the rpm range?).

Send a message to Spoolup, who has posted in here. I used his Spool rods and CP pistons for what should be a 9.0:1 ratio. He also has a website attached in his sig.

Hi guys, Currently having my series 2 r31 rb30 block dipped then checked so i have come to the point where i need pistons. I know arias make a set but i saw in the guide of cubes that CP make a set which is supposed to give a 9:1 ratio but i have searched for a supplier to no avail. So i was wondering if anyone knows where i could aquire myself a set?
CP

All compression ratios are based on zero deck height, 1.2mm head gasket (7.13cc), RB25 @ 62.5cc, RB26 @ 64.5cc. They assure me they have done alot of work to make sure the facts are correct.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20

Flat top with no valve pockets

8.2:1 COMPRESSION RATIO with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20-9.0

6.0cc dome top,

9.0:1 COMPRESSION RATIO with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

*Care must be taken when using on RB26 with more than 11.5mm valve lift*

ARIAS

Suit RB30/26

p/n= AP332103

flat top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 8.4-8.6

Suit RB30/26

p/n= AP332104

10.6cc dome top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 9.2-9.4

Suit RB30/25

p/n= AP332105

13cc dome top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 9.5-9.8

WISECO

Skyline RB30 w/ DOHC RB25det cylinder head

1.260" compresion height, 66.5cc head chamber, Dish top -11.3cc, 7.0:1 compression ratio, 21mm pin, 1mm gasket thickness, 1mm deck clearance.

K577M865 86.5mm

K577M87 87.00mm

ACL

6MKRY9608 (VL turbo)

87mm, -4.5cc dished top, 1.261" compression height, 21mm pin,

Standard RB30ET pistons are 7.8:1, with RB25 head it is 7.1:1

These are bumped up to 8.5:1 so with the RB25 head it may give about 7.5:1??

Using http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html I came up with 8.5 for VLT (spot on) and 7.6 with twin cam head with 64cc chamber.

I entered: 2, 87, 85, 87, 1.2, 64cc, -4.5cc = 7.6:1

BUT these have a lower compression height than the CP/Arias and im sure it stuffs up my calculations....

Hi Guys,

I suppose there are not too many of you running twin low mount turbos on an RB26/30, but can anyone give me some advice on the turbo returns? The VL Block has only the one oil return in the side of the block. Would this be sufficient to t-piece into and run bloth turbos back to it?

Also, what about running a small 'catch can' under the turbos which collects from both turbos and then drains into the block via this one fitting... or is this completely unnecessary...?

Hi Guys,

I suppose there are not too many of you running twin low mount turbos on an RB26/30, but can anyone give me some advice on the turbo returns? The VL Block has only the one oil return in the side of the block. Would this be sufficient to t-piece into and run bloth turbos back to it?

Also, what about running a small 'catch can' under the turbos which collects from both turbos and then drains into the block via this one fitting... or is this completely unnecessary...?

hey buddy,

i'm running N1's for the first little while and then changing to GTRS's. What i've done is jsut t-pieced the lines into the single line on the block :P

i would grab some pics for ya, but the motors currently in the car for the dry sump and exhaust fab

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the territory of the "Stage 1/2/3 Golf GTI/R" or otherwise off the shelf tune with (relative to before) minor mods. It's easier now. Downpipe and Tune and boom, big increases. Stage 1 OEM+ is where it's at. This is where the niche evolved into and it's really easy to see why. It's rare to even NEED to consider changing turbos or going to aftermarket ECU's or building bottom ends for more power. Stage 1-2-3 will get you a LONG WAY. Civic Type R turbo GR Yaris/Corolla Anything with B58 (MKV Supra/x40i) Anything BMW in General Anything Audi in General Any turbo AMG RenaultSport Turbo offerings Korean Elantra N/I30N Ecoboost Mustangs Focus RS? List goes on. I would argue in the future it won't even need to go on... M3P is pretty rapid out of the box...
    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
×
×
  • Create New...