Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I went with the high drilling for the mounting on the 26/30 but with no time to grab a second adjuster I fitted the belt as it was. While tight it wasn't too tight for the Dayco belt so I kept it on. No adjustment needed.

Another reason for high mounting, we also only use one adjuster and one idler, no need for 2 adjusters.

:D cheers :)

Is this where I get to say "I told you so"? :whistling:

I did advise you to go for the high mount tensioner for very good reasons. I have no idea why people think the lower mounting is better.

You can use the RB30 engine mounts, but you have to modify them. The RB26 mounts are OK too, but they place the engine too high. Lower the engine, it solves all the problems you are currently having.

Another reason for high mounting, we also only use one adjuster and one idler, no need for 2 adjusters.

;) cheers ;)

What swayed me is the reinforcing behind the stock location. It may be meaningless but it might not - granted I haven't heard stories of the high mount set up failing.

If I knew enough about the potential effect on susp geometry to lower the mounts, and it was a quick and easy, and I knew it would do the job, no problem. Making it fit without lowering is tedious but it's 'safer' if you're not a pro.

I thought using 2 adjusters was an advantage given the cost of idlers, as per the guide?

How do you set and measure the tension on yours? Still can't find a deflection value for the 20kg tension listed in the RB 26 manual.

I'm going to work on my tensioner mount.

Cheers

Edited by Scooby
Scooby, the 20kg is in the r32 rb26 engine manual. In a couple of places. 100%.

Hi Cubes I know mate, found it ages ago. What I can't find is what to measure the 20kg against ie there must be a deflection value. It's currently one dimensional. Unless I'm missing something.

There's a hole about 5mm diam, left of where the second tensioner goes as per the guide. It's about 15mm deep. The stud that goes into the water jacket definately has only 9mm engagement?

Cheers

Edited by Scooby

I thought when i measured the hole after i drilled the last block...the vernier depth gauge told me something like 12mm....maybe im drilling in the wrong spot haha >_<

No that wasnt to the water jacket...it was before i broke through...

Edited by r33_racer

I'm about half way (money wise) on my mission to collect parts for my RB30. I managed to pick up an RB25DET head for a decent price except I have to fit it up to an R32. I have a greddy copy plenum on its way which takes care of the intake manifold but I need injectors now :blink:

Anyone know if you can use the RB20 fuel rail and some GTR injectors instead of going to the side feed RB25 setup?

Anyone ever measured the spacing between injectors on both?

Hi guys,

Currently having my series 2 r31 rb30 block dipped then checked so i have come to the point where i need pistons. I know arias make a set but i saw in the guide of cubes that CP make a set which is supposed to give a 9:1 ratio but i have searched for a supplier to no avail. So i was wondering if anyone knows where i could aquire myself a set?

Also i am using a rb26 head and i am looking at turbos, has anyone used a set of N1 turbos before? This is my first build so i am not overly sure on how they would go on the rb30 (ie: when they would run out of puff early in the rpm range?).

Hey ppls,

A bloke I know who runs on the same dyno as I + one of his mates have RB25/30's in their VLT's. They have been sorting the head oil supply issue's. Both run N1 pumps.

Initially using std restrictors the head was flooding.

2 x 1.1mm restrictors. Initiaily all seemed good until it was noticed they were getting lifter tick when getting off the throttle from a hard run on the dyno.

Off the head came again; 2 x 1.5mm's and all is good but it still does breathe a little. The bloke I know said 1.3mm would 'probably' be ideal.

Bit of a nightmare.

Those who run by Gary's oil restrictor table which states for the hydraulic head to block the rear and run a single 1.5mm restrictor up front. Have you noticed any lifter tick when getting off the throttle from a hard run on the dyno?

Is there a reasonable explaination why 2 seperate motors had the same issue with 2 x 1.1mm restrictors when having 2 1.1 mm restrictors should have more oil flowing in to the head than a single 1.5mm. OR maybe the 1.1mm restrictors reduce pressure within the head too much where as the single 1.5mm provides less flow but more pressure? argg confusing myself.

negative cubes...our first motor with n1 pump had back blocked off and 1 X 1.5mm up front with no ticking initially then we found out after a few races two of the lifters were shagged and constantly ticking we replaced them with some second handies out of a spare head and its been good ever since. However we now run two 1mm restrictors....luckily enough it doesnt bother a dry sump system.

Edited by r33_racer
Hi guys,

Currently having my series 2 r31 rb30 block dipped then checked so i have come to the point where i need pistons. I know arias make a set but i saw in the guide of cubes that CP make a set which is supposed to give a 9:1 ratio but i have searched for a supplier to no avail. So i was wondering if anyone knows where i could aquire myself a set?

Also i am using a rb26 head and i am looking at turbos, has anyone used a set of N1 turbos before? This is my first build so i am not overly sure on how they would go on the rb30 (ie: when they would run out of puff early in the rpm range?).

Send a message to Spoolup, who has posted in here. I used his Spool rods and CP pistons for what should be a 9.0:1 ratio. He also has a website attached in his sig.

Hi guys, Currently having my series 2 r31 rb30 block dipped then checked so i have come to the point where i need pistons. I know arias make a set but i saw in the guide of cubes that CP make a set which is supposed to give a 9:1 ratio but i have searched for a supplier to no avail. So i was wondering if anyone knows where i could aquire myself a set?
CP

All compression ratios are based on zero deck height, 1.2mm head gasket (7.13cc), RB25 @ 62.5cc, RB26 @ 64.5cc. They assure me they have done alot of work to make sure the facts are correct.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20

Flat top with no valve pockets

8.2:1 COMPRESSION RATIO with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20-9.0

6.0cc dome top,

9.0:1 COMPRESSION RATIO with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

*Care must be taken when using on RB26 with more than 11.5mm valve lift*

ARIAS

Suit RB30/26

p/n= AP332103

flat top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 8.4-8.6

Suit RB30/26

p/n= AP332104

10.6cc dome top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 9.2-9.4

Suit RB30/25

p/n= AP332105

13cc dome top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 9.5-9.8

WISECO

Skyline RB30 w/ DOHC RB25det cylinder head

1.260" compresion height, 66.5cc head chamber, Dish top -11.3cc, 7.0:1 compression ratio, 21mm pin, 1mm gasket thickness, 1mm deck clearance.

K577M865 86.5mm

K577M87 87.00mm

ACL

6MKRY9608 (VL turbo)

87mm, -4.5cc dished top, 1.261" compression height, 21mm pin,

Standard RB30ET pistons are 7.8:1, with RB25 head it is 7.1:1

These are bumped up to 8.5:1 so with the RB25 head it may give about 7.5:1??

Using http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html I came up with 8.5 for VLT (spot on) and 7.6 with twin cam head with 64cc chamber.

I entered: 2, 87, 85, 87, 1.2, 64cc, -4.5cc = 7.6:1

BUT these have a lower compression height than the CP/Arias and im sure it stuffs up my calculations....

Hi Guys,

I suppose there are not too many of you running twin low mount turbos on an RB26/30, but can anyone give me some advice on the turbo returns? The VL Block has only the one oil return in the side of the block. Would this be sufficient to t-piece into and run bloth turbos back to it?

Also, what about running a small 'catch can' under the turbos which collects from both turbos and then drains into the block via this one fitting... or is this completely unnecessary...?

Hi Guys,

I suppose there are not too many of you running twin low mount turbos on an RB26/30, but can anyone give me some advice on the turbo returns? The VL Block has only the one oil return in the side of the block. Would this be sufficient to t-piece into and run bloth turbos back to it?

Also, what about running a small 'catch can' under the turbos which collects from both turbos and then drains into the block via this one fitting... or is this completely unnecessary...?

hey buddy,

i'm running N1's for the first little while and then changing to GTRS's. What i've done is jsut t-pieced the lines into the single line on the block :P

i would grab some pics for ya, but the motors currently in the car for the dry sump and exhaust fab

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...