Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks Cubes, I will be limited to around 17psi with a slide hiflow due to the high shaft speed it will be spinning at to supply the 30det. I don't really want to run much higher boost for a street driven car anyway. mind you I would be pissed if it waa goes together and I am limited to 14psi. I want to be able to run the turbo at maximum efficiency. so it looks like I will have to do something.

I am hoping the hiflow will produce 250~260rwkw on the 30det as it would make 241rwkw on the 20det.

A turbo upgrade will be on the cards in 6 months but I don't really like running super high boost.

much more accurate description than mine :(. Looking at the standard RB26 map, the AFR's would be 10:1 if using an RB30 bottom end and putting your foot down at 2400rpm.

Thanks Sydneykid and Nic, I've found a PFC to borrow and will be addressing the issue as soon as I can get it tuned. Luckily there hasn't been that much 'running in' yet. In the meantime you might be interested in this:

http://home.aanet.com.au/nistune/docs/NISt...Quick_Start.pdf

http://home.aanet.com.au/nistune/docs/NIStune_FAQ.pdf

Cheers

hey guys,

go easy on me im a newby here.

ok first post. Is doing the rb30/25-26 conversion the best RB combo. I can see how the extra capacity helps and that it might be an advantage for an rb25, but is it worth doing this to an rb26 engine. i would have thought that having a rb26 block & head would be better considering they came out on the gt-r, and if they wernt that special then wy didnt they make them a 3 litre block form the begining.

What i am trying to get at here is, would it be better having a RB26 complete block and head or a RB30/25/26 combo??

sorry for the question but its puzzled me for a while now to the point where i actually joined the forum and am asking this lol, also has anyone got any pics of there setups i wouldnt mind seeing some.

cheers.

hey guys,

go easy on me im a newby here.

ok first post. Is doing the rb30/25-26 conversion the best RB combo. I can see how the extra capacity helps and that it might be an advantage for an rb25, but is it worth doing this to an rb26 engine. i would have thought that having a rb26 block & head would be better considering they came out on the gt-r, and if they wernt that special then wy didnt they make them a 3 litre block form the begining.

What i am trying to get at here is, would it be better having a RB26 complete block and head or a RB30/25/26 combo??

sorry for the question but its puzzled me for a while now to the point where i actually joined the forum and am asking this lol, also has anyone got any pics of there setups i wouldnt mind seeing some.

cheers.

atleast read the pdf that has been created (its at the very beginning of the thread)

also this question has been asked & answered HEAPS of times before, so please do a search

Thanks Cubes, I will be limited to around 17psi with a slide hiflow due to the high shaft speed it will be spinning at to supply the 30det. I don't really want to run much higher boost for a street driven car anyway. mind you I would be pissed if it waa goes together and I am limited to 14psi. I want to be able to run the turbo at maximum efficiency. so it looks like I will have to do something.

I am hoping the hiflow will produce 250~260rwkw on the 30det as it would make 241rwkw on the 20det.

A turbo upgrade will be on the cards in 6 months but I don't really like running super high boost.

With any hi-flow you'll be choking the engine at about 5500rpm and the power will drop rapidly; as the turbo can not flow enough gases. Just letting you know, in case you wanted to rev the engine to 7500rpm :(.

thanks linedup33, do the timing covers fit on the rb30/26 i ask becuase ive seen a couple of these combos but none have the timing cover on for some reason?

shanef - also i am still slowly getting through this thread and i cant find the pdf u are referring to but i am still looking, thanks.

thanks linedup33, do the timing covers fit on the rb30/26 i ask becuase ive seen a couple of these combos but none have the timing cover on for some reason?

shanef - also i am still slowly getting through this thread and i cant find the pdf u are referring to but i am still looking, thanks.

sigh

Hey guys a quick Q my mate has just bought a N1 oil pump for his RB26/30engine build & is getting some bad feedback from his workshop saying a few of these hav let go. Just quickly he rang & asked if i knew anything. What do u guys think any recommendations? or is this a good option???

Anybody??????

Hey guys a quick Q my mate has just bought a N1 oil pump for his RB26/30engine build & is getting some bad feedback from his workshop saying a few of these hav let go. Just quickly he rang & asked if i knew anything. What do u guys think any recommendations? or is this a good option???

Anybody??????

Read the frickn thread, this covered just three pages ago.

Quote GT-RGeoff:

Not a fan because the N1 is a much more brittle material so doesn't have much residual toughness for things like bouncing off the limiter, but that does happen even if you don't want it to.

Also there is no real justification for much higher oil pressure/flow. All it will do is deposit more oil in the head which you then have to get back to the sump for pickup. Oil system function and efficiency is not based upon the amount of flow or delivery pressure, but the maintenance of the thin film of oil between moving metal components. Oil pressure does not provide lubrication; oil presence and viscosity does it. Some systems use the natural viscosity to pull the oil through without a pump.

It would be great to know that the flow is moving the oil through to prevent overheating and molecular breakdown, but pressure is always a measure of restriction when it comes down to the final analysis so a high flow pump giving greater pressure head is simply showing the restrictions present, and therefore the lack of ability of the high flow pump to really make any discernible impact.

Caleb, I assume you haven't driven a GTR then. They are a particularly lazy engine and take a little while to make power when off boost. I guess the lower compression compared to a GTSt is the difference, as well as having to crank up 2 turbos that make more than the GTSt singles.

A 30 will have more torque at the same CR and benefit from the modern head for flow and response. In my case I have 9:1 CR so it should be even more torquey. It made 160rwkw as an NA with the turbos hanging off it and as I noticed today putting new cam gears on, one tooth out advanced on the inlet so has been particularly sluggish. More to follow when I get it running again btw guys.

As for a R34 GTt head, our mate Spoolup has one so look him up, plus source your cam gears/rods/CP pistons from him.

Oh and Shane, while you look and remind me of Ash (la Nismioda) , we really really only need one of him..... :(

Thanks Sydneykid and Nic, I've found a PFC to borrow and will be addressing the issue as soon as I can get it tuned. Luckily there hasn't been that much 'running in' yet. In the meantime you might be interested in this:

http://home.aanet.com.au/nistune/docs/NISt...Quick_Start.pdf

http://home.aanet.com.au/nistune/docs/NIStune_FAQ.pdf

Cheers

It's a really nice bit of kit and I have been following it's development for the past 12 months.

it is a really good alternative to a PFC. I helluva lot of work has gone into it.

With any hi-flow you'll be choking the engine at about 5500rpm and the power will drop rapidly; as the turbo can not flow enough gases. Just letting you know, in case you wanted to rev the engine to 7500rpm :worship:.

As expected ;) tiny exhaust housing will do that. its a bit of an upgrade path. but thanks for the heads up, I am thinking 3040 or gt35r further down the track

Fair enough.

I just bought a GT30R for my 25/30, as i like the response for motokhanas. But i just recently saw a graph of a 25/30 with a GT35R and i am starting to doubt my decision :worship:.

I someone (*cough* Joel *cough*) pulled his finger out, fitted their GT30R and posted the results, it may put my mind at ease ;).

Does anyone have a dyno graph of a rb25/30 fitted with a GT30R?

(Michael maybe?)

Im not sure about others but from what I've seen the big single makes all its boost at an earlier rpm than 2 similiar sized twins.

So thats lag.

Response; once there's enough exhaust gas to bring both the big single and twins up on to lets say 1bar.

Put the foot down; the 2 smaller twins with less inertia are able to spin quicker up to speed and accelerate off. More so noticable in the lower less load gears.

Thats my understanding behind why Nissan went twin parallel turbo's, offer the best response when accelerating out of corners.

Having gone for a ride in a fair few GT-SS or 2530 GTRs i can honestly say they feel a little boring. They ramp onto boost nice and soothly with no real big hit of torque. Singles makign the same power seem to make the same power, but the torque hits harder with a steeper gradient as it ramps onto boost. Im all for the singles myself as you get brother gate. But twins do seem to be the less nonsense solution ...well at least the cars i have been in . LOL i need ot move to SA to feel the single RB30 love ;)

look around ive posted the dyno graph here before. Probably both...before WI it was 320rwkws...after was 370rwkws.

Imagine a nice 45 degree looking line pulling all the way to redline. Al just do a search for me or something its either in here or in the rb30 thread. Actually it will be in the rb30 power thread.

My head arrived today. complete RB25DE from R33 with VCT. 100% complete except for injectors and fuel rail.

I took the cam covers off and the head is a clean as a whistle. :unsure:

Would someone be able to confirm a few things for me. please bear with me, I am 60 pages of the way there :O

I have taken a pic of the front of the head and highlighted the area I believe to be correct. Is it OK to tap a M8 or 10 thread and put a grub screw in here instead of welding? locktite would hold it in place. then drill in the front of the head that lines up with the gallery and tap a fitting in that will be supplied from the OPS. I have read the thread and am about to go ahead with these mods and just want 100% confirmation before I bugger the head :P

Also what to I do with the other gallery highlighted?

VCTfeed.jpg

The R34 NEO head requires the same mods to the water and oil galleries as the R33 head. It doesnt however require any mods to the front cam bearing oil gallery as its internal gallery runs the full length of the head.

The comb chambers are smaller so piston choice is critical and limited to achieve a good compression ratio.

I too have a R34GT Four and plans are underway for a RB30 conversion using a Pro engines adaptor. They are a cheap 4wd option with all the mod cons - a cheap R34 GTR basically - after a few suspension mods :-).

Hi, like everyone has said bloody great thread, im only upto page 60 or so but give me a week and i'll be up to date >_<

I've decided to jump to the last couple pages to see if anyone has discussed using the r34 neo head so i've just go a quick couple of questions. I've read the rb30 DOHC guide and it says that the water/oil galleries are different in the r34 head and the head has less cc's at only 50cc.

So...

1. Has anyone done a rb30 neo conversion?

2. How different are the galleries? What needs to be done compared to the r33 head?

3. What is the compression ratio with the r34 head like?

I have a r34 gt-four (you would of never of guessed with my user name haha) and this is looking very attractive, i also realise that an adapter needs to be bought to fit my sump onto the rb30, but its been done before with the r32 & 33 gts-4's so it shouldnt be to hard

thanks

My head arrived today. complete RB25DE from R33 with VCT. 100% complete except for injectors and fuel rail.

I took the cam covers off and the head is a clean as a whistle. >_<

Would someone be able to confirm a few things for me. please bear with me, I am 60 pages of the way there :D

I have taken a pic of the front of the head and highlighted the area I believe to be correct. Is it OK to tap a M8 or 10 thread and put a grub screw in here instead of welding? locktite would hold it in place. then drill in the front of the head that lines up with the gallery and tap a fitting in that will be supplied from the OPS. I have read the thread and am about to go ahead with these mods and just want 100% confirmation before I bugger the head :D

Also what to I do with the other gallery highlighted?

VCTfeed.jpg

I had my mechanic put in a grub screw in the vct oil feed. so yes you can do (though i havent assembled my rb30 this has worked for Majanals drift car)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...